Antifa attacks journalist in Portland

a reply to: operation mindcrime

I made no lables at all, again comprehesion to reality.

they call themselves "antifa" I call them idiots. you still defended them beating a journalist

now you are trying to cover your actions.

Give up while you still have "some" dignity left.

you wont, but that would be my advise, these folks are not civil.

Civil disobedience is Ghandi, not beating people in the streets.

you are welcome to search and research Ghandi.

a reply to: operation mindcrime

I love this excuse you always see coming from the left

Blm , Antifa, heck even the black Hebrew nationalist and other left wing groups have riots or extreme violence and we can’t blame he group because they were just individuals

Strange I never hear about that when a right wing group has someone use violence

The southern poverty law center calls them hate groups, the media repeats it, and most in the left judges the whole group as hateful

a reply to: Grambler

They sure like to give up on their collectivism when it isn't convenient.

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Grambler

They sure like to give up on their collectivism when it isn't convenient.

It’s hilarious

The lengths people will go to downplay violent groups on the left is actually impressive albeit sad

Everyone with a maga hat is a racist

But we can’t judge masked thugs calling themselves Antifa as the actual Antifa and must judge each individual

So dumb

a reply to: thedigirati

Nahh...civil disobedience was Thoreau. Read up on that..

You want to ban antifa, ban antifa. You think that will put a stop to reporters getting their heads bashed in?

How about not hidding behind the label(both sides) and actually arrest the peope bashing heads in?

" well Mindcrime, the police is corrupt and on the side of antifa"
That's exactly where civil disobdience comes into play..

Peace

a reply to: operation mindcrime

I didn't say ban anyone, I am willing to give my life for freedom of speech, violence is not speech.

Please do not try and imply I want to ban "antifa" I don't, they can protest and scream and yell all they like, I support that,
becuase I took an oath to support it, and it didn't have an expiration date.

I do not support violence of any kind, because I am very good at violence, and yet I never have to use it (Sun Tzu know your enemy)

you keep trying to imply things not said, becuase you know you cannot defend the thinngs YOU have said.

a reply to: operation mindcrime

You can’t ban an ideology.

And if people didn’t tacitly support this ideology the thread wouldn’t be 23 pages long.

a reply to: thedigirati

But your friend...?

My friend thinks that when you add a few here and there you get many

That was about a lot of things associated with antifa. I'm not saying you never said thi gs but you seem to imply it...

Peace

a reply to: DBCowboy

And what exactly is the Americans version of antifa's ideology?

To me it seems to be a whole lot about left vs right.

Peace

a reply to: operation mindcrime

My friend is my wife and my avatar picture, she is always 18 inches from me for the last 27 years.

It's nice to have friends, and I would post more of what she says however it would violate the T&C of ATS.

She married a US Marine, what do you expect?

Please be my guest and quote any post were I even imply it.

maybe you are wishing I implied it, I have shown twice your lack of comprehension with reality, you made the claim, back it up

Are people still defending the gay bashers?
This guy was a known gay journalist.
He was followed, shouted down, and publicly beaten on the last day of pride month.
There is no excuse for this behavior. EVER.

Well since you asked...

I wrote earlier:

But now you are saying that the acts of a few represent the whole....the entire movement is violent because a few act like idiots. What Antifa shouts or what they stand for shouldn't be a problem, right? Freedom of speech and all..

To which you replied...

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: operation mindcrime

I have a question to you,when you say the actions of a few, do you mean the folks online saying they are going to assault others or the few that go out and assault folks in the streets?

which are the few you are referencing, asking for a friend.

My friend thinks that when you add a few here and there you get many.

Again I am not saying you want to ban antifa but you seem to suggest that a few here and there add up to a lot.

I'm saying that if 20 guys beat up a reporter, 20 guys should be arrested. That's where the equation ends.

Peace

a reply to: operation mindcrime

yes when you add 20 online with 20 in the streets that is 40, it's simple math

no where does that say ban, or even imply ban, it implies your "few" are more than 3, 40 is more than 20 or 3, it could even be called "many".


thank you for being honest that you cannot find anywhere that I impled banning antifa. Maybe you can get your friend you mentioned that was ignored at the resturant to explain this for you.

a reply to: thedigirati

I think the kkk, the bloods and the crypts, and many other groups are bad

That doesn’t mean we “ban” them. It’s impossible and meaningless

What we do is recognize these groups as dangerous and not only condemn them as a society, but have law enforcement be aware of possible criminal activities they are involved in

The same should be true of Antifa

But for some reason the police in Portland stand down with them

People in the main stream defend or make excuses for them

And even posters on here say we can’t judge the whole group

a reply to: Grambler

Antifa has a history of storming Portland city hall and using intimidation to get what they want.

The mayor and staff have repeatedly kowtowed to them.

They are the new Brownshirts.

a reply to: DBCowboy

well, according to history of antifa, they are on their way to making an American Hitler.

That is just plain awesome.

Best fail eveah!!!

but what do I know, I'm just an old white rich guy, I'm the "problem"🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁👌👌👌😉😉😉

a reply to: thedigirati

People like you and that pesky Constitution keep getting in the way of their fascism.

Hater.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Oh you mean that piece of parchment that I swore to uphold, yeah.

I'm an Obstructionist, just like MY President.

OMG he took an oath too.

I know swearing is bad an all, shame on us.

originally posted by: operation mindcrime
a reply to: thedigirati

Nahh...civil disobedience was Thoreau. Read up on that..

You want to ban antifa, ban antifa. You think that will put a stop to reporters getting their heads bashed in?

How about not hidding behind the label(both sides) and actually arrest the peope bashing heads in?

" well Mindcrime, the police is corrupt and on the side of antifa"
That's exactly where civil disobdience comes into play..

Peace

So then you agree with the groups battling Antifa?

The terror group ANTIFA is planning violence in Washington D.C. this 4th of July week.

The city should outlaw people with masks, just like they outlaw back-packs at certain events/locations.

All masked people get arrested, except women wearing the Muslim scarf.