BREAKING: U.S. O-U-T of Paris Climate Accord

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Being a corporation doesn't make one a Globalist.

world wide corporations

See that attribute...

There's a Difference between global and "Globalist ". Here, let Wikipedia help you understand en.m.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: Ares2493

Solar panels don't fix anything, it takes the burning of CO2 emitting fuels to make every single component of them, same with batteries and the rest of your dumb electric cars.

You lazy #s are just gonna have to get un-addicted to burning # and wear more layers.

Poor, weak, soft fat asses...

Someone is melting.

originally posted by: jtrenthacker
Felt the need to post this gen again.

Hope the 'Giant Nazi Iceberg of Death' sinks his yacht.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: IAMTAT

Actually he's renegotiating the deal.

He thinks he is. EU already said no.

a reply to: thesaneone

yeah, too many layers and it's getting warm outside...

Top 10 full-retard reactions.

The funniest part of the whole thing is that if people actually tried to really reduce their carbon footprint, it would reduce the profits of every single business in existence.

Seriously now...Who really stands to lose if real whole-hearted attempts were made to reduce carbon emissions?.

Hint : Not the little people.

Dimwits.

Sure, no corporations have globalist type agendas. It's all an illusion.

Raise your hand if you think the architects of all these climate scams haven't dipped their hands into the Green Fund or one of the other many "climate change" funds for their own personal enjoyment.

Neil deGrasse Tyson
✔ ‎@neiltyson

If I and my advisors had never learned what Science is or how & why it works, then I’d consider pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord too.

9:26 PM - 31 May 2017



56,860 56,860 Retweets

133,682 133,682 likes

originally posted by: Painterz
Congratulations America, you're now in a club that contains just Syria and Nicaragua, as being the only other two nations who don't think this is important.

And you've proven that America's word is literally not worth the paper it is written on, signed in international treaty.

Sad sad day.

And it's ceded leadership to the Chinese.

The only sad part is people gave you stars. There was no treaty.

originally posted by: queenofswords
Raise your hand if you think the architects of all these climate scams haven't dipped their hands into the Green Fund or one of the other many "climate change" funds for their own personal enjoyment.

a reply to: Sublimecraft

But then again, nobody on Ceres really cares what Trump wants. Out is out (by 2020), so there's that. Right next to Syria and Nicaragua.

EU Climate and Energy Commissioner Miguel Arias Canete said Thursday that the EU would not impose trade sanctions on the US if it withdrew.

"We are going to show them that implementing our targets is very positive for the economy, very positive for developing sophisticated technological advances and it is very positive for the welfare of the citizens."

Donald Trump withdraws US from Paris climate deal

Spoken like a true European.

Look up planetary respiration, greening and the cutting of green CO2 absorbing things for lumber etc.

We could burn things forever if we stop destroying the CO2 absorbing mechanisms while we create more CO2.

Humans are not so bright.

originally posted by: queenofswords
Raise your hand if you think the architects of all these climate scams haven't dipped their hands into the Green Fund or one of the other many "climate change" funds for their own personal enjoyment.

After today, they will be scrambling to empty the treasury !!

originally posted by: angeldoll

Neil deGrasse Tyson
✔ ‎@neiltyson

If I and my advisors had never learned what Science is or how & why it works, then I’d consider pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord too.

9:26 PM - 31 May 2017



56,860 56,860 Retweets

133,682 133,682 likes

bunch of "PhleBOTomists"

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: IAMTAT

Actually he's renegotiating the deal.

I'd like to see him try. This deal spanned three presidential administrations, and involved pretty much every nation on the planet. Do you really think Trump has enough time in office to renegotiate? Do you think our allies would even let him try, after they put themselves on the line? The rest of the world likes the deal, they're not going to throw it away and start all over for Trump. Especially when Trump won't even be in office (even if he gets 2 terms) to sign the damn thing by the time the negotiation has finished.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

But then again, nobody on Ceres really cares what Trump wants. Out is out (by 2020), so there's that. Right next to Syria and Nicaragua.

Let me know when Russia, Iran, Turkey etal actually ratify the agreement and become more than mere signatories.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
What a utter moron.

Honestly this is just awful, utter crap.

Climate change denial at this level is total insanity, science is not a opinion, we are heading towards a climate disaster and Trump has just put the nail in the coffin.

Don't worry about it. It's basically irrelevant.

First of all, it's not official for 4 years, so 2018 midterms could change this.
Second of all, a 2020 election could put us right back in it a month after we officially leave it.
Third, the US might pollute the most per capita, but in total pollution we aren't the leaders. As long as nations like China and India stay in it and give an honest effort, then we get what we really wanted out of a global deal regardless of how we act towards it domestically.
Fourth, with or without Paris, green technology is going to get more competitive in the US over the next 20 years, and that market share will help with CO2 emissions on it's own.

It's not great that he backed out of Paris, but we're still going to come out of it pretty well. It's more of a diplomatic cost in pissing off our allies, rather than a move that's going to impact results (assuming the rest of the world stays in it).

if 3 trillion dollars would reduce the temperature (in 100 years) by 2/10ths of a degree, then would 30 trillion dollars reduce the temp (in 100 years) by 2 degrees?