It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

page: 351
<< 348  349  350    352  353  354 >>

log in


posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:32 AM
Palantir, Peter Thiel’s All-Seeing Eye, Looks to a $41 Billion I.P.O.

Could this be DJT's modern day AI aka ARIIA

Palantir, the hyper-secretive data-mining company founded by Trump homie Peter Thiel and C.E.O. Alex Karp, is almost as mysterious as the clients it works for. Started in 2003 and with seed money from the C.I.A., Palantir has developed a suite of surveillance technologies that have reportedly been used by the military to hunt down Osama bin Laden.

Palantir has a team of some 2,000 engineers, half of whom are deployed to client sites to embed with Fortune 500 companies and Wall Street firms with a singular goal: to run every kilobyte of available data through an algorithm that makes traditional consultancies look like dinosaurs.

In 2014, living up to its name, Palantir began designing a new intelligence platform for ICE. Donald Trump has jacked up the military budget and Thiel, an ardent Trump campaign supporter himself, has plenty of connections with the new regime in Washington.


Palantir developed its technology by computer scientists and analysts from intelligence agencies over three years, through pilots facilitated by In-Q-Tel.

U.S. military intelligence used the Palantir product to improve their ability to predict locations of improvised explosive devices in its war in Afghanistan.

In 2012 New Orleans Police Department partnered with Palantir to create a predictive policing program. Minority Report

Palantir partner Information Warfare Monitor used Palantir software to uncover both the Ghostnet and the Shadow Network.

in 2014, they premiered Insightics, which according to the Wall Street Journal "extracts customer spending and demographic information from merchants’ credit-card records."

Very interesting company! Guess it's been heavily disected on ATS but just wanted to bump it back given the massive Q-intel drops.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:39 AM
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Reading that made me both sad and angry. Sad for the families of the CIA officers murdered. Angry that Hillary and Obama's negligence facilitated the murders.

From what I've seen, that administration spent 80% of their day, texting, e-mailing, holding meetings, and bullchitting.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:43 AM
a reply to: dashen

I'm way too excited.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:45 AM
a reply to: carewemust

So much makes me angry too.

And sick.

Trying my best to keep a sense of humour about it.

I just hope there is justice.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:49 AM

originally posted by: pheonix358

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

My reply:

And mine to you with the answer.


Congressmen on the Intel and Judicial committees re-contact witnesses who WANT to tell their story, and assist Huber/Horwitz with the Criminal Referrals sent over to them from Congress, as far back as April 2018.

These witnesses tell the Congressmen that they have NOT been contacted by Huber or Horowitz, and want to know why?

IF someone is not telling the truth, who is it? Are the witnesses lying to the Congressmen? Or, are the Congressmen lying to the media, just to keep a lid on things?

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:53 AM
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Justice is best served cold ... because you don't have to go down to their level to win.

I can't wait until they find out just how much of their apparatus is under President Trump's control and taking them out with their own legislation is just awe inspiring.

I could not write a better script.

Think of the movies and TV series this will sporn. Possibly an end to things like a transvestite Superman.


posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:01 AM
a reply to: carewemust

IF someone is not telling the truth, who is it? Are the witnesses lying to the Congressmen? Or, are the Congressmen lying to the media, just to keep a lid on things?

Every person involved can tell the truth ... and still, the truth can remain hidden.

Just as one example. Let's say Sen. Joe is as dirty as and is referred for investigation. Either he may be small fries and so they do not have the resources ... or ... they already have so much proven dirt on the subject that they don't need to.

In that case, they will not bother at this time.

People that are untrained in asking questions can ask a question and the question can be answered truthfully without any information being given up.

Q. Did you and your wife visit with witness X on 4th of November?

A. Nope, certainly not.

Because he did not visit with his wife but instead went with Aunt Flo, he can give the negative answer and even a lie detector will miss it because the question was answered honestly.

What EXACT questions were asked?


posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:03 AM
a reply to: carewemust

Someone may be lying.

Those involved have been warned not to leak.

If things are really happening and people are going to be held accountable they will be wanting to do what they are told!

Also if "they have it all" they may well not question witnesses until after an indictment is unsealed.

They already know who did what they don't need to question them and set off alarm bells.

Perhaps things will suddenly start to happen quick.

There really are signs.

Little bits of info are leaking and I think they are purposeful leaks.

Like the odd news story, if not promoted they aren't amplified.

Like George Papadopoulos and his Bongino interview.

It's huge but it's not being promoted yet.

We are getting glimpses.

Now the country just has to vote red and way more controversial stuff will happen.

They are just waiting, in the shadows stalking their prey.

The prey knows it's being watched.

I can FEEL it.

I just worry what they might do to stop it...

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:09 AM
a reply to: pheonix358

I was just assuming that you were correct when stating that the witnesses were interviewed...even though they are telling Congress that they HAVE NOT been contacted, but want to be. They want to tell Huber/Horowitz their story.

If Congress is telling the media that Huber or Horowitz has NOT contacted these witnesses, is that the truth? It's just a rhetorical question though, since neither you or I know for sure what's really going on. I'm only repeating what Congressional Investigators are telling reporters.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:13 AM
a reply to: tiredoflooking

That's an excellent point you make!

If as Q says, the investigators already "have it all", there isn't any need to interview Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Lisa Page, and other "cooperating" witnesses.

THANK-YOU for putting that statement in logical, relevant perspective, TOL!

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:17 AM
Wikileaks is not one of you

While we suspect that the "Qanon" phenomena is likely 4chan trolls engaging in a Live Action Role Play (LARP) version of the Delphic Oracle it is also clear that many are aware of its manipulative potential and will usurp it if they have not already.

Why is "Qanon" leading anti-establishment Trump voters to embrace regime change and neo-conservatism?

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:19 AM

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: FlyingFox

That tweet was from the NSA verified account.

Assange published it later on his account with a screenshot.

The spirit cooking tweet is probably on wikileaks account somewhere waaay back.


That's what I was wondering, if you viewed it or if it was just shared.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:28 AM
a reply to: FlyingFox

I didn't view the original but I remember many people shared screenshots at the time including Assange and I believe possibily Flynn?

There were many, I do think it was a legit tweet.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 01:33 AM
a reply to: XAnarchistX

Yeah yeah.

Lots of people denounce Q.

Might be part of the plan, might not be.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

That tweet was after Assange was silenced.

We don't know who was running wikileaks at that time.

Interesting to note Assange made no mention of Q before going radio silent.

He's way too smart to go spouting off about it.

Just like Trump

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 04:28 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

What’s more interesting to me is that he took a screen cap of the image that captures the bottom edge of the file name string. Why not post the original image is there anything in the metadata of the newly created image?

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 05:13 AM

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Creep Thumper

The point isn't about plans changing, it is about someone (Q) guessing wrong because they didn't have access to the details.

He thought because Trump had said something it was going to happen but if he had been a real insider he would have known it wasn't a done deal and would have waited until knowing for sure.

They didn't know for sure if the Q-Op would be a success. They thought they were gonna have to do this quick. They knew they needed a way to explain what was going on because the public would be confused about the arrests especially with the traitorous media.

But then, something happened. Q caught on like a wildfire! To be truthful, i believe, they had a Lot of contingencies for things that might go wrong, but one thing they were not prepared for was that this Q Op cooked up by the "eggheads" in the cyber intelligence departments would work much much better than expected.

Imagine when this was first presented to military brass. 4chan? The bunghole of the internet? Memes? /pol/? What are we gonna do with a bunch of ragtag misfits? The dregs, the losers, the outcasts of society? The most hopeless group of nobodies youve ever- ok you get the point...

Well, we know what happened I dont have to tell you. The Q Op had recruited an entire ARMY of American citizens, woke to the Cabal, politically aware, and seriously pissed, but with the understanding that vigilante actions or any violence goes against the plan and will not be tolerated. We are unified and selfdisciplined.

Of course, should Q give the word I am fully convinced that this could change at any time.

Which is why Trump nor his MILITARY ADVISORS would allow this unpredictable, dangerous force to be out there "on the loose" so to speak. This is something tightly controlled by military men and/or women.

Ok so, moving along now, the Q Op was successful. They never saw this coming. They just didn't have a lot of faith in the population literally bathed in propaganda from the moment they wake up until they close their eyes to go to sleep at night. Heck they/we even dream in propaganda.

Since it DID succeed, they realized, if we can hold off till midterms and VOTE some more of these suckerfish vampires Out of office, the "legal" way, the "peaceful" way, the nonviolent way, that would help us avoid a Lot of death and destruction... but obviously that would mean some things like the parade and justice being served would have to be delayed. But the BIGGEST FEAR OF ALL is losing the Republic.

Mass arrests all at once, and all the media and celebrity lapdogs would be calling it treason, and many wealthy people backing that version of things, there is a possibility we could really lose some of our great united states through succession. If they have everything on these people, and could be getting even more as we speak, more leverage, more intel, more power... then these delays are acceptable.

That is my theory of why the parade and arrests were delayed. I could, of course be wrong. Something I don't think I have ever seen you admit. Can you admit your fallibility as a mere human?

If you want to debate whether or not Q/Trump is being honest with us about The Plan, that is debatable. What is not debatable, for me at least, is Q's close relationship with Trump.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 05:23 AM
a reply to: pheonix358

Lie detector test results don't hold as evidence in a court if law.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 05:27 AM

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: dashen

He's around lyin' it up as usual.

Also plugging his "ocean charities".

Hope he gets lots of donations.

Cuz he's going to be living in a van down by Antarctica with the Nazi Yetis.

He won't be able to walk down the street.

I'm sure he already can't

His last tweet was Nov 1st so I don't know if its safe to say quite yet that hes still "around".
I hope he got picked up but if he did then I bet it will be kept quiet until after the midterms.

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 06:18 AM
re Keep your eye on the ball. #2397

This is only the second time Q uses this formulation, the first time was Jun 18 in #1510
ETA: actually here it's eyes in the plural.

The only other drop mentioning ball was Aug 14 in #1866 (snippet):

We've had the ball the entire time.

Does this ball count?

Or this one, that Peter Thiel's company Palantir is named after?

The hidden data files inside soccer ball also has been mentioned.

This one is from the inaugural ball - you get the idea: different meaning of ball...

How about the nuclear ball?

edit on 4-11-2018 by MindBodySpiritComplex because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 06:58 AM
Keep your eye on the ball. #2397
Misspellings matter. #831

Keep your eye on the...






<< 348  349  350    352  353  354 >>

log in