BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

originally posted by: UKTruth
Here is a side by side view that explains The Washington Post perfectly. They are no more than a Democratic Party propaganda rag:

Condemn or commend - do it fairly. The first is an editorial, the second is an opinion. Just saying.

a reply to: surnamename57

The editors decided to run the opinion piece.

From the NY Times of all places

"FBI Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.
Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government."

You leftist can blame Russia till the cows come home but you all know the truth. Clinton is to blame for her own incompetence.

Hehehe... imagine if any of the democrats stocks or something like that in a Russian energy company.... oh wait.... doesn't Podesta have stock in Joule??

/irony

a reply to: UKTruth

I can't find words. I read the first few sentences of the article and had to close the page.

There is definitely a growing schism in how people process and perceive events. The actual action and source of the non-physical mind/mental forces interfacing with the limited physical brain and in what way (which parts of the brain are being activated to process information) has been/is being "reworked" in a percentage of the population. I've been thinking a lot about this. It is very serious and glaringly apparent in my view but it's off topic so I'll stop there.

a reply to: UKTruth

And Forbes editors will run editorials and opinion pieces that favor Republicans/conservatives, as will the Wall Street Journal. What's your point?

a reply to: kaylaluv

He doesn't have one, he just likes to blame anyone who says something bad about Trump as being paid by the Clintons.

a reply to: SudoNim

Except wikileaks proves the media is in cahoots with Hillary. Are you saying the "republican" media has been nice to Trump? Thats easily refuted. Bill Kristol, Karl Rove, WSJ, etc have all been against him. You could name maybe brietbart as being on Trumps team.

originally posted by: flice
Hehehe... imagine if any of the democrats stocks or something like that in a Russian energy company.... oh wait.... doesn't Podesta have stock in Joule??

/irony

And HRC handed RUSNANO a US operation on a platter....guess who is on the board of Joule....the President of RUSNANO.

originally posted by: UKTruth
I think we have a winner.

Apparently Comey is attacking women.

time.com...

Just a it for the new riots to begin...

#WomensLivesMatter

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UKTruth

And Forbes editors will run editorials and opinion pieces that favor Republicans/conservatives, as will the Wall Street Journal. What's your point?

You made it, again, for me. WaPo is a propaganda rag for the Democrats. There are of course GOP propaganda rags too.

Hillary's deflection strategy seems to be that there will be nuclear and civil war if she is not elected.
Perhaps she realised that blaming Trump for inciting a civil war wasn't working so she has decided to do it herself

She seems to forget that she is the war candidate.

New emails dump interesting 👍

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth
So the FBI reopens a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton and the defence is a combination of :

1) Comey broke the law.
2) Trump is working with Putin.
3) The Republicans are working with the KGB.
4) Comey is now partisan, when he wasn't before.
5) None of it is Hillary's fault and nothing is in the emails as they are all duplicates.

..and the 'right-wingers' are accused of being conspiracy theorists nut jobs.

It seems the inversion of reality continues unabated.

Really? They re-open an investigation that had already cleared Hillary and you've already convicted her. Talk about jumping the gun.

What defence is needed, nothing has come out yet, your talking rubbish as usual. The 5 points you've made are no defences, they are separate issues, how can you defend something that hasn't happened yet?

I actually haven't convicted her. The FBI have reopened the criminal investigation. We'll have to wait to see whether she goes to jail.
All the 'separate issues' mentioned have come up in response to questions about the FBI investigation, so yes, they are defences. Very bad ones aimed at deflecting, but defences nonetheless.

Except your not "waiting and seeing" you've already made up your mind.

This isn't 162 pages of people saying, "lets wait and see" its 162 pages of people saying she should now be jailed.

What are they defending? Stop talking BS.

99.9% chance there is emails that will finish Hillary 2016.... do the math.

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth
So the FBI reopens a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton and the defence is a combination of :

1) Comey broke the law.
2) Trump is working with Putin.
3) The Republicans are working with the KGB.
4) Comey is now partisan, when he wasn't before.
5) None of it is Hillary's fault and nothing is in the emails as they are all duplicates.

..and the 'right-wingers' are accused of being conspiracy theorists nut jobs.

It seems the inversion of reality continues unabated.

Really? They re-open an investigation that had already cleared Hillary and you've already convicted her. Talk about jumping the gun.

What defence is needed, nothing has come out yet, your talking rubbish as usual. The 5 points you've made are no defences, they are separate issues, how can you defend something that hasn't happened yet?

I actually haven't convicted her. The FBI have reopened the criminal investigation. We'll have to wait to see whether she goes to jail.
All the 'separate issues' mentioned have come up in response to questions about the FBI investigation, so yes, they are defences. Very bad ones aimed at deflecting, but defences nonetheless.

Except your not "waiting and seeing" you've already made up your mind.

This isn't 162 pages of people saying, "lets wait and see" its 162 pages of people saying she should now be jailed.

What are they defending? Stop talking BS.

99.9% chance there is emails that will finish Hillary 2016.... do the math.

That's not math, that's opinion.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta wrote: > On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have > to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later > On Mar 2, 2015 9:19 PM,

originally posted by: Denoli
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta wrote: > On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have > to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later > On Mar 2, 2015 9:19 PM,

Was that before or after the subpoena was issued.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth
So the FBI reopens a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton and the defence is a combination of :

1) Comey broke the law.
2) Trump is working with Putin.
3) The Republicans are working with the KGB.
4) Comey is now partisan, when he wasn't before.
5) None of it is Hillary's fault and nothing is in the emails as they are all duplicates.

..and the 'right-wingers' are accused of being conspiracy theorists nut jobs.

It seems the inversion of reality continues unabated.

Really? They re-open an investigation that had already cleared Hillary and you've already convicted her. Talk about jumping the gun.

What defence is needed, nothing has come out yet, your talking rubbish as usual. The 5 points you've made are no defences, they are separate issues, how can you defend something that hasn't happened yet?

I actually haven't convicted her. The FBI have reopened the criminal investigation. We'll have to wait to see whether she goes to jail.
All the 'separate issues' mentioned have come up in response to questions about the FBI investigation, so yes, they are defences. Very bad ones aimed at deflecting, but defences nonetheless.

Except your not "waiting and seeing" you've already made up your mind.

This isn't 162 pages of people saying, "lets wait and see" its 162 pages of people saying she should now be jailed.

What are they defending? Stop talking BS.

99.9% chance there is emails that will finish Hillary 2016.... do the math.

That's not math, that's opinion.

The opinion is that out of 650,000 emails, if just 65 contain either previously unseen work related or classified emails. Clinton through.

IF just 1% of 1% of those 650,000 emails are Hillary related and meet the criteria above, Clinton is finished..good times


Glad you are taking the stance that there is a 0.01% chance nothing involves Clinton.

March 4th, 2015.

Desperation in Hillary supporters is mounting...

There is fear in their voices.......

Their personal attacks against posters grows daily because that is all they have left.

Important people are starting to call for Hillary to step down.


It just gets better and better every single day.