Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

What rights are being asked for or demanded with these marches? None. It's about keeping the rights we have, that previous generations already fought for.

originally posted by: Kali74
It's about keeping the rights we have, that previous generations already fought for.

I fully support your right to make me a sammie.

Please don't hurt me.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

No one will get mad at you for facts, just your willingness to support violent Marxist revolutionaries in the US.

considering that the op seems to be wanting to cast that stereotype on the thousands of women who marched.... quite peaceably.. in washington and have plans to do so again....
what can I say.... the same thing was said about kaine because he spent some time doing missionary work in latin american...
your "violent marxist" deserves the same as every other person in america... innocent till found guilty in a court of law!!!

what would be revolutionary, and probably very effective would be if every one of those women who are marching would go home and saying no to all sexual advances till the loons in washington back off from planned parenthood!

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Take it up with the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Someone stated she was going to be deported (and probably will be) and I replied her citizenship hadn't been determined yet, to which you posted her conviction. That conviction has been vacated (tossed out). She is getting a new trial. Don't get mad at me for facts.

No one will get mad at you for facts, just your willingness to support violent Marxist revolutionaries in the US. How long have I been warning about Marxism on ATS?

Some of you sure want to paint me that way. You project onto me the same way you project these women as having anything to do with organizing vs commenting on the next women's action.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I recommend holding any hots...

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Take it up with the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Someone stated she was going to be deported (and probably will be) and I replied her citizenship hadn't been determined yet, to which you posted her conviction. That conviction has been vacated (tossed out). She is getting a new trial. Don't get mad at me for facts.

No one will get mad at you for facts, just your willingness to support violent Marxist revolutionaries in the US. How long have I been warning about Marxism on ATS?

Some of you sure want to paint me that way. You project onto me the same way you project these women as having anything to do with organizing vs commenting on the next women's action.

it's a thin veneer Kali.

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


Some folks that often rant about the sorted violence of the "right" need to read this. Left violence has always been far and away the bigger deal.

Maybe that's because the right talks a big game but their guns are smaller than their ammo if you know what I mean... Guess it will be the liberals saving our bacon if war ever comes to our shores.

a reply to: dawnstar

Marxism is revolutionary. They just used stealth cultural Marxism to break us down and now they are going to go for the jugular.

I feel like (for certain you-know-whos) this is well overdue for ATSer's.

How Do I Get Out of an Argument with an Irrational Person?

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

No one will get mad at you for facts, just your willingness to support violent Marxist revolutionaries in the US.

considering that the op seems to be wanting to cast that stereotype on the thousands of women who marched.... quite peaceably.. in washington and have plans to do so again....
what can I say.... the same thing was said about kaine because he spent some time doing missionary work in latin american...
your "violent marxist" deserves the same as every other person in america... innocent till found guilty in a court of law!!!

what would be revolutionary, and probably very effective would be if every one of those women who are marching would go home and saying no to all sexual advances till the loons in washington back off from planned parenthood!

Really? Did this Palestinian woman bomb stuff to stop sexual advances? I don't think so.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Actually I was using them as an example. When militant White Nationalists hold rallies or march they don't engage in violence. They are aggressively demonstrating their belief that America is for white people.

Problem with that is that middle eastern,hispanic,European is considered to be 'white'.

Catch all word for XENOPHOBES.

a reply to: Kali74

Why? Who's going to take them away? Is equal pay being taken away? Maternity leave? What rights do you believe are being removed from women in this enlightened 21st Century? I've certainly heard of no rights being removed from women but as this is happening in America I suppose I could have missed something vital I admit

a reply to: Gryphon66

Ayers just figured out he could get more accomplished by brainwashing college students with cultural Marxism.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Apparently there is a new ongoing trial for her lying on her immigration documents (it begun January 10th 2017)

I'm not understanding why the 6th Circuit vacated her conviction in this matter...

On February 25, 2016 the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit unanimously vacated her conviction of an immigration violation, sending the case back to Judge Drain to reconsider the admissibility of expert testimony.[19] Circuit Judge John M. Rogers, joined partially by Judge Karen Nelson Moore, vacated and remanded, while Judge Alice M. Batchelder partially dissented, wanting to vacate while ordering a new trial.[44] On December 6, 2016, Judge Drain in Detroit denied prosecutors’ request to reinstate Odeh’s conviction, instead granting Odeh a new trial, scheduled to begin January 10, 2017.[45][46]

(Wikipedia)

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Really? Did this Palestinian woman bomb stuff to stop sexual advances? I don't think so

considering some of the reports on how isreal treats the palestinians, one can only guess at the motivations...

question for you...
if sometime in the future, the UN decided that a portion of this country should be handed over to our country's debtors because we can't pay our debts, and all of the american in this portion should be relocated... how peaceful do you think the americans would be? would they just give up their homes without a fight to the chinese in repayment for the debt? the palestinians lost their lands, their homes, and still are, on far less merit ( a biblical myth written ages ago).

how does isreal handle any palestinian protests that might come about? how often do they listen to the palestinians complaints? do the palestinians have a voice in their gov't? maybe I am wrong but I kind of think that it wouldn't matter how peaceful the palestinians protects they would still be met with tear gas, water cannons and rubber bullets.. much the same way as the darpa protester were and they really quite peaceful in their protest. I also don't think that they are listened to very much or have much representation in the isreali gov't. and I kind of think that this might be why their protests lead to deadly violence much more often than ours do.

so, here the op is, trying to tie the violence of one palestinians past in with the thousands of very peaceful women who just want to be heard in this country, to be assured that their voice, their contribution to this country, their needs, their lives aren't minimalized.. and while the right are making claims that they are paid protestors, they are willing to risk their paying jobs to make their voices heard... while they are being told by the trumpetts that they should be willing to accept the sexual harassment that they proclaim is prevalent the workplace or just leave that workplace, they are walking out of that workplace, for just one day to say that no, they will not be accepting it!
my advice is to start listening to them... american women don't make bombs or blow up buildings, but they can make life really miserable just the same..

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Gryphon66

Ayers just figured out he could get more accomplished by brainwashing college students with cultural Marxism.

I'm aware that "cultural Marxism" is your bete noire.

If he was teaching Marxism, there's nothing wrong with that. Marxism is a collection of ideas and theories, nothing more, many of which were espoused by some of our Founders (like Thomas Paine, for example.)

Marxism is nothing more than a bug-a-boo for certain political agendas ... and is usually grossly misused.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Actually I was using them as an example. When militant White Nationalists hold rallies or march they don't engage in violence. They are aggressively demonstrating their belief that America is for white people.

Problem with that is that middle eastern,hispanic,European is considered to be 'white'.

Catch all word for XENOPHOBES.

And North African.

What the heck as age of these women got anything to do about it. Age does not diminish ideas, ideals or political leanings if they don't want to. And as for"oh these crimes they committed were 40 years ago" I'll just remind you of the Nazi concentration guards who are even now being fetched pout of the woodwork for their crimes. They committed them 70 years ago and since then have led peaceful lives. Yet all you people defending this do not rant about how they are now peaceful and should be left alone.
As for age being a reason not to fear them well a 70 year old can still pull a trigger and kill you.
All this is reasoning and not what I would claim is, was or going to happen.
Just a thought, Stalin was 74 when he died and he was as much a communist then as when he was young.

The folks on the list who have "priors" have all paid whatever legal price was demanded of them with no repeats of the crimes.

The point is that the claim is made in the OP that a) the newspaper article these women put their name to is a call to violence and b) that the women's marches in 2017 have been violent.

That claim is untrue. That is all.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Gryphon66

Ayers just figured out he could get more accomplished by brainwashing college students with cultural Marxism.

I'm aware that "cultural Marxism" is your bete noire.

If he was teaching Marxism, there's nothing wrong with that. Marxism is a collection of ideas and theories, nothing more, many of which were espoused by some of our Founders (like Thomas Paine, for example.)

Marxism is nothing more than a bug-a-boo for certain political agendas ... and is usually grossly misused.

. Once again I've proven I'm just a bit ahead of the curve. Marxist ideology wasn't even around during the Ff time and it is a completely separate ideology. Marxism socialism communism fascism are all part of leftist ideology. All promote the supreme State over individuality. Our FF believed in individuality and freedom.