It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ctj83
a reply to: Baablacksheep
Bots are here. I'm not sure about Direne, she struggled to parse anything with slightly non standard formatting and or slightly modified references and poor spelling. I'd put that down to not being a native English speaker though. Which says something in of itself.
originally posted by: AdamE
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear
And to mirageman, Killgore and the gang...
Can you see the light!? (Dan Aykroyd or James Brown, think it was JB)) What light!? (John Belushi)
The assumption has always been that the eye mainly senses light, whose local distribution is transmitted to the brain in a kind of copy by a mosaic of impulses. Suppose we held otherwise, that the nervous apparatus in the eye is itself devoted to detecting certain patterns of light and their changes, corresponiding to particular relations in the visible world. If this should be the case, the laws found by using small spots of light on the retina may be true and yet, in a sense, be misleadinig. Consider, for example, a bright spot appearing in a receptive field. Its actual and sensible properties include not only intensity, but the shape of its edge,its size, curvature, contrast, etc.
perception of colour was an internal experience that made him give up on "...the notion that there was an external independent world to be known by the observer," and to conclude that, "our world, as the world which we bring forth in coexistence with others, will always have a mixture of irregularity and mutability, that combination of solidity and shifting sand..."
Can you pull it all together? Tell us why they are actually relevant and how it links to what happened at Rendlesham in a clear concise way.
Also, as Kev asked, who is providing this information to you? Don't be put off telling us.
They could be yanking your chain so you waste time and flood this thread with irrelevant information. Think about it. Why would they offer this information to YOU. There may be a hidden agenda.
One final thing that bugs me. Why does the robot voice sound like one from seventies / eighties computer hardware? Why not like Alexa? Created with microwaves perhaps, not digital technology? Or simply to emphasise the ‘otherness’ If however the voice is digital - then what are the chances the phenomena is here, right now? As a forum member? Personally, I think not... but still.
We both know you are just posting standard, off-the-shelf, and not actually special information, that is easily found on the Internet, nearly all of the time. Now.. that's not meant to be insulting.. you are doing detective work.. and the 'scientists' who feed you info are doing detective work.. and I like that just fine..
you are working backwards from known facts, in an attempt to find the beginning..
Also, the quantum consciousness stuff is about a generation back on the current research.. so I'm assuming you are talking to someone older and not as well informed as the cutting edge info is..
Adam.. a question for you.. please tell me (if you are willing), that your first name might be Adam.. or Adam is a name you like or it's something absolutely human in any case.. and that it's not a reference to the 'pre-fall Adamic mind' of various cults or even Kabbalah?