It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

page: 15
56
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 01:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: diggindirt

None yet. I think that's the idea of all these women's demonstrations... to keep it that way.


Exactly. Just like none of the screeching about Obama collecting up the guns came true. But boy, oh boy, did a lot of money get raised to prevent it, eh? And a lot of money spent with US gun dealers.... I think there was even a march on DC---ahhhh, that must have been what stopped the evil plan.

But I don't think any of the guys leading that march were convicted felons...convicted for conspiring to murder innocent people for a political cause.

If you just have to protest and march and make noise, in the name of all that's sacred, protest these endless wars. But no, that's an issue that might unite people because it is a REAL issue---not something that might happen.




posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

The Globalists, Communists, and Terrorist all have something in common. They all want to take over the world. That is why they are aligned. Globalists obviously want a World Government. Communists want International Socialism by turning all countries into fail socialists because they can't compete against capitalists. The Terrorists wants a global caliphate. Three loser groups working together. Who would have thought.


This is what I also believe is happening and their hidden agenda.

These women ( if I can call them that, as seen in the video ) are being used as nothing but a tool.

Narrated and put together by a decent balanced intelligent woman.,
The Women's March, the DC Riots: Hatred, Violence, Islam and the Left ( duration 19:06 )


I`ve yet to see or hear a decent woman among them or someone with half a decent cause, they are either ill informed, bat poo crazy, full of hate and hypocrisy or have no clue why they are even doing it, other than other women are.



edit on 28-2-2017 by gps777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 06:07 AM
link   
a reply to: gps777

I wonder just how many of those women who will strike on that day believed trump's words when he described his pussy grabbing habits? that right there would be reason for me to walk!!! "I don't even ask them, ha, ha"... "Just let me do it".. he, he!!! and then.... "Well, it's normal locker room talk, we hear it every day..." and "If women don't want to be exposed to such in the workplace, they should just find a job as a teacher!!"""

it so nice to know that around half of this population think so little about women, their right to their own body's integrity that they would rally behind trump when this came out, support him, defend him... and then... even after this, THERE WERE CHURCH LEADERS CLAIMING THAT GOD HAD CHOSEN THIS GUY TO LEAD THE COUNTRY!!

you chose to caste the whole of these women's marches under a cloud of a few women...who jumped on board after the event was announced apparently since in the article they say they are "joining" the other groups involved...
are all alt right pc haters child molesters? are you all so insensitive that you'd leave a disabled dem stranded on a highway after accepting a job to tow her car simply because of a bumper sticker and then claim, religion as a defense?



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: gps777

originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

The Globalists, Communists, and Terrorist all have something in common. They all want to take over the world. That is why they are aligned. Globalists obviously want a World Government. Communists want International Socialism by turning all countries into fail socialists because they can't compete against capitalists. The Terrorists wants a global caliphate. Three loser groups working together. Who would have thought.


This is what I also believe is happening and their hidden agenda.

These women ( if I can call them that, as seen in the video ) are being used as nothing but a tool.

Narrated and put together by a decent balanced intelligent woman.,
The Women's March, the DC Riots: Hatred, Violence, Islam and the Left ( duration 19:06 )


I`ve yet to see or hear a decent woman among them or someone with half a decent cause, they are either ill informed, bat poo crazy, full of hate and hypocrisy or have no clue why they are even doing it, other than other women are.





good vid thanks for posting
edit on 28-2-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: diggindirt

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: diggindirt

None yet. I think that's the idea of all these women's demonstrations... to keep it that way.


Exactly. Just like none of the screeching about Obama collecting up the guns came true. But boy, oh boy, did a lot of money get raised to prevent it, eh? And a lot of money spent with US gun dealers.... I think there was even a march on DC---ahhhh, that must have been what stopped the evil plan.

But I don't think any of the guys leading that march were convicted felons...convicted for conspiring to murder innocent people for a political cause.

If you just have to protest and march and make noise, in the name of all that's sacred, protest these endless wars. But no, that's an issue that might unite people because it is a REAL issue---not something that might happen.
Not that they didn't try. First they used the red flag shootings with fake actors to scare people into believing gun control was necessary(Psyop against the people), then they tried the gun but back with people piling up their guns for money, then the other thing was the UN Small
Arms Treaty pushed and also the Democrats were pushing gun legislation but even Congress didn't go for it. Ya they wanted to get rid of he Second Amendment if they could.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: gps777

I wonder just how many of those women who will strike on that day believed trump's words when he described his pussy grabbing habits? that right there would be reason for me to walk!!! "I don't even ask them, ha, ha"... "Just let me do it".. he, he!!! and then.... "Well, it's normal locker room talk, we hear it every day..." and "If women don't want to be exposed to such in the workplace, they should just find a job as a teacher!!"""

it so nice to know that around half of this population think so little about women, their right to their own body's integrity that they would rally behind trump when this came out, support him, defend him... and then... even after this, THERE WERE CHURCH LEADERS CLAIMING THAT GOD HAD CHOSEN THIS GUY TO LEAD THE COUNTRY!!

you chose to caste the whole of these women's marches under a cloud of a few women...who jumped on board after the event was announced apparently since in the article they say they are "joining" the other groups involved...
are all alt right pc haters child molesters? are you all so insensitive that you'd leave a disabled dem stranded on a highway after accepting a job to tow her car simply because of a bumper sticker and then claim, religion as a defense?




Good, now they can buy their own birth control and abortions.

Hey, they gonna let the pro-life gals march this time or are they still banned?






posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:16 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Why would anyone ever think that words like that were sexist?

I mean, really.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:24 AM
link   
a reply to: gps777

Are you suggesting that video is in any way a fair or non-biased report on facts? LOL.

Was it the dynamic cinematic style soundtrack that tipped you off?

LOL, amazing.

I'm still waiting for all the violence that happened at the Women's March.

Not at inauguration protests, protests at Berkely, BLM protests ... we're discussing the Women's March in this thread.

Where's the violence?



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:32 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

just remember,
the best birth control happens to be free, and 100% effective....
and there's just as many men who wouldn't like it if women chose that birth control as there is men.
heck why do you think marital rape was considered legal for so long?

women should just say no to sex, unless they want kids...
having many kids too close together shortens a women's life expectancy and the hormones in the birth control becomes more dangerous as a women ages. much better just to have a sexless marriage unless you are hoping to have a child in the near future.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 09:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: burgerbuddy

just remember,
the best birth control happens to be free, and 100% effective....
and there's just as many men who wouldn't like it if women chose that birth control as there is men.
heck why do you think marital rape was considered legal for so long?

women should just say no to sex, unless they want kids...
having many kids too close together shortens a women's life expectancy and the hormones in the birth control becomes more dangerous as a women ages. much better just to have a sexless marriage unless you are hoping to have a child in the near future.



The communists co opted the feminist movement and under people like the communist Betty Friedan to enlist women in their agenda. It's not surprising that Marxist revolutionary types are still doing it. Margaret Sanger the founder of Planned Patenthood was racist and so is Hillary



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

lol... back in sanger's time, just about everyone had a hint of racism in them...
while margaret sanger was breaking the law in an attempt to just educate women about birth control--- her first clinic was set up in a jewish neighborhood by the way-- others were advocating and probably sterilizing women without their knowledge. go back a little further and look into just how europe treated their poor children in the workhouses. just how many children were starved or beaten to death in them.

I suppose you think that forcing some women, those who society thinks it's appropriate, to get sterilized and neglecting poor children is more humane than allowing women to chose for themselves and giving them to ability to control their own number of births?




1950 While in her 80s, Sanger underwrote the research necessary to create the first human birth control pill. She raised $150,000 for the project. 1960 The first oral contraceptive, Enovid, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as contraception.


I am over 50 years old, I had lots of friends that had six or seven siblings. To be honest, I really don't think that their parents really intended on having that many. and it was mainly in these overly large families that you would find the gov't surplus peanut butter and cheese.

can't help but wonder just how much our gov't budget would be messed up if there were as many large families now days.

if you see women wanting equal opportunity in the workplace, equal pay for equal work, decent reproductive healthcare, an equal voice in the gov't, and safety to walk down the street or work in the office without being sexually harassed or abused as "communistic" or "marxist" then it's you who has the problem.
why wasn't it communistic or marxist when the men in this country picked up arms against england and fought for their independence, why wasn't it when they rose up against the idea that the pope and preists and began printing the bible in their own language for their own homes so they could read the words themselves and find out how badly those priests and popes were lying to them?



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: burgerbuddy

just remember,
the best birth control happens to be free, and 100% effective....
and there's just as many men who wouldn't like it if women chose that birth control as there is men.
heck why do you think marital rape was considered legal for so long?

women should just say no to sex, unless they want kids...
having many kids too close together shortens a women's life expectancy and the hormones in the birth control becomes more dangerous as a women ages. much better just to have a sexless marriage unless you are hoping to have a child in the near future.



again,it's not the job of the State to provide abortions or contraceptives to all the women of the world. This is not just what Planned Parenthood tries to do
But the UN. It's been part of the global population control and is tied into Agenda 21
edit on 28-2-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   

edit on 28-2-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar
You said ..."I suppose you think that forcing some women, those who society thinks it's appropriate, to get sterilized and neglecting poor children is more humane than allowing women to chose for themselves and giving them to ability to control their own number of births? "
Nope you couldn't be more wrong dawn. I just said it's NOT the job of the State to do this ...to provide abortions. The American birth control league originally was funded by Rockefeller.why not let Ashley Judd and this terrorist woman fund abortions worldwide out of their own pockets and all the rest of Hollywood elites instead of expecting it to come out of taxpayer pocket, now tell me which super rich you want soaked.
edit on 28-2-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-2-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 11:06 AM
link   
One of the few legitimate functions of the national government, in my opinion, is to maintain the national infrastructure.

One of the most important and vital parts of our infrastructure is people ... the populace ... and therefore, maintaining public health is vital to the success and productiveness of our nation.

51-52% of our population is female. Females have different or additional health needs from males.

I personally have no issue with the national government acting to insure the general welfare though healthcare and public health.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
One of the few legitimate functions of the national government, in my opinion, is to maintain the national infrastructure.

One of the most important and vital parts of our infrastructure is people ... the populace ... and therefore, maintaining public health is vital to the success and productiveness of our nation.

51-52% of our population is female. Females have different or additional health needs from males.

I personally have no issue with the national government acting to insure the general welfare though healthcare and public health.



I don't think anyone would disagree with that. The waters get muddied somewhat when abortion is thrown in to the public health mix.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Hyde Amendment, 1977, etc. precludes Federal funds from being used for abortion.

I don't agree with that, but that is "the law" in the US.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
One of the few legitimate functions of the national government, in my opinion, is to maintain the national infrastructure.

One of the most important and vital parts of our infrastructure is people ... the populace ... and therefore, maintaining public health is vital to the success and productiveness of our nation.

51-52% of our population is female. Females have different or additional health needs from males.

I personally have no issue with the national government acting to insure the general welfare though healthcare and public health.

The Defense of our nation is the only thing our government legitimately is responsible for, and the regulation of commerce, which has been interpreted to mean that Congress has taken to believe includes the right to control health access which is a misinterpretation of the commerce clause.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

The Constitution disagrees with your assessment.

See Article I, Section 8 for starters.
edit on 28-2-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Federal dollars CAN NOT be used to pay for an abortion. Planned Parenthood cannot use any of its federal funding toward any abortion. Abortions performed at PP are based on the womans income thanks to private donations. So... Ashley Judd etc... probably have paid for abortions out of their own pocket.




top topics



 
56
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join