It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
Trump is being criminally investigated for financial crimes as we speak, and there are an amazing number of Russians hanging about his campaign while America was under cyberattacks by Russia, which due to the secrecy and overt lying about it, is gaining his campaign a shiny counter-intelligence investigation.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: AboveBoard
Where did you hear Trump was under criminal investigation for financial crimes?
My bad. The "financial crimes" part seems obvious (Trump has a history of money laundering already). I believe the other criminal part is "obstruction of justice."
So given who the prosecutors are on Mueller's Dream Team SOMEONE is being investigated for financial crimes - either Trump, folks in his campaign like Manafort, or all of the above.
Someone explain how Loretta Lynch's semantics are criminal and obstructive, compared to what Team Trump (and a wider net of Reps like Chafetz and Nunes) is being investigated for?
It's an obvious ploy to entertain the Rep base. And it's apparently working.
*massive eye roll* 🙄
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I don't get it guys, the investigation is already on going its being done by the fbi.
What do you all think a committee can do? Who is it going to investigate?
It's like congress voting for a pay decrease.
Draining the swamp needs to start with lobbyists and special interest groups being limited to congressional influence so these people on the committees aren't full of conflicts of interest themselves.
Also most politicians are corrupt. The few that aren't get railed by their parties. .
If the committee was full of people of high integrity I would be more willing to say this is something. However it appears to be propaganda to me.
The fbi has trained detectives. Congress has lobby paid special interest.
As bad as the fbi has gotten they are leaps and bounds morally above congress
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Uh huh.
I think the precious document from the precious committee is an effort to follow commands from Dear Leader who has been whining that the DOJ and Sessions hadn't done enough to persecute Hillary.
It's pretty obvious. But I wouldn't put it past the Reps to follow Trump down the Bannana Republic Pathway to Dictatorial Glory by attempting to criminalize their political opponents.
Y'all should be worried. But cause it's the ones you are rooting for, it's awesome.
Enjoy the Constitutional Conflagration.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Not even close. This HR only just passed a committee. It isn't a full law yet that has been voted on by the whole House.
The House of Republicans....which has already been aware of this measure and likely ready to pass it quickly....
So when nothing comes of this will you come to me and admit you jumped to conclusions? I'm guessing you'll just bitch instead.
Sure will. Guessing that means you'll also come to me and admit you were wrong when people begin to drop.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Uh huh.
I think the precious document from the precious committee is an effort to follow commands from Dear Leader who has been whining that the DOJ and Sessions hadn't done enough to persecute Hillary.
It's pretty obvious. But I wouldn't put it past the Reps to follow Trump down the Bannana Republic Pathway to Dictatorial Glory by attempting to criminalize their political opponents.
Y'all should be worried. But cause it's the ones you are rooting for, it's awesome.
Enjoy the Constitutional Conflagration.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Xtrozero
Have we heard from Mueller yet?
I would hold off on saying "there's nothing there" until after they've completed the investigations and actually say whether or not there is something there.
Mueller's silence should not be taken as confirmation of "nothing." It means we don't yet know what he has.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Not even close. This HR only just passed a committee. It isn't a full law yet that has been voted on by the whole House.
The House of Republicans....which has already been aware of this measure and likely ready to pass it quickly....
So when nothing comes of this will you come to me and admit you jumped to conclusions? I'm guessing you'll just bitch instead.
The Op is not jumping to conclusions - its a statement of fact on what transpired in committee.
I hardly think one line of "it appears the sewer is about to get plumbed' negates the cold hard facts presented in the OP for us all to read.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Not even close. This HR only just passed a committee. It isn't a full law yet that has been voted on by the whole House.
The House of Republicans....which has already been aware of this measure and likely ready to pass it quickly....
So when nothing comes of this will you come to me and admit you jumped to conclusions? I'm guessing you'll just bitch instead.
Sure will. Guessing that means you'll also come to me and admit you were wrong when people begin to drop.
Lol. Sure. Though I'll probably also be leaving the country because if that happened then it would be the end of justice being blind and it will instead just be a partisan tool of whoever is in charge.