Fertility Doc's back Wombs for men: operations on NHS (taxpayer) so transgenders can have babies

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I bet one could scroll down your post history and it's a who's who of fake stories and propaganda.

I would like for you to do that very thing.


Where have I cast a negative shadow on the trans community? I think if you think you are an innie but you are an outie get the operation. But as a society we need to know how we are to fund all these elective surgeries.

Seem like you are in the business of making this personal, it is not. Let's talk about funding not me.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Come on Alien, use your words.....

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Come on Alien, use your words.....

You don't know the Bat Boy?

originally posted by: Rapha
Arn't womens pelvic cavities larger than mens thus allowing them to give birth ?

Imagine a screaming man giving birth with a natural smaller pelvic cavity.

Ooooooo. The screams will be heard from miles away.

It would be a C-section. Somehow getting a function womb implanted sounds difficult enough. Creating a functional route for vaginal delivery would take more than just a few transplants, it would be a major engineering endeavor that would dwarf the achievements of the Great Pyramid, the Great Wall of China, and putting man on the moon.

There is a whole lot happening in childbirth that goes far beyond just having a womb.

On a side note, if any women want to give their partners nightmares for the rest of their lives, here's how to do it. Study midwifery and, while studying, ask your partner to help out by testing you on various subjects. Make sure they have to see all the pictures in the textbooks while they do it. Don't ask me how I know this

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Come on Alien, use your words.....

Batboy was a shining example of what The Sun publishes. It's Elvis is an alien this, bigfoot got me pregnant that, etc, etc.

In essence, the story you posted is backed by the high standards of the same people who claimed that picture Deaf Alien posted is real.

They are truly a fake news outlet. In every sense of the phrase.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

No, it seems to be a tabloid sensation. Are you saying this is a joke? I bet people in England won't be laughing.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Deaf Alien

No, it seems to be a tabloid sensation. Are you saying this is a joke? I bet people in England won;t be laughing.

Yep. It's a joke. Read Abysha's post.

a reply to: Abysha

Doctors Could Be 5 Years Away From Uterine Transplants for Men
www.cnsnews.com...

2015 story

a reply to: rickymouse

Tax payers are not paying for this..

It is right wing doom porn that is scientifically impossible..

a reply to: seasonal

Maybe Arnold will be the first candidate?

a reply to: seasonal

"According to yet another conservative conspiracy site without a single investigative reporter on the payroll claims.."


Lol..just lol

a reply to: seasonal

Thats cool. I could see the benefit of knowing how to do this.

I wouldnt put the kid at risk though if it can be avoided. I think a woman is the best choice for child birth if you are talking about whats best for the baby.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Abysha

Doctors Could Be 5 Years Away From Uterine Transplants for Men
www.cnsnews.com...

2015 story

Ask yourself why all of these conservative blogs you read are the ones who put the transgender spin on this research. This research is driven by cisgender women who have rare conditions.

I've read many blogs and forums by and for transwomen who discuss this possibility and the overwhelming consensus is that it isn't something any of them would expect to be covered for trans women nor should it be. Womb transplants are not medically necessary to treat gender dysphoria and there are other ways to have a child with your DNA.

Nobody is taking that spin seriously other than bat-boy tabloids and fear porn conservative blogs. They write those to make you bark at things and make click money. That's the only reason.

I dont understand why adopting isnt good enough. They still have the chance of their body rejectibg the womb, they will never have a child genetically related to them. Theres nothing precious beautiful or natural of a man pushing a baby out thats not genetically his. This is turning more into science creating abominations! Its sick and perverting nature.

a reply to: Abysha

Lots of assumptions in your reply. Just stick to the thread, not what I read or don't read.

You can be sure this procedure will come to pass.

I really have no opinion on trans folks having babies. As long as the baby is loved and cared for that is all that really matters.

As far as paying for it, we will see.

# no!

NHS should not be paying for # like this!

a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

It is good enough usually this is a fake story.. for ones who want a child that is biologically theirs they have other methods..

No one is talking about this.. there are no studies being done..this is propaganda from one Dr (if he even actually exists) meant as doom porn click bait for conservative conspiracy sites.

a reply to: crazyewok

They won't!

It doesn't even exist let alone has it gone thru the testing for public funds to be allocated..

This is actual fake news.. not just news people do t like and claim is fake.

a reply to: seasonal

Only in right wing world..

The procedure hasn't even been proposed or suggested or ever ever been done..

And is just doom porn your pretending like we are a step away from allocating public funds to .. for a fictional procedure that doesn't exist..


Never ever ever claim to deny ignorance.. this thread is ignorance's poster child.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Abysha

Lots of assumptions in your reply. Just stick to the thread, not what I read or don't read.

You can be sure this procedure will come to pass.

I really have no opinion on trans folks having babies. As long as the baby is loved and cared for that is all that really matters.

As far as paying for it, we will see.

I was sticking to the thread. If the story is being pushed as a "trannies might get wombs oh lordy" but it's really about research initiatives to help cisgender women someday overcome reproductive issues from birth defects... pointing that out is pretty on-topic, wouldn't you say?