 |
|
Topic started on 18-6-2005 @ 07:22 PM by RANT
|
      
The AboveTopSecret.com universe (in all it's incarnations) can be a very easy place to get lost in. Some of our members' very best work may have
gotten lost along the way too. As a 100% member driven portal, it's important to recognize the efforts that may have slipped off the radar or simply
been missed in our constant churn of content. New members may appreciate a little guide to our very best as well.
So please don't hesitate to crow. If some of your very best writing and research on AboveTopSecret.com never made the
100 Most Viewed or 100 Most
Replied lists of top discussions, then this is the place to *bump* an original topic or submission no longer in recent posts.
But let's display some restraint. Really, the point of this thread is to submit one or two links to original ATS topics authored
by you that you feel not only represent the very best you've offered but may have been overlooked and certainly deserve more attention; Or it could
be favorite topics by other members that fit the same description.
The full gamut is fair game: Research posts, an investigation, a series, an argumentative position on any subject, an original piece of creative
writing, an original interview, a rant... anything.
And anything could come of this as well. Consider this an experiment of sorts. Try to keep it simple, and even uniform if at all possible.
For example (link and description):
The Case for Roswell (Part I) This is the first part of a definitive series of
posts investigating the Roswell case by our resident UFOlogist Gazrok. 
The floor is open.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 07:44 PM by FredT
|
Just off the top of my head:
Caveat Emptor: The Selling of The GOP's Soul To The Religious Right.
The title says it all. It highlights the upcoming war between the moderates and liberals of the party with the hard core right wing. This is not the
party of Lincoln anymore
I will look for one more to add.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:00 PM by ADVISOR
|
In consideration all of the posts that I've made, and were not replied to, or replied to and killed, among the others that may or may not have been
read. These two in my opinion, should be on the list some where. Some one else would have to point out different, as I am not a very good critic of my
own works, being biased of course. So here are two the general ATSer may want to familiarize themselves with.
Carlyle Gate
I may not have initiated the next link/project, but have contributed enough to be considered a primary author;
The Omega Agency Research Project aka OARP
*See last posts of page six for most recent updates.*
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:06 PM by RANT
|
Thanks for getting the ball rolling.
It's probably true also that our most prolific posters may have many more than one or two subjects to promote, so let's just say use your best
judgement on that.
I've already got some new reading to do!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:10 PM by marg6043
|
Advisor I was not even aware that it was a project on the Carlyle group or I would had respond to it.
Remember, on another thread from ATSNN the Carlyle group was extensively covered by me and various members.
I remember also that you posted a link in the thread to the omega agency research, occurs I was not able to post in it at the time due to my member
status.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:48 PM by tjack
|
Last year ATS had an essay contest, the challenge was to "define" ATS. Who are we, where are we going etc. All the entries were great, but I managed
to eek out a win with...
I still think we're gonna save the world 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:52 PM by ADVISOR
|
All Hail Discordia!
If the pace keep at is like this, well maybe.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:53 PM by djohnsto77
|
I guess these are my two best, but that's not saying much
Holy Hillary!
Revelation of John Applied to Today's World
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 09:04 PM by Hellmutt
|
A couple of mine.
We still don´t know the truth:
How did the 'Estonia' sink 1994?
A promising project:
World's First Commercial Wave Farm
I got more threads I´d like to *bump*, but you said one or two...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-6-2005 @ 07:45 AM by Souljah
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-6-2005 @ 04:57 PM by RANT
|
Cool. Thanks guys.
That all we got?  More please.
[edit on 20-6-2005 by RANT]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 06:40 AM by John bull 1
|
I was a little disappointed this sunk like a stone. It took me three days to put it together. (not a whole three days obviously  )
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 12:54 PM by Amorymeltzer
|
Ahh, JB, I was just looking for that earlier today, wanted to read again. Awesome piece of work that was.  The forum feeds off that kind of
stuff.
18 replies, 426 views. Good, not good enough.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 01:46 PM by starviego
|
Conclusive, irrefutable proof that there were more than two shooters involved in America's most infamous school shooting--the massacre at Columbine
High School in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999, and that government officials are covering up what really happened:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-6-2005 @ 01:11 PM by John bull 1
|
I just remembered this one from a while back.
I wrote it so that members could counter being called a conspiracy fantasist.
Top Ten Real Conspiracies
[edit on 22-6-2005 by John bull 1]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-6-2005 @ 01:20 PM by MCory1
|
I'll throw my hat into the ring as well I guess.
Plausibility Analysis of Archuleta Mesa (Dulce Base)
I wrote it halfway for here and halfway for my English 101 class; something that interested me and actually could figure out what kind of research I
wanted to do. For what it's worth, I consider it my best "academic" writing hands down.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 11:34 AM by MidnightDStroyer
|
...But this thread literally screams out for it...
I'd have to say my best 4 writings here are, in order:
Future Shock,
Concerns on Constitutional Violations & the closely-related
Concerns on Amendment Violations,
and ending with What The Hell Is Hell. I didn't actually start the
last thread listed, but the research I contributed to it is in there somewhere.
Now I'm going back to my best-ever works...Which is really the normal posts I write in response to threads started by other people. If you're a
registered forum member, you can search my username (it's only #13 on the list  ) & look at everything I've posted since the day I started
posting.
[edit on 14-7-2005 by MidnightDStroyer]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 02:54 PM by wecomeinpeace
|
Can we recommend threads by authors other than ourselves? I see a lot of awesome threads that I think deserve to go here, but the authors may be to
shy to submit them themselves.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 03:02 PM by yeahright
|
Wecomeinpeace- If I can have a vote, I'd say "please". As a relative newcomer, it might save me some time vs. randomly pawing through everything
here to glean the nuggets. For example, I just yesterday ran across the Omega Agency Research Project and really got caught up in reading it.
(Thanks, ADVISOR. great job and I've subscribed to be able to follow up on new developments).
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 03:02 PM by Umbrax
|
The thread I've worked my ass of on was, Backgrounds of Scientists and Organizations Who
are Skeptic of Global Warming
It follows all the money that does into disinformation regarding Global Warming.
I always felt it was dry reading but it has plenty of research in it.
I actually just added to it a few seconds ago. That was the first reply on the thread since April.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |