It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The researchers, reporting online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, say that the cost of surgery and hormones is not significantly higher than the cost of treatment for depression, substance abuse and HIV/AIDS, all of which are highly prevalent in those who are transgender but are not in a position to medically transition to the opposite sex. In 2014, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services began paying for sex reassignment surgery and other transitional care, after a 33-year-ban on covering those costs was lifted.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Well let's be honest, the transition is a very expensive elective process. $100,000 is not an unheard of cost. And most insurance don't cover it.
But there are studies that say it is cost effective to do so.
www.jhsph.edu...
The researchers, reporting online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, say that the cost of surgery and hormones is not significantly higher than the cost of treatment for depression, substance abuse and HIV/AIDS, all of which are highly prevalent in those who are transgender but are not in a position to medically transition to the opposite sex. In 2014, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services began paying for sex reassignment surgery and other transitional care, after a 33-year-ban on covering those costs was lifted.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Abysha
And policies change, and so do treatments. To say we will follow the same guide lines we do now is laughable as we go forward.
I'm sure that housing people who are drug addicts is much better than letting them live on the streets (another social problem I have done more research into than I care to think about).
Just as the John Hopkins study points to a better way to treat people who happen to be born into the "wrong" body.
When wombs are grown with stem cells and can be implanted we will have to see, and I have no b=doubt that here in America it will be a patient funded venture.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: yuppa
A "working vagina" is not all the hardware required to carry a child.
Guys don't have the equipment to feed the kid or any of the bajillion other functions a woman's body handles..
It will literally be harder than curing cancer..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: yuppa
BWAHAHAHA
If we are just making up nonsense I can come up with way better stuff than that!!!
Why don't they just grow a man around the womb!!!
That would probably be far easier than to retro fit a male body...
It is like retro fitting a 350 V8 on a pair of roller skates..
originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
This is an abomination if it were true. We are not seahorses, we do not choose our gender. Todays society is insane tbh. If we even have a future and we dont destroy ourselves, people will look back at this with disgrace and gross feelings we didnt stop to help these men out that were cross dressing. Instead the society enabled these lost confused people and made it worse... ppffffft.... sick!
If a man wants to mutilate his body, # it, his body, but bringing a child into this world thats not genetically his and not naturally is just wrong.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
This is an abomination if it were true. We are not seahorses, we do not choose our gender. Todays society is insane tbh. If we even have a future and we dont destroy ourselves, people will look back at this with disgrace and gross feelings we didnt stop to help these men out that were cross dressing. Instead the society enabled these lost confused people and made it worse... ppffffft.... sick!
If a man wants to mutilate his body, # it, his body, but bringing a child into this world thats not genetically his and not naturally is just wrong.
We dont choose our SEX you mean. genders mental only.