It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: dlbott
That seems quite different, talking about a magnetic pole shift. I don't see how that would cause a mammoth to suddenly freeze.
Keep looking though.
originally posted by: dlbott
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: dlbott
do a deep dive on small university study that actually found a pole shift in geology and that it happened in less than a hundred years, a rapid pole shift..
I tried to find it but couldn't.
Can you help? It sounds like it might be interesting.
This is not the one I was speaking about, it was actually in another show that had the university team and study in it but this talks about the same theory and findings by scientist.. in my memory the difference about what I watched was they had there hands on the layer they were saying proved the rapid pole shift... i will continue to look but here a link to similar info...
www.livescience.com...
the grape is attracted to the magnet
It doesn't. Earth's magnetic field is very weak. A refrigerator magnet is more than 100 times as powerful but try moving water with one. There are a number of things which affect the distribution of water on the planet (gravity, Earth's spin, wind, tides, etc.) but magnetism is not really on the list.
So a magnet as big as the Earth which has a lot of water must have at least a lot of water attracted to the strongest parts of the magnetic at the magnetic poles.
Yes. That is electrostatic attraction.
If i create some static on a balloon and place it near water the electrical charge will alter the direction of the flow due to the additional positive charge interacting with the charge in the water?
I always thought electricity and magnetism were essentially two expressions of the same force.
No charge transfer unless they make contact or there is sufficient voltage to arc. In which case the current is of very brief duration.
I thought the transfer of charge between the balloon and the water would constitute current.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grenade
It's a common misconception, as I said.