Avenatti releases name and account of accuser

BOOM!

a reply to: scraedtosleep

link

This is absolute bull#. I will come out and say it blatantly - I dont believe a word of this crap. So, just to get it straight, these high school boys repeatedly gang raped many many girls from the same school, yet not one of them was charged or arrested, not one of them questioned or disciplined, until right now, when coincidentally one of the men is up for the Supreme Court? All these girls supposedly, over all these years, how long has Kav been in the public eye as a judge or lawyer? Now, they all decide to come out of the woodwork?

This should cause every single on of us to pause and think about the silly crap we all did or didnt do when we were younger. This is setting a terrible terrible precedent.

a reply to: Grambler

Where there is smoke, there's fire.

3 accusers now?

it's not looking good.

a reply to: xuenchen

So if the documents don't look official their lying.

But if they do look official ...their lying.

This is why some people don't take you seriously.

Her accusations are very strange. She never actually accused him of rape but tries to imply it. When she mentions she was raped she said kevenagh was there. However, she doesn't say he was involved.

mobile.twitter.com...

a reply to: Arnie123

Clearly all you care about is getting someone on your 'side' on the court.

Your mind is made up no matter what happens.

Admit it

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: xuenchen

So if the documents don't look official their lying.

But if they do look official ...their lying.

This is why some people don't take you seriously.

Cause he don't care
Its very clear

Minds are made up and they won't see it any other way.
Pretty evident

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Silly crap?

I'm sorry but I didn't go around drugging women without them knowing so they could be raped later.

This isn't a silly crap situation. It's a criminal one.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Appears that yours is as well

a reply to: Grambler

So I am a little confused.
I am unsure of what to think about this entire situation.
The Kavanaugh nomination was announced July 9th.
Feinstein was given "the letter" in July.
Now it is late September and we are just now getting these complaints?
Am I to believe the people making these complaints had no issues until a date to vote was named?
What were they sitting at home and saw him on tv and realized "oh its THAT kavanaugh"?

Was Kavanaugh being a Federal judge NOT enough for these women to come forward?

The timing and those involved make me hesitant to believe what are horrible allegations. Interestingly the allegations have gotten progressively worse as the vote date gets closer. As if they realized "groping" was not enough so we need to find worse. Then "poof" it appears out of nowhere.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Grambler

Where there is smoke, there's fire.

Not really. Sometimes the smoke is.. Just smoke.

3 accusers now?

Yup. And keep in mind that none so far could find anything or anyone to corroborate their stories.

it's not looking good.

For who?

originally posted by: BlueAjah
I read it. I find nothing in there other than Kavanaugh and others drank too much and got roudy. He admitted this.

No where does she specifically say that she saw him specifically spike the punch.

When she was assaulted, she just says he was at the party. Not that he specifically did anything.

She says guys stood in line. She does not say that he did.

But IF it happened and he knew about it but did nothing to stop nor called the cops that makes him an accessory.

If he knew and did nothing that would speak a lot about his character as a decent human being don't you think?

I am very busy right now and can only glance over this

But one of my intial thought are this

She claims to have been at several parties when she saw women being drinker and raped

Yet she kept going

If she also gave girls booze at these parties after she knew they were being gang raped, isn’t she then an accessory to these rapes?

1) if you ever bought/gave anyone any drink or drug, you have drugged another person. If anyone ever gave you beer or any drug, you have been drugged by another person

2) 1st student: what do you want to do this weekend
2nd student: lets go to the rapey party
3 rd student: that sounds good.
All together: yeah, lets go

a reply to: Grambler

Not only did they not step up and say anything to any adults or police or teachers or anything, they kept on attending these parties, kept on drinking with these same men, and let their fellow women be repeatedly raped without impunity.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep

originally posted by: BlueAjah
I read it. I find nothing in there other than Kavanaugh and others drank too much and got roudy. He admitted this.

No where does she specifically say that she saw him specifically spike the punch.

When she was assaulted, she just says he was at the party. Not that he specifically did anything.

She says guys stood in line. She does not say that he did.

But IF it happened and he knew about it but did nothing to stop nor called the cops that makes him an accessory.

If he knew and did nothing that would speak a lot about his character as a decent human being don't you think?

And so this woman is admitting to heing an accessory to rape by your definition

So the accusation against Kavanaugh is coming from an admitted accessory to rape

I assume she will be calling for charges to be pressed against herself

originally posted by: WalterTilley
a reply to: TinySickTears

Appears that yours is as well

Bull#.
Dont put words in my mouth.

I've commented on multiple threads about this and they have all been the same.

None of us know for sure.
She could be lying.
He could be lying.
It should be looked into and testimony heard.

That's what I keep saying.

I am not the one who's mind is made up

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
So from what she says the parties were all "rapey" but she continued to go to them? How does that make any sense?

But, it's not really about her and her behavior.

Is it?

(this is not a "side", it's an observation)