posted on Feb, 4 2013 @ 08:42 AM
reply to post by Trexter Ziam
I see you are on a vendetta of some sort www.abovetopsecret.com...&mem=OmniPotential - 19 posts so far and almost all are on this subject.
Can we stick to the subject like we are supposed to? Lol. I can't ask a valid question but it's no problem to suggest that I have an agenda in a
conspiracy against ATS.
A bit hypocritical if you ask me.
The Internet is like a soapbox. You want to be heard, you stand on a soapbox. Don't blame the audience for being professional soapbox listeners.
That's just how it is. Never say anything online if you wouldn't scream it from a soapbox.
I don't really care who is listening and reading, it is the nature of a public forum, it is inherent.
It appears that they are actively participating here though and that is what I have a problem with, so I asked the question what this traffic between
NSA.GOV and ATS consists of in the opinion of ATS staff.
Can I be allowed to ask this question and get a serious answer?
And even if they are just reading on their lunch breaks, they would have to be doing that with quite some few people on a regular basis, and this is
not in any way worthy of being pointed out, in your opinion?
Reply to reply below the below: *Yawn* Sorry, ran all out of TROLL food.
You interfered and came up with some joke of an explanation and never took my question seriously. I explained why your explanation didn't make sense
and all you have to say is that I am a troll?
I wasn't even talking to you.
Sofar you have tried to ridicule my inquiry, tried to discredit me as a poster, and called me a derogatory term.
And the question wasn't even directed at you.