It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: UKTruth
You continue to make things up because your argument that the Govt has be part of a defamation case...
The Constitution only prevents the government from curtailing your free speech.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Incorrect. The constitution prevents the Govt from passing any law to impinge on the free speech of ALL citizens...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: UKTruth
Incorrect. The constitution prevents the Govt from passing any law to impinge on the free speech of ALL citizens...
Wrong. Multiple laws have been passed that were upheld by the Supreme Court that dispel your misguided notion of unlimited free speech.
Including those covering defamation.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: UKTruth
There is no view being argued about unlimited free speech.
You keep saying 'no law'. Guess what? There's laws and the Supreme Court upheld them.
originally posted by: UKTruth
The 1st Amendment is clear in that the Govt can 'pass no law...'.
The very reason you have been wrong from the start is that defamation laws do conflict to the 1st Amendment.
Roku added that it didn’t have any financial ties with Jones or InfoWars, nor any commercial or advertising relationship. It further noted that “to our knowledge” Infowars had not violated Roku’s content policies, but that “if we determine a channel violates these policies, it will be removed.”
Within hours, however, the streaming service faced intense backlash across social media and appeared to reverse its decision. “After the InfoWars channel became available,” the company wrote on its Twitter page, “we heard from concerned parties and have determined that the channel should be removed from our platform. Deletion from the channel store and platform has begun and will be completed shortly.”
originally posted by: UKTruth
They still exist...
...but Judges must pay due consideration to the 1st Amendment when assessing defamation.