It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
He will never do so because it does not behoove him financially and because he wishes to avoid the scrutiny of having a Gift and making money off of it - instead of doing something noble with his power as many would say that he should.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
What I posted still stands as a fact, regardless of the reasons you postulate.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Look, the man is out to make money. A lot of it. If he declares that he has a Gift of Telekinesis he can no longer call himself an illusionist or a magician, or even a mindfreak - even if some of what he does is in fact just illusions.
People just like you would rant and rave that he needs to be tested under strict scientific conditions to prove (to you and others) that he can "back up his claim."
If you had a Gift of Telekinesis and were trying to become wealthy as an illusionist, would you declare openly to the public (outside of a vague reference that a lot of what you do is REAL), that you had genuine telekinetic ability?
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Kinglizard: There are many other viewpoints and many people were shown watching the event from ADJACENT HOTELS, some of which are as high as the Luxor. the statement you made is INCORRECT. There were many viewpoints; from the helicopter taking video, from spectators on the street, some of whom surely had ZOOMS.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
you pick a picture that has the FURTHEST viewpoint...
Originally posted by eyewitness86
The closer shots show him clearly illuminated in the 42 billion candlepower light; NO props, NO platforms, NO wires. the pictures are crystal clear. the proof is right there in the light, clear as day, and brighter.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
...calling him self an illusionist isnt what draws people to his shows. Its the crazy stuff he does.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
If Criss was to come out and say, guess what, i can really levitate, people would flock to him...
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
People just like you would rant and rave that he needs to be tested under strict scientific conditions to prove (to you and others) that he can "back up his claim."
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Well, yes. What wrong with wanting someone to prove their claim?
Originally posted by pavil
The guy proclaims himself to be an illusionist, magician and stunt performer...
Originally posted by pavil
why are you so intent on making him a mystic?
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
And if he didn't have a Gift of Telekinesis, he would not be able to pull the "crazy stuff" off
By the way, he actually calls himself a mindfreak.
I've heard him spite David Blaine in his interviews. There is no camaraderie between them. They are in competition with one another and have been from the very beginning. If Blaine could levitate high in the air, he would have done so years ago.
They do in fact flock to him.
Criss Angel = Jesus
Because no proof would ever be enough for those who are prejudiced.
Those who test him would be accused of not being objective enough, or qualified enough, or obviously they were all paid off by Criss Angel - just as 1 True Criss Angel Fan was in here when he stated that he was levitated fifteen feet in the air by Criss.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Please explain to us how Criss Angel has done his high levitations without any props, camera or editing tricks, or paid off spectators. It is the inability for anyone to come up with plausible explanations that serves to confirm that we are correct in our appraisal that Criss Angel has a Gift of Telekinesis.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
It is NOT a loaded question, it is THE question that stumps every one of you deniers. It is the prime question and of course since NO explanation of merit has been proffered, we stand on the high ground.
It is simple; when you boil it all down to the basics, Criss performs events that CANNOT be explained away with the old tired and pathetic ' wires and props and editing ' garbage
that is totally unproven and for which not one iota of evidence exists or is likley or even POSSIBLE.
Next: The GOLF COURSE levitation in daylight. Lets hear all about the magic invisible helicopters!!
Originally posted by eyewitness86
For now, the high levitations and such are proof of Criss abilities; no one has challenegd the truth in a manner that merits a second look. And on we go. Next: The GOLF COURSE levitation in daylight. Lets hear all about the magic invisible helicopters!!
OR the lack of something is cause for further investigation!
Originally posted by eyewitness86
The LACK of something in and of itself is telling and evidential: for example:
YOU are eliminating the possibilities, not US!!! WE have inclded ALL possibilities and have eliminated the IMPOSSIBLE and HIGHLY UNLIKLEY ones; YOU, on the other hand, have started at the opposite end and eliminated only the possibilties that you do not wish to see be shown true, the other possibility, onlt one for you, is then seen as the logical alternative, despite the TOTAL lack of evidence for same.
Lack of proof means proof to you.
However, vast numbers of witnesses and films and other evenbts all scream out the truth: WE do NOT have a lack of proof, we have scads of proof;
Simply repeating over and over that Criss is just another guy with a great staff and lots of money and its all tricks..is just self delusion and blindness.
there are about 30 percent of the American people that are brian dead, obviously: Bush supporters, right wing loonies..hover at about 28 to 30 percent of the population; no wonder then that about a third of the people in any venue will cling to denial in spite of ANY evidence; they willfully ignore evidence that clashes with their notions; it is common.
They simply say " We don't need no stinking evidence "..and that is that. But for the rest, the ones with a chance at enlightenment, we must persvere and keep showing the depth of deinal they possess and the fact that the lack of evidence is very telling indeed, for them.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
IF CA said, hey this is legit and ill go to whatever lengths to prove it, the skeptics can only remain skeptical for so long. Right now, no scientific proof exists that says CA is legit.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Im not suggesting [that David Blaine and Criss Angel are] buddies at all. Just because blaine hasnt preformed a high levitation, doesnt mean he cant.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Blaine would have to leviate from a bloody airplane to the ground to make his trick bigger than Angels.
Originally posted by pavil
Ok, has CA ever done his levitating without the wearing of jeans and his long sleeve jacket? If he is so skilled, he should be able to do it bare chested should he not? He does other illusions without the use of his jacket, why does he always need it for this one? Doesn't that strike you as odd?
Originally posted by pavil
Why did the spectator POV camera not pan up above CA as he was levitating? CA made a point of doing it BEFORE the illusion started, yet the person just decides not to show the shot which would prove that indeed there were no helicopters / supports and wires. Why must all of CA levitating have him stiffy rigid, couldn't' he "walk" on the air? Why cant he change his axis and go superman pose or do a 360 if indeed he is levitating under his own power. It's pretty obvious due to the lack of aerial shots above him, the use of a jacket, and the way he always starts his levitating (going side to side wobbling) and the stiffness of his actual levitation that he is suspended by wires with clever editing and lack of shots that would prove otherwise. I know I won't convince you and vice versa but at least attempt to explain this questions away.
Originally posted by pavil
I see BTW that no one has taken up my challenge on the steamroller and tried to explain it as other than an illusion. Please at least try.