It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prince Charles gives the world 18 months to save humanity from climate change

page: 9
14
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy


Even the creator of the Green New Deal said it was not about climate but an economic change, so no.
Yes, one of those involved said that it started out as a purely economic package. Not everyone involved agreed.
www.washingtonpost.com...

In any case Green New Deal is going nowhere. Hadn't you heard? There are many who are in favor of climate action who were not in favor of it.




posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy




It's not about climate at all.

Yes, it is.

But change is hard. And what's in it for me? Who cares about 50 years from now. Not my problem.


He is right, it has never been about climate lol.. are you honestly going to set there and say we need to kill your cows, your food, stop using plastic, stop flying etc etc.. really.. you are way to smart for that man... you are way to smart to fall for the whole climate change BS..

It is all about control... they want to control you.. every aspect of your life... what you drive, what you eat.. how you think... this has never been about the climate, ever... same old argument lol.. hey man, they been saying this for over fifty years lol, absolutely nothing has changed lol...

The bottom line is who gains from their actions... think about that one, oh and it is not you lol....



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Don't really care because they'll try another tactic and we'll have this conversation all over again when they try again.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: dlbott




Well, i love ya so not going to argue points with a master, but there is more than one study that does show that one volcanic eruption does put more into the atmosphere than the others.
Yes. For short periods of time, a few hours, a large eruption can produce more CO2 than humans do in that period of time. But compared to the continuous output of humans each year, not even close.



As for the radiation, uva is a form of radiation
Yes. And the magnetosphere does not affect it.


Ok, let's talk about greenhouse and chemtrails
Most studies indicate that contrails have a slight warming affect.


and again I return to some actual problems, like volcano's
Like volcano's what?

edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




Don't really care

I know that.

It doesn't change the fact that the planet is warming due primarily to increasing CO2 concentrations.

edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I'm just a scientist and engineer with dual degrees so I know my opinion on this matter doesn't mean as much as the sobbing politicians that you would advocate for.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

THAT's

Personal information man!



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:13 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I never supported the Green New Deal.

Your opinion is yours to have. I think it is wrong, based on the science.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

He's free to provide it.
The rules say you can't ask.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:14 PM
link   
I don't think the poster with dual degress is wrong.

My opinion is mine to have.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: DBCowboy

THAT's

Personal information man!



I'm tired of people online trying to tell me something based on the emotional diatribe of power-mad politicians instead of actually thinking critically.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

I never supported the Green New Deal.

Your opinion is yours to have. I think it is wrong, based on the science.


And I think your interpretation of the science is wrong.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:15 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Your not the only one.

It's sickening how they use the word science to shutdown dissent.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

I never supported the Green New Deal.

Your opinion is yours to have. I think it is wrong, based on the science.


And I think your interpretation of the science is wrong.

I know. Why are you repeating yourself?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96




I don't think the poster with dual degress is wrong.

You believe him?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

More credibile than those that use the word science wrong.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

What is the correct way to use the word science?

As a verb?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

I never supported the Green New Deal.

Your opinion is yours to have. I think it is wrong, based on the science.


And I think your interpretation of the science is wrong.

I know. Why are you repeating yourself?


I stutter.

Don't be pedantic.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:20 PM
link   
Science : The never ending pursuit of knowledge.

Philosphy: The never ending pursuit of TRUTH.

Politics : The never ending pursuit of bull snip.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

We agree on three things.

Groovy.

But those are not the only definitions.

edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join