Why the Dossier may be the most serious political scandal the US has ever seen.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: redtic

Well your own source directly explains how she obstructed justice.

The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena. The campaign now says it only learned when the emails were deleted from the FBI report.

www.factcheck.org...

Congress subpoenaed evidence, Hillary then destroyed thaat evidence and lied about it.

That is admitted obstruction of justice, clear as day.

Does this help you?

Not really. It further says:

But the PRN employee mistakenly did not make the retention-policy change and did not delete the old emails until sometime between March 25 and March 31, even though Mills had sent PRN an email on March 9 that mentioned the committee’s request to preserve emails.

...

Looking back now, Merrill’s July 2015 statement did not say that the emails were deleted before the subpoena was issued; Merrill said “her decision to not to retain her personal emails” was made before the subpoena was issued. That is accurate. The decision was made, but not executed.

That's called a misunderstanding or miscommunication that really had nothing to do with HC - not obstruction of justice.

a reply to: redtic

Hillary herself admitted that her lawyers, at her discretion deleted emails that were 'not work related' from her server.
Comey testified that work related emails were recovered from the server after being deleted.

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.

This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.

FBI.gov

"Several thousand".
That's not an oops.

a reply to: redtic

So its ok to destroy evidence after a subpoena is issued because you planned on destroying them before the subpoena?

Wow, have I got a bridge to sell you.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: redtic

So its ok to destroy evidence after a subpoena is issued because you planned on destroying them before the subpoena?

Wow, have I got a bridge to sell you.

It doesn't matter anyway.
It was an illegal act because the emails were official govt correspondence. You can't just destroy them.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: redtic

Hillary herself admitted that her lawyers, at her discretion deleted emails that were 'not work related' from her server.
Comey testified that work related emails were recovered from the server after being deleted.

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.

This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.

FBI.gov

"Several thousand".
That's not an oops.

Fair enough - that's something I didn't know. Like I said, I'm no HC fanboy - if there's a there there, then they should have at it. Still don't think it's of equivalent import, but I guess that doesn't matter.

a reply to: redtic

And in the Podesta emails its revealed that her lawyer, and the State Dept., both had a flashdrive with the emails intact.

So why LIE, sneak and slither about the whole thing if not GUILTY?

You tell me.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: redtic

So its ok to destroy evidence after a subpoena is issued because you planned on destroying them before the subpoena?

Wow, have I got a bridge to sell you.

FBI interviewed herthey believed her. So ill call it dead horse!!

a reply to: butcherguy

Comey leaking a FBI memo to create a SC is something that would be hard to categorize . That memo belongs to the public and was created on the tax payers dime . JW filed a FOIR for it but has only got the run around . You would think that if it was released then the tax payers should be allowed to see it . What are we to think about stuff like that when the head of the FBI does it ?

Fusion GPS has finally agreed to release its bank records...

The House Intelligence Committee said Saturday it has struck a deal to gain access to bank records from Fusion GPS, the firm behind the salacious anti-Trump dossier.

More at: www.foxnews.com...

These records are expected to show WHAT?

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: redtic

So its ok to destroy evidence after a subpoena is issued because you planned on destroying them before the subpoena?

Wow, have I got a bridge to sell you.

FBI interviewed herthey believed her. So ill call it dead horse!!

If evidence surfaces during the investigation that a LIE was told, the horse is resurrected.

a reply to: kelbtalfenek

The American people didn't need much of a push to become this divisive. Republicans and Democrats have been at each others throats increasingly over the years. Still, I never thought it would ever get this bad.

originally posted by: jaymp
a reply to: kelbtalfenek

The American people didn't need much of a push to become this divisive. Republicans and Democrats have been at each others throats increasingly over the years. Still, I never thought it would ever get this bad.

Im just kind of laughing how right and left keep switching talking points. They dont even invent new ones any more. Bill Cinton democrats its no big deal. Republicans hes molesting women. Then trump republicans its no big deal. Democrats hes molesting women. Or Trump jr meets with foreign agent to get dirt on Hillary. Republicans every candidate does opp research. Democrats he was colluding with a foreign agent. Hillary campaign pays for information from a foreign agent. Democrats every candidate does opposition research.Republicans Shes colluding with a foreign agent. Can even compare dossier and clinton emails but you get the idea.

Sadly we couldnt make this stuff up im just waiting for people to realize they are making the same arguments.

originally posted by: carewemust
Fusion GPS has finally agreed to release its bank records...

The House Intelligence Committee said Saturday it has struck a deal to gain access to bank records from Fusion GPS, the firm behind the salacious anti-Trump dossier.

More at: www.foxnews.com...

These records are expected to show WHAT?

It's called a "fishing expedition." They are hoping to find something that was not declared on their income tax that they can use for leverage. (It is also retaliation for the Mueller committee making similar requests.)

a reply to: jaymp

Well for me, it is those two party's with the RINO's and Dem's working against the citizens.. They both steal money and abuse people then let the other one off when it is their turn to face the truth because they have garbage on each other.

a reply to: Justoneman

Bingo, the system in our government rewards outside intervention by powerful monied interests. Does it matter who gets in!? They are all corralled to the same decisions by outside influences. We not only have to drain the swamp, but bulldoze it and rebuild with positivity and collaboration between the parties and serve the interests of the American people and the world.

a reply to: DJW001

Mark my words. Mueller going after Manafort will rip that bandaid off Washington that barely covered over the ongoing misdeeds at all levels and will end in military tribunals that will include indictments all the way up to the Supreme Court members.

Grab you popcorn, 2017/2018 is when the fuse was lit.

Lets not forget the Clinton Campaign's MO:

The time Hillary campaign posted fake Craigslist ads depicting Trump as a sex crazed rapist trying to hire willing chicks to get sexually assaulted everyday.

MAY 2016:

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Mark my words. Mueller going after Manafort will rip that bandaid off Washington that barely covered over the ongoing misdeeds at all levels and will end in military tribunals that will include indictments all the way up to the Supreme Court members.

Grab you popcorn, 2017/2018 is when the fuse was lit.

Wow slow down there is no way a military tribunal can be used the constitution forbids it on citizens.As far as the government now would be a good time for term limits. There was never supposed tobe career politicians they were supposed to serve then return home.

a reply to: Grambler


The laws broken by Democrats surrounding this Dossier will dwarf anything that Mueller's witch-hunt comes up with. And unlike Mueller's fishing-expedition, it won't take thousands of man-hours, and tens of millions of dollars, to produce the first indictments either.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: carewemust
Fusion GPS has finally agreed to release its bank records...

The House Intelligence Committee said Saturday it has struck a deal to gain access to bank records from Fusion GPS, the firm behind the salacious anti-Trump dossier.

More at: www.foxnews.com...

These records are expected to show WHAT?

It's called a "fishing expedition." They are hoping to find something that was not declared on their income tax that they can use for leverage. (It is also retaliation for the Mueller committee making similar requests.)

That may be why Fusion GPS resisted calls from Congress to disclose its banking statements for over 7 months.

But now we have another fish in the frying pan. It's especially exciting to me, because its the anti-American terrorist operation, known as Cable "News" Network (CNN).

CNN’s reporting on the Trump-Russia dossier has left out at least one crucial fact: the close ties between the network and the opposition research firm at the center of the dossier controversy, Fusion GPS.

Much more at: dailycaller.com...