It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A female reporter attends prayer meetings at an important British mosque which claims to be dedicated to moderation and dialogue with other faiths. She secretly films shocking sermons given to the women-only congregation in which female preachers recite extremist and intolerant beliefs. As hundreds of women and some children come to pray, a preacher calls for adulterers, homosexuals, women who act like men and Muslim converts to other faiths to be killed, saying: "Kill him, kill him. You have to kill him, you understand. This is Islam."
How many pages do I have to go through to see if anybody has mentioned that this is a non-binding motion?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Milehigh
A female reporter attends prayer meetings at an important British mosque which claims to be dedicated to moderation and dialogue with other faiths. She secretly films shocking sermons given to the women-only congregation in which female preachers recite extremist and intolerant beliefs. As hundreds of women and some children come to pray, a preacher calls for adulterers, homosexuals, women who act like men and Muslim converts to other faiths to be killed, saying: "Kill him, kill him. You have to kill him, you understand. This is Islam."
originally posted by: Mictain
They are not trying to stop critics of Islam but stop Islamophobes from spreading hate.
Big difference. It is not that hard to understand.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
So its your equivalent of a nonbinding resolution?
LOL....your elected officials do naval gazing, too?
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
So its your equivalent of a nonbinding resolution?
LOL....your elected officials do naval gazing, too?
It's sending a message in an era where messages are important.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
How many pages do I have to go through to see if anybody has mentioned that this is a non-binding motion?
Of course "thought crime" starts off as some benign "motion" by a non elected committee in this case. If there are already blasphemy laws already in place why the need for extra "motions"
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: yuppa
Censorship is a property of totalitarianism. It's interesting to note that Germany had progressive hate speech laws prior to Hitler's rise to power, and the Nazis and their publications were forbidden. Hate speech legislation simply does not work, especially in the one instance where it was justified. This only gave them a platform of persecution, leading to their rising to power.
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Its not even a law lol, but dont let stop you guys from posting lies.
Oh and by the way, the jewish orthodox have there own court just like sharia law, im guessing thats ok because there not muslim.
Then Obama got elected, and now liberals worship Obama and Hillary for blowing up the Middle East, while then telling everyone else that we have to accept their mass exodus into the Western World, and we have to give them Sharia Law because that's their "culture".