It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
I've got to concur with the fact that this was not dam building activity. Bander-e Daylam is a coastal city. The nearest river is 18 to 20 miles south of the city. Dams are usually built in an area where the water can collect. This coastal area does not have a basin to collect water in. It is on a low plain. If you constructed a dam there, you would flood the surrounding area.
PLUS, dams are usually meant for the purpose of producing hydro electric power. But I thought the reactors were going to be used for the peacful production of electricity. Why build a dam for power, if your building a reactor for power?
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
So with the dam cover story being disproven, we are still back to "what is the source/reason behind the explosion?"
The "belly tank explaination" doesn't hold water with me. Dropping a fuel tank, even a full one is not likely to create an explosion.
Who fired the missile, and at what?
So with the dam cover story being disproven, we are still back to "what is the source/reason behind the explosion?"
the US has openly declared that they have been monitoring Iran with UCAV's
Originally posted by raven2012
So with the dam cover story being disproven, we are still back to "what is the source/reason behind the explosion?"
Since there has been all kinds of speculation this morning I might as well get in on it. What if one of these UCAV's retaliated against a SAM site outside the nuclear facility for Iran's "Common Front" agreement with Syria. This would explain the AAA fire reported earlier and the explosion near the nuclear facility, and now this threat to shoot down any UAV's over Iranian territory. I for one don't buy that Dam story that's now circulating, but I doubt we'll ever really know what happened.
the US has openly declared that they have been monitoring Iran with UCAV's
As in "unmanned combat air vehicle!!" UCAV's are different then normal recce UAV's in that they have the ability to strike a target!!
-raven
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
My measurements have Daylem being between 90 and 100 miles from Al-Faw, Iraq across the Gulf. Well within range of US and even former Iraqi missiles.
If it was an attack, Iran would not cover it up. It would use it to embrass the attacken nation. Things are not making sense at all
Originally posted by infinite
Exactly,
the US might be using Iran aircraft to attack targets to make it look like friendly fire, but that story is abit too fantastic to believe.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Yeah, a little fantastic. But how about an Iraqi silkworm? Flies low, and cruise missiles may appear as an aircraft to the untrained eye. You use the Iraqi missile so that it is not traced back to you.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
If it was just an accident, don't you think the Iranians would at least try and blame it on the US, that's what they usually do.
Originally posted by Gazrok
What a weird story...???
I seriously doubt the current CIA would be capable of the Iranian F-14 disguise maneuver mentioned above, but good wishful thinking, hehe..."
Something definitely smells funny here though, that's for sure....