It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by robertfenix
Still trying to figure out who is responsible and why they would put that much effort into it and not actually "attack" something.
Originally posted by Countermeasures
C'mon this was no failed attack, an attack would be much larger scale....
Maybe this was a psychological warning shot for the bow , or a field rehearsel test for a real attack,
One reason it might cover it up is this..
Iran might not be ready for war.
Originally posted by superdude
Remember the kid in school who would holler and kick and cry when someone did something to him/her, but would be quiet as a mouse and point fingers when he/she did something wrong? IMHO I think that is exactly what we're seeing here.
...the Bush Administration is following predictable strategies in a way that redefines the concept of brinksmanship. Human survival may depend upon the will and the ability of both the Congress and the press to focus on these relationships and to take appropriate action.
The Best Enemies Money Can Buy
Originally posted by infinite
There is a river near Bander-e Rig, but there is no reason to build a dam in Bander-e Deylam.
of course there is something up,
this story is not being covered in the news anymore
phreak
Why build a dam for power, if your building a reactor for power?
. The nearest river is 18 to 20 miles south of the city
So with the dam cover story being disproven
I would think you would keep that quiet.
infinite
so far, we've debunked majority of the reports put forward
warning attack, meaning they could strike anytime.
Iran might not be ready for war.
quote: Originally posted by superdude
Remember the kid in school who would holler and kick and cry when someone did something to him/her, but would be quiet as a mouse and point fingers when he/she did something wrong? IMHO I think that is exactly what we're seeing here.
So who's being the quietest on this one?
A powerful explosion in southern Iran which raised jitters of a possible attack on the country's nuclear installations, was a result of road blasting, a senior security official said.
"It was an explosion set deliberately to blast through rock and open a road," Supreme National Security Council spokesman Agha Mohammadi told AFP. "In no circumstances was it an attack against the Islamic republic's nuclear installations."
Source
Originally posted by chaosrain
As for the Warning Shot theory...why? WRT air attacks it is clear that either the US or Israel could launch a highly successful attack against Iran using a myriad of air equipment from cruise missiles, to UCAV's, to sea-launched munitions, to jets. Iran knows as well as anyone that should the US/Israel choose to demolish their nuclear plants, it would not be that hard.
The notion of a shot across the bow makes no sense here because it is usually done for the purpose of demonstrating the seriousness of the group who fired. The US has made it clear that they aren't foolin'. Why inflame the situation (and cause the Iranians to fortify their defenses prior to an attack) with a Warning Shot?
Originally posted by shots
You seem to be so busy trying to make this into some it is not. Here is the latest.
A powerful explosion in southern Iran which raised jitters of a possible attack on the country's nuclear installations, was a result of road blasting, a senior security official said.
"It was an explosion set deliberately to blast through rock and open a road," Supreme National Security Council spokesman Agha Mohammadi told AFP. "In no circumstances was it an attack against the Islamic republic's nuclear installations."
Source
Now put that in your pipes and smoke it before you have that heart attack making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Originally posted by shots
You seem to be so busy trying to make this into some it is not. Here is the latest.
A powerful explosion in southern Iran which raised jitters of a possible attack on the country's nuclear installations, was a result of road blasting, a senior security official said.
"It was an explosion set deliberately to blast through rock and open a road," Supreme National Security Council spokesman Agha Mohammadi told AFP. "In no circumstances was it an attack against the Islamic republic's nuclear installations."
Source
Now put that in your pipes and smoke it before you have that heart attack making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Building a road. They set off an explosion to build a road. What did they need to blow up on a flat coastal plane that would stop them from building a road? look at the topo maps of the area. It's a low flat plane, almost sea level. You don't blow up flat land to make way for a road.
Building a road. They set off an explosion to build a road. What did they need to blow up on a flat coastal plane that would stop them from building a road? look at the topo maps of the area. It's a low flat plane, almost sea level. You don't blow up flat land to make way for a road.