Prince Charles gives the world 18 months to save humanity from climate change

a reply to: DBCowboy

You just let us know when you feel comfy enough to have a real discussion that you feel you can be a part of

Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism

Prince Charles, bless his heart, is not an intellectual giant, which is true of the entire family. It's not like he has done any original research here. He just believes what others have told him. What he has to say about the state of the planet is about as important as the local butcher.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism

My oh my.

How authoritarian.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism

My oh my.

How authoritarian.

You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.

50 years of WRONGNESS.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism

My oh my.

How authoritarian.

You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.

If you or anyone else wants to use something other than fear and intimidation to push the climate change narrative, you're more than welcome to.

My assertion stands.

A few months ago, someone created a thread that highlighted simple, cost effective ways to eliminate the dangers of man-made climate change with no raise in taxes, no loss of individual freedoms and liberties.

These concepts were not new, but are ignored because the end goal is not about the climate but about amassing more power and control.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism

My oh my.

How authoritarian.

You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.

If you or anyone else wants to use something other than fear and intimidation to push the climate change narrative, you're more than welcome to.

My assertion stands.

A few months ago, someone created a thread that highlighted simple, cost effective ways to eliminate the dangers of man-made climate change with no raise in taxes, no loss of individual freedoms and liberties.

These concepts were not new, but are ignored because the end goal is not about the climate but about amassing more power and control.

Keeping it going. Encore.

Yeah Keep going.



Over a decade ago.

From 50 years of wrongness that was linked earlier

originally posted by: neo96
Yeah Keep going.

Over a decade ago.

From 50 years of wrongness that was linked earlier

Yes climate change is false because of statements made by Prince Charles...

a reply to: ScepticScot

The Theory the church of climatology pushes is false simply because it's based on INCOMPLETE data and SNIP modeling.

I wonder why they IGNORE that 4.5 billion year hole.

I wonder why they're letting themselves be lead around by the nose like a modern day indash navigation always taking wrong turns.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

The Theory the church of climatology pushes is false simply because it's based on INCOMPLETE data and SNIP modeling.

I wonder why they IGNORE that 4.5 billion year hole.

I wonder why they're letting themselves be lead around by the nose like a modern day indash navigation always taking wrong turns.

Every single part of that was wrong. Well done quite an achievement.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Nope it isn't.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nope it isn't.

I do apologise you are correct.

Sat navs are terrible.

Just all the rest was wrong.

a reply to: ScepticScot

I know I am.

Because CLimate norms are just a 30 year average.

So Wheres the average for the last 4.5 billion years.

Oh that's right.

Google Translate it.

WHAT the eff ever.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

I know I am.

Because CLimate norms are just a 30 year average.

So Wheres the average for the last 4.5 billion years.

Oh that's right.

Google Translate it.

WHAT the eff ever.

I was sceptical but the random capital letters convinced me.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Nothing the church of climatology says is remotely convincing.

Get more data and more geological cores. Get better equipment and then maybe people would listen.

The more there is .

The MORE accurate it is.

And lose the condescension.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nothing the church of climatology says is remotely convincing.

Get more data and more geological cores. Get better equipment and then maybe people would listen.

The more there is .

The MORE accurate it is.

And lose the condescension.

There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas.

You also have confused mockery with condescension.

That was condescension.

a reply to: ScepticScot

There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas

Pot meet kettle.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas

Pot meet kettle.

My view is based on the view of the overwhelming number of experts in the field. If alternative evidence cones out I would be happy to change my opinion.

Yours seems based on sticking you fingers only your ears and screaming 'its all lies'.

a reply to: ScepticScot

My view is based on the view of the overwhelming number of experts in the field.

Sounds like a bunch of people you agree with confirmed your BIAS.

Yours seems based on sticking you fingers only your ears and screaming 'its all lies'.

Because it is.

It's a free country, and nothing says I have to be compelled to believe ABSOLUTE garbage.