It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: gortex
I knew this would not be easy for Trump, thankfully. It is very difficult to overturn a TRO. The burden of proof is high and must prove that removing it causes a clear and immediate danger.
Calling a judge a 'so called' judge did not help him. They did remove the word 'outragous' from the description of the order minutes later, but the damage had already been done. It is dangerous and authoritarian for the executive branch to describe the judicial branch in that way.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
originally posted by: Nyiah
Good lord, the beloved American system is doing it's job here in making sure s# isn't in violation of the Constitution.
FFS, I never bitched ONCE about any of Obama's EOs going through the same. NOT ONCE. Because it's supposed to work like this to catch unconstitutional, BS EOs when they're brought to attention. Grow up and quit crying about it. Fekking snowflakes to beat all others, my god.
I have instructed Homeland Security to check people coming into our country VERY CAREFULLY. The courts are making the job very difficult!
Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril.If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!