It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not going to continue to explain this to someone who obviously has a room temperature IQ, causing them to lack the ability to comprehend the simplest of explanations. I am a reasonable debater and find it to be a great way to learn new information, unless it's with people like you, who don't have any information to offer.
Just calling it like I see it. And yes you resorted to what normal people refer to as name calling.
Didn’t hurt anyone’s feelings as far as I can see, just pointed out what a useless and juvenile argument you make.
Ps, definitely not saying that you are useless and juvenile just saying your actions exhibit those characteristics.
I knew the informant's identity before Clapper revealed it.
Clapper didn't reveal it. It was revealed by the NYT and WaPo in an attempt frame nunes for leaking it.
He is mentioned in Luke Harding's "Collusion," which I urge you to read before you get hopelessly lost in Trump's wilderness of mirrors.
If it's going to make me make as much sense as you do, I'll pass.
Where did I ever say there was no informant?
They were monitoring Russian communications. They did not plant a spy in the Trump campaign.
Ok, you're either an insane person or you're talking about a lot of things at once, assuming a knowledge base that doesn't exist.
Before I write you off as the former, prove that it's the latter. Your last paragraph is three contradicting statements:
1: there was a spy/informant
2: It wasn't a spy/informant, it was a mole
3: there was no spy/informant/mole in the trump campaign, by the FBI
These three contentions cannot coexist how you have them. Explain fully.
originally posted by: whywhynot
BTW, emotional response has successfully once again outed you. Worthless comments only come from emotional response. It is your burden I suppose, you say you bear it well. Oh well, to each his or her own. Enjoy it.
You're so full of yourself.
You didn't even take the time to respond to what I actually said in my post. You just posted this drivel about your personal opinion about me.
It appears you may be avoiding the specifics of what I said. Considering you used logical fallacies and made obvious contradictions, I can see why you would take the chicken# way out.
I made a specific distinction in my earlier post about speculation and such.
I'm not surprised you missed it.
Here's the thing. You and others are full of #.
Plain and simple.
People such as myself are not going to buy your line of bull#, especially when you try to sell that line as "speculation".
You do not get to pass-off your idiocy and delusions as speculation.
Who do you believe leaked it to them? The FBI guards its sources religiously. In fact, it was the fear that Nunes would leak operational and personnel details to the media that has had the Republican, Trump appointed, officials running the Bureau to hesitate offering them to the congressional committee unredacted.
DOJ, FBI slow-walking release of documents hoping for a blue wave in midterms: Darrell Issa
FBI Redacted Cost of McCabe's Office Conference Table: $70,000
originally posted by: carewemust
May 29, 2018
From the early years of Barack Obama's rise through Chicago and Illinois politics, Valerie Jarrett has been by his side as the most trusted advisor. That continued into the White House.
While Barack Hussein Obama may have been nominally the president of the United States, at the heart of every one of these scandals and virtually every administration move was Valerie Jarrett, who arguably could be considered our first female president.
Jarrett, born in Iran to American parents, has been with the Obamas since her days as deputy chief of staff in the office of Chicago mayor Richard Daley, the younger. She hired Michelle Obama, then Michelle Robinson, to fill an opening in the mayor's office.
As more is learned about FBI/DOJ spying on the Trump family and Presidential campaign staff, it's becoming apparant that Obama/Jarrett were in fact, calling the shots. After Hillary Clinton lost the Presidential election that the Obama administration had rigged for her to win, the cover-up efforts to hide illegal activities began.
Source, with the newly released evidence: thewashingtonreporter.com...
Obama may CLAIM a scandal-free administration, but after Fast and Furious, the targeting of the Tea Party by the IRS, the Benghazi cover-up, Hillary's emails, to name a few... Spygate is just the latest.
In order to cover their tracks, Barack Obama and White House Adviser Valerie Jarrett ordered senior FBI and DOJ officials, including disgraced former FBI Director Jim Comey and disgraced former Attorney General Loretta Lynch to start emailing each-other with messages that would give the appearance that the White House had nothing to do with the mission to spy on the Trump Campaign, dubbed “Operation Crossfire Hurricane”.
For several months, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has tried to hold back the text messages from congress, fearing that their release might spark an uproar. After threats from Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA) to impeach Rosenstein and FBI Director Chris Wray, the text messages were turned over with what the Department of Justice calls “narrowly tailored” redactions.
It looks like Obama's Spygate scandal really is going to dwarf Watergate, doesn't it?
Maliciously redacting information before releasing documents to hide embarrassing facts is not protecting sources. It’s impeding an interesting by a branch that as the authority to provide overnight.
Redactions are about security, not embarrassing facts?