It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.smithsonianmag.com...
originally posted by: ttobban
a reply to: Byrd
Sorry, the H blocks were put as a reference to cutting technology, and weren't related to the alignments. I'm quite good at running points together that aren't always on the OP topic.
Even as America was set up for modern day, there was clearly specific alignments set along ley lines. Ley line construction in the days of exploration is quite simple, I can agree to that.
But, we were taught these ancient civilizations didn't know each other.
I just find it to be a lesser random event that these cultures so unattached were making the same kind of structures with the gaps between the rocks fit together being measured in microns.
I highly doubt that a stick or marker that expands the oceans to keep all those significant temples is something that's so easily achieved without GPS of some sorts.
What sticks were used to factor Easter island into a straight hemisphere from Giza? Did they even have compasses then? I get it... hire Mason & Dixon to measure a few sticks together... pretty simple. But, when's the last time you seen surveyors using sticks to go straight across oceans?
originally posted by: ttobban
a reply to: Byrd
Oh, I meant to post that H block piece in this thread. What I meant is that I may not be so easily understood, and that the H block addition was in reference to cutting technologies of such precise measure being done across cultures that supposedly didn't know each other.
How many things of similarity among these cultures do we have to relate before the lay line structure is recognized.
The way I see it, the fact the cuts as so precise in universal fashion, that they all built pyramids universally, they all had equinox interface technology universally is what made modern man even look to the possibility of ley lines... the mere fact that they line up is just an added bonus to links and similarities.
Agreeing on where to find ley lines gets halted at debate... when one side argues they don't exist, and the other side researches them further. Again, we are debating the space of limits here... where the points lining up aren't even being recognized as credible. How is anyone going to draw lines to someone that is not learning that they do in fact line up? If them lining up by design is not possible in ones mind, how can another create the connections they may see?
I can agree on your thoughts on land measurement, but accuracy's should sway some once the oceans get traveled upon... of which the Earth is 70%.
Their guess work was done with sea legs that means, and there's nothing to verify accuracy until GPS came into the picture. Water is the breakdown of the stick measuring hypothesis I feel.
originally posted by: Byrd
What sticks were used to factor Easter island into a straight hemisphere from Giza? Did they even have compasses then? I get it... hire Mason & Dixon to measure a few sticks together... pretty simple. But, when's the last time you seen surveyors using sticks to go straight across oceans?
Easter Island is at -27.129081, -109.364261. Giza is at 30.003937, 31.179878. There's no match there in latitude or longitude. As to "straight hemisphere", you can connect any two points on a sphere with a "great circle." That's just a property of globes.
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
a reply to: ttobban
I wish I could love your comment. I was about to reply with the same thing, ley lines.
I have quite a few books on the Earth's grid lines and ancient sites and it is amazing! How did they know this back then? Man was definitely smarter than we give them credit for, or smarter than they want us to give them credit for.
It's all about frequency, energy and vibrations. It balances the planet and right now we are off balance.
originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: CaptainBeno
Interesting I made a topic about this in 2016.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It it interesting. I only saw disinformation users jump on my post however.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: CaptainBeno
this APPEARS to be :
draw a VERY broad line around the globe - starting at one ancient site and ending at a second - then cherry pick all the other ancient sites that the line crosses
and simply ignore all sites that lay outside the " line "
what is the criteria ????
originally posted by: GBP/JPY
yes, did someone already post....on utube there's some home boy pointing out if one starts at the big pyramid as the mean time line....instead of London's Grenwich village line....common math functions locate em all....to the thousandth.....longitude and lattitude around the globe