Avenatti releases name and account of accuser

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Grambler

And so this woman is admitting to heing an accessory to rape by your definition

Not my definition. I think it's the law isn't it?

And maybe a case could be made if it is shown that she knew about rapes but said nothing.

So assuming she can produce no physical evidence...

How does being an admitted accessory to rape affect her credibility?

Credibility with who? If you mean with me, your forgetting that I am withholding my judgement till after her hearings.

If you mean with the fbi or judicial committee. Well you'll just have to wait and see like the rest of us.

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: Arnie123

Clearly all you care about is getting someone on your 'side' on the court.

Your mind is made up no matter what happens.

Admit it

If it pisses you off, GOOD 😉

You're a joke and I could care less about your post.

come on dude, don't let emotions ruin things, detach.

Naw, we got ignorants automatically beleiving heresay.

If a girl screams sexual assualt, the stigma is, she is automatically right.

I don't, won't subscribe to that and vehemently oppsoe it.

So from my perspective I look at it this way. In 1982, Kavanaugh would have been 17 and a junior, all these parties he went too would have been 1982-1983, cause seriously how many parties did you attend as a freshman or sophomore? So we have the calendar from 82, which basically shows it wasn’t him. This leaves 83, which ok might be nice to have the info on, but realistically come on, he already shot this out of the park with the first calendar. Is it possible that something happened to these girls, sure. However, at this point I think this is turning into treason, slander, and a usurpation of the rule of law. There has been absolutely no evidence to prove anything at all. Not one piece. It’s all hearsay and special action from 35 years ago. Peoples minds fade. People use fake names. Hell if I was running a train on some chick at a party, I’d use a fake name too. Unless there is any evidence this is slander.

Camain

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Grambler
Where there is smoke, there's fire.
3 accusers now?
it's not looking good.

True believers don't care! Same reason Farrow's reputed N-word tape won't cost the Cheeto Messiah any votes.

lol, yeah but you don't care either, because "Anti-Trump", different side, same coin.

Good job.

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Grambler
Where there is smoke, there's fire.
3 accusers now?
it's not looking good.

True believers don't care! Same reason Farrow's reputed N-word tape won't cost the Cheeto Messiah any votes.

about as relevant as this

Legal dictionary terminology such as affidavit, statement, testimony and deposition are very much NOT interchangeable. Each has it's place in the course of justice activity or law enforcement activity.

Swinging around 10 dollar words in front of lower IQ common folk is meant to spike emotional responses for a mob rule riot. Everybody to their pitchforks and torches, hurry!

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: Annee

Actually, her behavior very well might be an issue, if she knew about this activity and never reported it to the police.

No, it's not.

She is not being considered for the USSC.

The only behavior in question is Kavanaugh's.

You sure about that:

www.law.cornell.edu...

Are we charging someone with a Felony?

sexual assault is a felony in maryland and it has no statute of limitation
a simple police report from this "accuser" would end this posturing bs

According to the pdf of her allegations against Kav, she made those statements under penalty of perjury. So guess we will have to wait till the chips fall where they may on this one.


Mission accomplished, appointment delayed.

a reply to: camain

Just let the train wreck continue.

Kav is and will continue to stay strong. I support Kav and not liars like Ford.

This is clearly a dim tactic, nuclear option, character assassination. This is there, we need to stop Kav at all cost.

Not sure people understand the breakdown in ethics and morality within the dims party to get what they want.

a reply to: camain

Thats the thing though, all these people supposedly knew each other already, so using a fake name would have no effect. This is supposedly friends/classmates raping friends/classmates.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Have you ever even been to a college party?

a reply to: seeker1963

Money talks.

Who cared about rep when you got some serious cash?

a reply to: BlueAjah


I have, UGA.

your point?

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
How does anyone seriously believe that at these parties there was a literal line of guys waiting to rape drugged up, passed out women, and not ONE SINGLE PERSON had the balls to say something or put a stop to it?

Guy at Party: "Gee, that sure is a long line for the guys bathroom"
Other guy at Party: "Nah dude. Thats the rape line, Kavanaugh throws the best parties, huh?"
Guy at Party: "Oh OK, cool....pass the chips"

Riiiiiiiiiiiight.....

Well to be fair when I was younger I did not realize that males tend to get harder the longer they hold their pee. A girl may have noticed the bulges and misinterpreted why they were standing in line all impatient like and adjusting their pants.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Have you ever even been to a college party?

Yes. But I fell to see what that has to do with anything??

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: Annee

Actually, her behavior very well might be an issue, if she knew about this activity and never reported it to the police.

No, it's not.

She is not being considered for the USSC.

The only behavior in question is Kavanaugh's.

You sure about that:

www.law.cornell.edu...

Are we charging someone with a Felony?

sexual assault is a felony in maryland and it has no statute of limitation
a simple police report from this "accuser" would end this posturing bs

According to the pdf of her allegations against Kav, she made those statements under penalty of perjury. So guess we will have to wait till the chips fall where they may on this one.


Mission accomplished, appointment delayed.

That's another odd thing. I dont think she CAN say they are under penalty of perjury. I believe that has to be done by either deposition or sworn testimony in front of a court.

I could write that at the end if everything I write but it doesnt make it true.

a reply to: camain

So we have the calendar from 82, which basically shows it wasn’t him.

How do you figure that? The calendar shows that he attended multiple parties during that summer.

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
How does anyone seriously believe that at these parties there was a literal line of guys waiting to rape drugged up, passed out women, and not ONE SINGLE PERSON had the balls to say something or put a stop to it?

Guy at Party: "Gee, that sure is a long line for the guys bathroom"
Other guy at Party: "Nah dude. Thats the rape line, Kavanaugh throws the best parties, huh?"
Guy at Party: "Oh OK, cool....pass the chips"

Riiiiiiiiiiiight.....

Well to be fair when I was younger I did not realize that males tend to get harder the longer they hold their pee. A girl may have noticed the bulges and misinterpreted why they were standing in line all impatient like and adjusting their pants.

wtf?

oh lord...

This woman claims to have witnessed the gang rapes of other woman, not that she saw Kavanaugh or Judge participate other than put alcohol in punch. She WITNESSED the gang rapes yet did nothing in regards to stopping it, reporting it, or anything. In my mind this makes her as culpable as anyone who actually participated

a reply to: Vasa Croe


Just have the FBI go and talk to her. Lying to the FBI is a crime, no doubt about that.

This was another last minute ambush. A day before the hearing from the first accuser.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vasa Croe


Just have the FBI go and talk to her. Lying to the FBI is a crime, no doubt about that.

how about she just files a police report in md?
simple enough?