It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prince Charles gives the world 18 months to save humanity from climate change

page: 12
14
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You just let us know when you feel comfy enough to have a real discussion that you feel you can be a part of

Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism




posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Prince Charles, bless his heart, is not an intellectual giant, which is true of the entire family. It's not like he has done any original research here. He just believes what others have told him. What he has to say about the state of the planet is about as important as the local butcher.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism



My oh my.

How authoritarian.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism



My oh my.

How authoritarian.


You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:31 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism



My oh my.

How authoritarian.


You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.


If you or anyone else wants to use something other than fear and intimidation to push the climate change narrative, you're more than welcome to.

My assertion stands.

A few months ago, someone created a thread that highlighted simple, cost effective ways to eliminate the dangers of man-made climate change with no raise in taxes, no loss of individual freedoms and liberties.

These concepts were not new, but are ignored because the end goal is not about the climate but about amassing more power and control.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: DBCowboy



Until then - you don't get to use authoritarianism to scare people into fearing authoritarianism



My oh my.

How authoritarian.


You are entirely right, no one should try and restrict your right, nay your obligation, to be totally and completely wrong online.

I sir salute you.


If you or anyone else wants to use something other than fear and intimidation to push the climate change narrative, you're more than welcome to.

My assertion stands.

A few months ago, someone created a thread that highlighted simple, cost effective ways to eliminate the dangers of man-made climate change with no raise in taxes, no loss of individual freedoms and liberties.

These concepts were not new, but are ignored because the end goal is not about the climate but about amassing more power and control.


Keeping it going. Encore.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:44 PM
link   
Yeah Keep going.



Over a decade ago.

From 50 years of wrongness that was linked earlier



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Yeah Keep going.



Over a decade ago.

From 50 years of wrongness that was linked earlier


Yes climate change is false because of statements made by Prince Charles...



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

The Theory the church of climatology pushes is false simply because it's based on INCOMPLETE data and SNIP modeling.

I wonder why they IGNORE that 4.5 billion year hole.

I wonder why they're letting themselves be lead around by the nose like a modern day indash navigation always taking wrong turns.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

The Theory the church of climatology pushes is false simply because it's based on INCOMPLETE data and SNIP modeling.

I wonder why they IGNORE that 4.5 billion year hole.

I wonder why they're letting themselves be lead around by the nose like a modern day indash navigation always taking wrong turns.



Every single part of that was wrong. Well done quite an achievement.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nope it isn't.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nope it isn't.



I do apologise you are correct.

Sat navs are terrible.

Just all the rest was wrong.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

I know I am.

Because CLimate norms are just a 30 year average.

So Wheres the average for the last 4.5 billion years.

Oh that's right.

Google Translate it.

WHAT the eff ever.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

I know I am.

Because CLimate norms are just a 30 year average.

So Wheres the average for the last 4.5 billion years.

Oh that's right.

Google Translate it.

WHAT the eff ever.


I was sceptical but the random capital letters convinced me.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nothing the church of climatology says is remotely convincing.

Get more data and more geological cores. Get better equipment and then maybe people would listen.

The more there is .

The MORE accurate it is.

And lose the condescension.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot

Nothing the church of climatology says is remotely convincing.

Get more data and more geological cores. Get better equipment and then maybe people would listen.

The more there is .

The MORE accurate it is.

And lose the condescension.


There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas.

You also have confused mockery with condescension.

That was condescension.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:25 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot




There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas


Pot meet kettle.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ScepticScot




There is clearly absolutely no level of data or scientific consensus that would change your mind as it goes against your pre conceived ideas


Pot meet kettle.


My view is based on the view of the overwhelming number of experts in the field. If alternative evidence cones out I would be happy to change my opinion.

Yours seems based on sticking you fingers only your ears and screaming 'its all lies'.



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot




My view is based on the view of the overwhelming number of experts in the field.


Sounds like a bunch of people you agree with confirmed your BIAS.




Yours seems based on sticking you fingers only your ears and screaming 'its all lies'.


Because it is.

It's a free country, and nothing says I have to be compelled to believe ABSOLUTE garbage.




top topics



 
14
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join