It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: nhanon
My research on who Ann Boleyn is, assuming you mean King Henry VIII's second wife, rather than another, living, one:
Ann Boleyn geneaology:
daughter of - Thomas Boleyn, 1st Earl of Wiltshire, 1477-1539 (62),
son of - Sir William Boleyn, High Sherriffs of Kent, Suffolk and Norfolk 1451-1505 (54),
son of - Sir Geoffrey Boleyn, II, Lord Mayor of london 1406-1463 (see City of London thread),
son of - Sir Geoffrey Boleyn I, 1380-1440 (60),
son of - Thomas Boleyn, 1350-1411 (61),
son of - John Boleyne, 1300-1349 (49),
son of - Nicholas Boleyne, 1260-? (?),
son of - John 1 Boleyne, 1195:1255-?
son of - Simone de Boleyne,
son of - William de Boleyne,
son of - Faramus de Boleyne, b.1069,
son of - Godfrey de Boulogne, b. 1060-1100 (40),
son of - Eustace II, Count of Boulogne, 1020-1087 (67), in Bayeaux Tapestry!,
son of - Eustace I, Count of Boulogne, 989-1049 (60), founder of House of Boulogne,
son of - Baldwin II, Count of Boulogne, 976-1033, (57),
son of - Arnulf III, Count of Boulogne, 950-990 (40),
son of - Arnulf II Count of Boulogne, 924-972 (48),
son of - Adelolf Count of Boulogne, 891-933 (42),
son of - Baldwin II "The Bald", Count of Flanders, Artois, Boulogne, and Temois KING OF JERUSALEM, 863-918 (55),
son of - Baldwin I, Count of Flanders, 835-879 (44),
Note that in Ann Boleyns era life expectancy in UK was 34, so above 50% to 80% greater than the norm! (Life expectancy over time map)
Family shield from generation after King of Jerusalm (918) was a gold shield with 3 red circles (Rothschild?):
Family shield from 1320s through to Ann Boleyn:
with eception of 2 generations...where Family shield was:
Some similarities with Rothschild Coat of Arms make up!
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Now sit back and watch 'The Swamp' be forced to eat a steaming plate of retribution for creating that POS omnibus and forcing POTUS to sign it for the sake of the military.
It will be good.
GOP and Dem are not your friends. Trump already knows that and still a lot of work to do. Perhaps he should run as independent in 2020 and found his own party.
originally posted by: FauxMulder
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: tigertatzen
Yesterday, I was saying to myself, "I wish Q had not emphasized WEDNESDAY as a BIG BOOM day!" Why? Because nothing major happened on Wednesday, and in my mind, Q's reputation for accurate predictions inched down a notch.
The post were Q mentioned Wednesday was the one that talked about the FBI opening a case on Q regarding the Texas bomber and Q's booms in attempt to shut down Q communications. He said they would fail.
Then on Wednesday the bomber was killed.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: JanAmosComenius
In English system you are a Prince when born of a monarch or a crown prince (next in line for throne) but also granted next title down of Duke.
This means that the next generation of princes just become Dukes and are no longer potential future monarchs.
It is like diluting their titles as they get further away from the crown.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: carewemust
Also, what one person calls a "Boom"...someone else may not see it that way. I desperately want Q to have a sterling reputation for accuracy. Yesterday, I was saying to myself, "I wish Q had not emphasized WEDNESDAY as a BIG BOOM day!" Why? Because nothing major happened on Wednesday, and in my mind, Q's reputation for accurate predictions inched down a notch.
This I find puzzling. You say you're aware that the booms have more than one possible meaning. Which is true.
So why then, would you place a specific expectation on the Wednesday boom? I could understand your complaint if Q had specifically stated that there would be a big boom definitely happening on Wednesday, and there being disappointment when it did not occur. However, that was not the case at all, from my perspective. So I'm curious how then did that translate to Q predictions not being accurate? As far as I can see, there was no prediction of anything...just different theories on what the words and phrases in the drop might mean.
Your analogy of religious teachings is actually perfect...because those are also open to wide interpretation. Their accuracy can only be determined by the level of belief and trust in one interpretation of something that is entirely subjective and influenced by many different factors. Does that mean that they are all right or all wrong? No...because another person will interpret their truths or lack thereof in an entirely different way.
Have you considered the possibility that you're setting yourself up for disappointment by attaching emotional energy onto one possible interpretation above all of the others?
originally posted by: Elostone
originally posted by: eisegesis
Well, that's interesting.
Bolton is CFR - Hired 3/22
Do you have a source for this?
I did not see anything about Bolton being a part of CFR anywhere in your link...perhaps I've missed something...?
"The Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil." - Genesis 3:22
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
1st - It's absolutely heartbreaking watching this gun march this morning, these kids are being manipulated, thinking they are doing a "Good" thing as the song "Sympathy for the Devil" blasts in the background....yeah, it's a catchy tune, I know.