It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: CoramDeo
I love Mexican food but, have you tried Canadian cuisine?
Here are 17 of our best traditional dishes: Link
#11 is particularly delishious if you fancy candy for desert...and don't mind eating a little bit of snow (not yellow, of course, lol).
Aww man some of that looks proper tasty! Hit me up with a Poutine and some of that beef pie ( with gravy).......🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤝
TheTaff
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
BBC message alert has just told me that:
"US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis to quit Trump cabinet, citing importance of respecting allies and building partnerships"
WTF... is this 4D chess around govt shutdown/martial law?
Also... does this mean getting an Acting Defense Secretary?
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: CoramDeo
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: CoramDeo
POTUS Mimics Anon's Tweet About Building the Wall; Adds Nat Security Enabling Army Corp. Engineers
2593
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 12 Dec 2018 - 11:22:53 AM
twitter.com...📁
Excellent Q, VIP Patriot!
twitter.com...📁
NAT SEC had to be included for reasons I'm sure you can understand.
Think Green/Red Castle.
Think MIL.
Happy Holidays!
Q
Red Castle is corps of engineers insignia www.usace.army.mil...
Then there is
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Department of Defense
Us Highway 231 North
Greencastle, IN 46135
I'm well aware of every single one of the points that you are making. What I'm saying is, the military cannot, by fiat, or by order of President redirect funds allocated to specific programs.
We had this discussion when the Omnibus bill passed. I spent hours going through every line to find something that would give a clue that there was some vagueness in any of the line items that would allow for construction of a wall.
Unfortunately, there is no vague line items. In fact, each line items is so specific that it boggles the mind that someone is that specific. Literally, the line items specify who gets how many vehicles, cases of ammunition, etc.
So with it being that specific, someone, somewhere, should be able to point to the place where funds can be moved or have been directly allocated to build the wall. It's easy. Just point to the page in one of the two documents in my previous post. Or, If it's somewhere else, codified, I'll take that as well.
If it was that easy to do it that way, then why has it taken two years for that to not happen?
The reality is that you can't just re-allocate funds in the military budget for things like this. Each one of those line items pays a military contractor for the goods or service being provided, for the salaries of DoD personnel, or services that support our men and women in uniform. So, if what Q says is true, which it is not, then someone is getting screwed; either the men and women in uniform, or some civilian working for a contracted agency (Boeing, Raytheon, BAE, etc.) will have to do with less, maybe even their job, as a result of such a decision.
I'm sorry, I'm hard pressed to believe that there are billions of dollars in discretionary spending just floating around waiting to solve a problem. If that were the case, then why have a budget?
I'm really asking to be proven wrong here, but I'm not going to take the word of Q with absolutely no corroborating evidence to contradict my point.
Cor, If I'm not mistaken "The wall" is the soldiers at this point, coupled with areas already under construction from prior obama comits. The wall won't be completed any time soon as a wholesale effort, so wall indicates blockade, not necessarily funded contractor construction - it is needed now not ten years form now.
So where does "active war funding" arrive in the inbox of disbursements RE: the listed agencies? I'm actually not sure how "money' is budgeted for a war when one has no idea what is needed. So there has to be a mechanism that allows a war to have infinite money in order to prevent "uh, over budget, we have to go home..."
National Security is the issue and what that triggers. Consider the "budget" is published, but how absurd would it be to publish the war budget.
ADD: It would seem that some of the issue is the land itself - states rights etc. The gov can, but should not, just rage onto land and start doing X - U1 Oregon for example. I don't know the details, but part of the allocation issue has to be tied up in that too.
The Defense Department expects to spend roughly $15.3 billion in Syria next year,
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
BBC message alert has just told me that:
"US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis to quit Trump cabinet, citing importance of respecting allies and building partnerships"
WTF... is this 4D chess around govt shutdown/martial law?
Also... does this mean getting an Acting Defense Secretary?
This is causing John Brennan to go into full-throttle PANIC mode.
twitter.com...
Hang tight and buckle up. We are entering a new phase (movie 3?).
Speaking at his annual news conference, Putin warned that “it could lead to the destruction of civilization as a whole and maybe even our planet.”....As for what he described as U.S. reluctance to extend the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty, he said: “You aren’t interested? You don’t need it? OK, we will survive. ... But it will be very bad for the whole of humankind, because it would take us to a very dangerous area.”
"Be Prepared to be Blown Away" - Intel Update from Q Frankie Z 12-20-18 12/20/2018 03:04:00 PM Intel, Update DO YOU KNOW THAT TRUMP ALREADY HAS THE MONEY FOR THE WALL? LOOK AT THE FINE PRINT IN THE LAST BUDGET FOR THE MILITARY. IT'LL LOOK LIKE A GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN. BUT IN REALITY IT'LL BE 9 DAYS FOR THE NEW GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER. IT'S HILARIOUS. TRUMP'S PLAYING THEM LIKE FOOLS. 380 CONGRESS PEOPLE WILL BE ARRESTED. SPECIAL ELECTIONS TO REPLACE THEM. 63,300 TOTAL ARRESTS TO HAPPEN. ENJOY THE SHOW. THE 10 DAYS OF DARKNESS WILL BE THE LAST 5 DAYS OF DECEMBER AND FIRST 5 DAYS OF JANUARY. I HAVE AMAZING SOURCES. PLUS A TRUE PATRIOT Q FOLLOWER. WWG1WGA. SIT BACK, RELAX, AND ENJOY THE SHOW. P.S. HAVE 10 DAYS OF FOOD, WATER, AND WHATEVER YOU NEED TO GET THROUGH. ALL STORES WILL BE CLOSED. ONE MORE PIECE OF INFORMATION. IRS IS BEING SHUT DOWN FOR GOOD. TAXES ARE ILLEGAL. THERE ARE ALSO 2 CONSTITUTIONS. ONE FAKE AND ILLEGAL THAT WE HAVE BEEN LIVING UNDER SINCE 1871. TRUMP WILL BRING BACK THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION. MANY CHANGES ARE ABOUT TO HAPPEN. LOOK UP "THE ORGANIC ACT OF 1871" ON FEDERALJACK.COM. BE PREPARED TO BE BLOWN AWAY. Q FRANKIE Z
The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America. Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States. The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: pavil
From the reaction of some Republican Congressmen today (like Lindsay Graham), you'd think that they, or their close buddies, were benefitting from that $15 Billion annual expenditure on Syria.
originally posted by: NightFlight
Fox says the House just approved the bill with the wall funding in it.
Well, now its not there anymore? WTF?
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
2636
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
20 Dec 2018 - 1:41:41 PM
ALICE & MAD HATTER.
Q
qmap.pub...
The Hatter is a fictional character in Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and its sequel Through the Looking-Glass. He is very often referred to as the Mad Hatter, though this term was never used by Carroll. The phrase "mad as a hatter" pre-dates Carroll's works. The Hatter and the March Hare are referred to as "both mad" by the Cheshire Cat, in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland in the seventh chapter titled "A Mad Tea-Party".
"I put my hand upon 'Q's' hip
When I dip 'Q' dip we dip
'Q' put your hand upon my hip
When 'Q' dip I dip we dip"
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Obvious google bias is obvious.