Trump bid to reinstate travel ban fails following late night appeals court ruling

a reply to: reldra

Maybe, I can see the future and i say YES. haha.

People in the future will see these threads and laugh, and learn and grow (and groan) lol.

They will say.... Wow people back then were retards, but there were a lot of smart people too with HUMOR.

That's what I see.

a reply to: reldra

Technically..yes!!!

The internets never forgets. GWB said so!

Just an alien outsider looking, don't mind me..

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Xcathdra
Much of that made no sense.

That is a typical reaction to reading something you have absolutely zero knowledge in.

The post made perfect sense, just because it is foreign language to you doesn't mean it actually makes no sense.

Typical.

I actually do have knowledge about it. Therefore, I noted the post made little sense. The post did not mainly apply to what they were attempting to argue.

You should not attempt to look at information in the brains of other people. You are not good at it.

Then elaborate why it made no sense.

we all will be waiting watching the GIF above this post.

a reply to: tikbalang

LOL everytime you post that avi i laugh! haha

On my planet, we let the workers select their own spokesperson..
It's funny to see when the workers demand more, I always said this;" People are very lazy "

a reply to: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

aww a Liberal... That's so lame.

originally posted by: LuXTeN
a reply to: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

aww a Liberal... That's so lame.

You have made several posts in this thread and none of them have contributed anything to what this thread is about.

Perhaps you should stick to the off topic section.

originally posted by: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

The irony in that cartoon must be lost on you I suspect.

a reply to: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

Please point out the parts you dislike that i''ve not contributed to. Please dont get snippy, i don't do snippy.

Thank you sweetie

a reply to: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

That does not apply to people outside the US. Secondly the EO does not establish a state religion. 3rd the constitution gives congress and the president authority over immigration and refugees.

The establishment clause has no bearing.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Xcathdra
Much of that made no sense.

That is a typical reaction to reading something you have absolutely zero knowledge in.

The post made perfect sense, just because it is foreign language to you doesn't mean it actually makes no sense.

Typical.

I actually do have knowledge about it. Therefore, I noted the post made little sense. The post did not mainly apply to what they were attempting to argue.

You should not attempt to look at information in the brains of other people. You are not good at it.

Yet you still have not explained why the legal / constitutional issues I raised dont apply in your opinion. If you dont mind me asking whats your background in where you have knowledge on the topic?

a reply to: reldra

It's funny when Obama was doing this you guys were saying Just to let him do his job, but now we need " procedure and examination" funny how all of that works, huh?

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Xcathdra
Much of that made no sense.

That is a typical reaction to reading something you have absolutely zero knowledge in.

The post made perfect sense, just because it is foreign language to you doesn't mean it actually makes no sense.

Typical.

I actually do have knowledge about it. Therefore, I noted the post made little sense. The post did not mainly apply to what they were attempting to argue.

You should not attempt to look at information in the brains of other people. You are not good at it.

Yet you still have not explained why the legal / constitutional issues I raised dont apply in your opinion. If you dont mind me asking whats your background in where you have knowledge on the topic?

That would be CNN.

originally posted by: LuXTeN
a reply to: MakeAmericaSaneAgain

Please point out the parts you dislike that i''ve not contributed to. Please dont get snippy, i don't do snippy.

Thank you sweetie

But you just did snippy when you said, with no contribution to the thread, 'aww, a liberal, that's so lame'.

That's not snippy?

a reply to: gortex

It's not Trump vs the Constitution

It's the constitution vs over reaching, out of line Judge

originally posted by: LuXTeN
a reply to: gortex

I'm not American but i can see what's going on.

I can see what the scum of the earth have done to our Democracy. And I am not happy about it. I find it dispicable and reprehensive. I am appauled that people have fallen so far that they won't even acknowlege or give their own President a chance to prove he's for them!

when Obama won, i wanted to cry, i knew from day one he would be a disaster, i have intuition and it almost NEVER fails me, particularily in this area.

People need to band together because if they don't, the division will be so fierce, it will tear the fabric of American Society apart.

I hope you wrong but doubt you are. I just hope everyone is ready.............because it isn't going to be pretty.

Fantastic.

While i don't disagree with Trumps EO, I applaud our nations system working the way its intended. Very nice to see the check bring balance, and makes me feel a bit better about Trump being POTUS.

a reply to: gortex

Not sure how much more evidence the administration could have other than what was already presented but it seems the Trump vs the Constitution case is set to rumble on for at least the next few days , I suspect the appeal will fail unless the administration redraft the EO with more care.

At this point it is not about keeping the country safe, it is about Trump getting his way. I'm not sure what the rest of the economy is going to do, but this is the dawn of a golden age for lawyers.