It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
I'll leave that there. Pretty clear from the person who defines the scope of the appointed special counsel.
They have made no such determination if prosecution is warranted. Of course not. They have to investigate it first. But if they find reason to, they can prosecute.
By the way using "SC/SP" is also spurious. There is no such thing as a special prosecutor.
Not any more. The title was changed.
The purpose and powers remain the same.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth
Everything you posted, is wrong.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Phoenix
Jan 23 Before Flynn lied to the FBI before he was reported to the DOJ before Yates warned the Whitehouse before Flynn lied to the Veep. Before Flynn was fired.
Sorry nope.
Flynn has NOT been cleared by the FBI.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth
No I don't, I don't have to do a thing. You're wrong.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
I'll leave that there. Pretty clear from the person who defines the scope of the appointed special counsel.
They have made no such determination if prosecution is warranted. Of course not. They have to investigate it first. But if they find reason to, they can prosecute.
By the way using "SC/SP" is also spurious. There is no such thing as a special prosecutor.
Not any more. The title was changed.
The purpose and powers remain the same.
The powers are actually slightly different, with more oversight by the DoJ, not on a day to day basis, but in terms of recommendations to indict. No move to prosecute can be initiated by a special counsel - it is run through the DoJ, who can overrule. Thus a special counsel is still part of the Executive Branch.
Whereas a special prosecutor, a defunct role, was appointed by a panel of 3 judges, a special counsel is appointed by the DoJ and is bound by the policies of the DoJ.
This is an investigation and that is all.
As special counsel, Mueller is "authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters," according to the Justice Department order Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
I'll leave that there. Pretty clear from the person who defines the scope of the appointed special counsel.
They have made no such determination if prosecution is warranted. Of course not. They have to investigate it first. But if they find reason to, they can prosecute.
By the way using "SC/SP" is also spurious. There is no such thing as a special prosecutor.
Not any more. The title was changed.
The purpose and powers remain the same.
The powers are actually slightly different, with more oversight by the DoJ, not on a day to day basis, but in terms of recommendations to indict. No move to prosecute can be initiated by a special counsel - it is run through the DoJ, who can overrule. Thus a special counsel is still part of the Executive Branch.
Whereas a special prosecutor, a defunct role, was appointed by a panel of 3 judges, a special counsel is appointed by the DoJ and is bound by the policies of the DoJ.
This is an investigation and that is all.
As special counsel, Mueller is "authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters," according to the Justice Department order Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed.
www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: Indigo5
Annnnn it's "special counsel" NOT prosecutor as alleged.
That's very different than implied. Good try though.
It's actually the same position and I believe the titles were changed a while back. Special counsel still has the same investigative and prosecutor powers.
Also not correct.
A special counsel makes recommendations on prosecutions to the DoJ, who can over rule.
There is not even a suggestion of the prosecutorial process.
Nice try though.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth
No I don't, I don't have to do a thing. You're wrong.
Well sure, you don't HAVE to justify your lies.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: stosh64
???
He was asked if the DOJ or Attorney General told him to stop an investigation???
What does that have to do with the President saying he'd like Comey to let Flynn go?
The President is not the AG or DOJ and the President did not order the investigation stopped.
What a weird conflation of reality you seem to be attempting.