It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
BS
1. Read the title of the thread.
2. I'm not focusing on the word, I'm focusing on the war that's supposed to be going on
3. Name these things Titor predicted that have come true. I can't think of one.
violence appears to be increasing with the institution of anti-terror measures.
But some question Taser-related deaths and worry the technology is used too routinely, not as a last resort.
'The heightened so-called war on terrorism I think that is fueling police aggression,....''
''I think that the president's choice with regards to torture, the attack on habeas corpus, the kind of things that we're doing overseas, I think, are actually impacting domestic police policies.
''I think the green light with regards to spying and everything else, what it has done is elevated the role and the public's regard for law enforcement to the attitude that says, 'Those are our protectors. We need to take the gloves off and give them the room to do what they need to do,' Well, they're not always fighting terrorists, and they're not always arresting bad guys. More often than not they're dealing with regular people for small and minor incidents.''
Outright open fighting was common by then and I joined a shotgun infantry unit in 2011.
Our home was searched once and the neighbor across the street was arrested for some unknown reason. That convinced my father to leave the city.
The civil war in the United States will start in 2004. I would describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse.
Does the civil war start in such a way that those willing will have time to remove themselves to safer locations.
Yes. You will be forced to ask yourself how many civil rights you will give up to feel safe.
The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.
Originally posted by XPhiles
1. That is the same old boring excuse you use lol, you know very well the title of this thread is misleading. I'm amazed by some of your complete distortion of the facts.....
2. You should be focusing on our worldline, focus on what could come our way in this worldline, not strictly to the timeline of Titor's worldline. We are talking about worldlines here!!! get with the program....
3. civil unrest has increased with paramilitary police tactics and is "steadily" getting worse, you can thank the hijacked government for that.
There is so much more to add, but you will deliberately brush it off.
Maybe you should add something new here to counter the federal camo and the hijacked government abuse... show us how it's not steadily getting worse.
In related news....
Taser Legislation on the Rise.
news.google.com...
Police Brutality Charges on the Rise.
news.ncmonline.com...
the reason we can not prove the civilwar is going on and also timetravel being real is very simple , titor explains that both of these things have not happened yet(chronologically), timetravel has not yet been discovered in our timeline this is true , but titor never said that it would be by now. also outright open fighting does not start in 2004, titor never says when (exactly) this occurrs, but ranges it from 2006-2011
however i dont expect you to do this , becuase i know your unwilling to risk being compromised.
Saying that open fighting did not occur in 2005 is not proof, as has been pointed out. Titor said it would be gradual.
1. Excuse? How in the world is stating read the title an excuse? And excuse of what?
2. How is the title misleading? How is it possible for a title to be misleading?
3. Exactly what facts am I distorting? I keep talking about the civil war because that's what this thread was supposed to be about. Are you saying this thread wasn't supposed to be about that? Well then you're going to have to talk to the author of this thread....not me.
They're passing legislation to LIMIT taser use.
They're CHARGING more police with brutalitiy.
If we were in a civil war the COMPLETE OPPOSITE would be happening!
2. Again, read Titor's quote. He said during that time period open fighting would have become COMMON by then. There was obviously stuff going on before then or he WOULDN'T HAVE CALLED IT A CIVIL WAR! If he meant it was just tasers and police beating old ladies then he would have said so, but no, he said it was a civil war meaning something was happening just beyond tasers and old ladies being beat. I've said this before, that stuff wouldn't even cause a civil war in a third world country, so it's definately not going to cause one in the US.
Titor clearly states several times however that the war would start in 2004. There would be civil unrest and monthly waco type (
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
In Titor's worldline there was a civil war.
In this one there's not one
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
In his, the west collapsed in 2005 or whenever
In this one it has not (any suggestion otherwise is just silly and not being realistic)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
In his worldline a bunch of starving disease ridden people magically create time travel after much of the world is destroyed
In this world, that's not being realistic.
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
Did you know that there are Chinese Troops currently stationed along the border in Texas with Mexico under the UN banner? I got this from that 1 hour show in the above link.
Originally posted by Roth Joint
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
Did you know that there are Chinese Troops currently stationed along the border in Texas with Mexico under the UN banner? I got this from that 1 hour show in the above link.
That sounds very alarming indeed.
John Titor
TimeTravel_0 : No...more like city angainst country.'
wyrmkin_37 : majorities against minorities.......
TimeTravel_0 : Yes.
TimeTravel_0 : You know...guns versus no guns.
TimeTravel_0 : Power versus no power.
wyrmkin_37 : time to pour another jack and coke
TimeTravel_0 : Un troops versus no UN troops.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Excellent!
Thank you for proving my point!
Now if we were in a civil war or even a police state (which Titor never mentioned) do you think that stuff would be happening!?
They're passing legislation to LIMIT taser use.
They're CHARGING more police with brutalitiy.
If we were in a civil war the COMPLETE OPPOSITE would be happening!
''The bad news is that these kinds of shootings are easily covered up. All these officers have to do is speak to what their state of mind was and they're going to be exonerated. And their state of mind was, 'I was scared'.''
George Green, Former Washington Insider, Once Asked To Be President Carter's Campaign Finance Chairman, who once rubbed shoulders with the neocon 'movers and shakers' has now changed teams, and is trying to spread the truth in order to stop the New World Order imperial fascism.
"I remember being flown to Aspen in a private jet and then being asked to be the Democratic Finance Chairman for the Carter election," said Green last week on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal. "I remember then saying I was a Republican and then Paul Volcker, leaned over and said "That's OK, kid. It doesn't matter, we [Federal Reserve Owners and their cronies] control them both."
www.thereporter.com...
A 'North American Union' will drag us down
Article Launched: 12/10/2006 07:37:20 AM PST"
... And the truth shall make you free" - but can we ever really learn the truth when so many of the mainstream media are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, as are members of Congress, the departments of State and Defense, business and industry, universities and even the judiciary?
How many readers are aware that our government is planning a North American Union right now? Planning for this union began in March 2005, when the governments of the United States, Canada and Mexico agreed to create the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
Here are the "short-term" goals, to be achieved before 2010:
John Titor: “From the age of 8 to 12 [2006 to 2010]………By that time [2010], it was pretty clear that we were not going back to what we had and the division between the "cities" and the "country" was well defined.”
• A common security perimeter, patrolled jointly by Mexican, Canadian and American authorities
• Total free movement of all people within the "North American Union" - which means more Mexican immigration into the United States.
John Titor: “I don't remember a great deal about media coverage during the civil conflicts. I would probably characterize it the same way you see coverage of Waco, Ruby Ridge and Elian Gonzalez.” (immigration issue)
• Harmonizing regulations among the three countries, which will water down protection for American workers to the level of Mexican workers.
• A common external tariff and trade policy. Shortly after the partnership was created, the left- leaning Council on Foreign Relations released its playbook for what is to come after the short-term goals have been accomplished:
• A common defense structure, linking the armed forces of Mexico, Canada and the United States.
• A North America Investment Fund to encourage American and Canadian companies to relocate to Mexico.
Question: You mention the nature of Canadians but I don't think you mentioned the impact of all of this on that country. Would you?
John Titor: “There’s not a great deal I know about Canada except to say they were pretty much in the same type of conflict. They did have the Dew Line you know.”
• A permanent supra-national tribunal above the U.S. Constitution to resolve trade disputes.
John Titor: “ While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you….. Get a copy of the US Constitution and read it. The original Constitution itself was not the problem it was the ignorance of the people that lived under it. Why do you think the Bill of Rights was written?”
• A coordinated social safety net that would give Mexicans a piece of the American Social Security system.
• A North American Inter-Parliamentary Group.
At a press conference at Baylor University on March 23, 2005, attended by President Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts, a reporter asked, "Keeping in mind, in front of us, the European Union, how much is this partnership a first step towards continental integration?" Bush responded, "The vision that you asked about in your question as to what kind of union might there be, I see one based upon free trade, that would entail commitment to markets and democracy, transparency, rule of law."
John Titor: “Yes, I think the New World Order idea tried to establish itself. I would consider them the combination of the old U.S. federal system, Europe, Canada and Australia.” (Australia investor Macquerie)
In Texas, plans are under way to construct new toll roads and to sell existing roads to a foreign consortium which would then convert them to toll roads. The tolls would be the funding mechanism to construct a massive NAFTA Super Highway connecting Mexico with Canada.
Question: One last question, how did Texas fare during the war?
John Titor: “Texas is still there but Spanish is a lot more popular.”
In April 2006, the Texas Department of Transportation released a 4,000-page document that describes a corridor 1,200-feet wide - the size of four football fields. It will have five northbound and five southbound lanes - three in each direction for cars; two, for trucks. In the middle will be pipelines and rail lines. It will also have a 200-foot-wide utility corridor.
Plans call for building some 4,000 miles of super-corridors through Texas during the next 50 years. The routes will ultimately proceed to Kansas City, Mo., where a Mexican Customs facility will be built. This spring, city officials signed off on a 50-year lease for the Mexican facility, with an option for 50 more years.
Supercargo ships, carrying goods manufactured by cheap labor in the far East and China, will unload in Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico, avoiding the costly longshoremen in Los Angeles or Long Beach. The containers will be loaded onto non-union Mexican railroads bound for Monterrey, Mexico. There they will be loaded onto non-union Mexican semi-trailers that will cross the border at Laredo, Texas, to begin their journey north along the first leg of the planned NAFTA Super Highway.
Why are the "talking heads" not reporting this? The source of my information comes from The New American, The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Immigration Watch, Free the Eagle and Middle American News.
www.aim.org...
The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) is its official name. Critics call it the NAFTA Highway. The publicized TTC is being treated as a regional story because of the disruption to Texas farmers and other property owners.
mrzine.monthlyreview.org...
The reason for all the deception is not hard to fathom. Maintaining profit margins, the number one priority of US capitalism, is becoming increasingly difficult in the face of declining aggregate real income in the nation. The current solution to this historical problem of capitalist production is the mass importation of cheap goods manufactured in the maquiladoras of Mexico and the sweatshops of the Far Eastern Pacific Rim that are being imported through the ports of Mexico and the mass exploitation of both documented and undocumented immigrant labor in the US.
www.motherjones.com...
Governor Mitch Daniels (a very immoral and unscrupulous person, former vice-president of Lilly–read: Bush & Co, and now, director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Bush Administration!) ) this month announced that Illinois and Indiana will partner to build the Illiana Expressway, a new freeway from Illinois' I-57 into Indiana, with private funding.
Daniels was behind last year's biggest road privatization deal, the takeover of the 157-mile Indiana Toll Road by a consortium made up of MIG (Australian toll-road operator) and the Spanish road operator Cintra that agreed to pay $3.8 billion for a 75-year lease. Goldman Sachs was Indiana's financial adviser on the deal.
Daniels has also announced his intent to pursue the controversial extension of I-69 as part of a proposed NAFTA highway to Mexico. Indiana's part of the project would involve a privately funded, 75-mile bypass through five counties in the southern part of the state.
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
Just found this bit of information from the Titor Archives -
"07 November 2000 21:23 (about the future) 34
pamela: 6.what started the war? and who fought in it? who won?what countries were destroyed and what survived?
timetravel_0: Wow...that's a big question. There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years. In 2015, Russia launches a nuclear strike against the major cities in the United States (which is the "other side" of the civil war from my perspective), China and Europe . The United States counter attacks. The US cities are destroyed along with the AFE (American Federal Empire)...thus we (in the country) won. The European Union and China were also destroyed. Russia is now our largest trading partner and the Capitol of the US was moved to Omaha Nebraska"
Q:How do most people die during the war?
John:In this order: Starvation - Disease - Bullet Wounds - Radiation.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
What do I think?
Gun shots on my block downtown last night... again.