It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Correct me if im wrong (Mandela Effect)....but the universe i come from had John Kerry and Al Gore lose to GW Bush, and neither of them accepted the result. I remember SCOTUS weighing in, and hanging chads.
oO
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
because its coming from the same man who has said from the beginning (as a safety net) "Its rigged"
He cant accept responsibility for anything he does.....he uses it as a copout.......he always has one, has since the very first day he ran......
Hes a classic example of NPD "Narcissistic personality disorder" everything is someone else fault......
Its really old and disgusting........
I loathe him and Hillary both......but tonight he did his same song and dance....
When asked a direct question "HILLARY DID THIS" and never answer.......ever.....
on Policy "HILLARY IS CROOKED!" never answer on what his policies were.....
On his direction and how hes going to do things "NOT LIKE HILLARY AND OBAMA" .....never give definitive answers....
hes a freaking clown..........an idiot.....someone without a plan and without a clue......who thinks he knows everything.....
He is clinical and a danger to this country........
Vote 3rd party........
MBTM out............
originally posted by: StolidPanda
It is interesting how him not conceding to Hillary if she wins is "horrifying". Why is it horrifying? Our country is already separated and has been a while. So thats not it.
Afraid he might find something? Maybe he'll end up a dead man because of this. Definitely staying tuned.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kosmicjack
I am a little confused as to why the uproar. I've not yet seen DT quoted directly. He said "I will keep you in suspense." "What I'm saying, I will tell you in time."
-that's it.
originally posted by: Grambler
Now Trump saying he would wait to see if he would accept the results of the election, thats a big deal to the press. I mean, when Gore didn't accept the results that wasn't a big deal, and mnny members of the media that are criticizing Trump still to this day say Bush stole the election, but that was Democrats doing that, and as we all know, Democrats are always right and everyone else always wrong.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kosmicjack
I am a little confused as to why the uproar. I've not yet seen DT quoted directly. He said "I will keep you in suspense." "What I'm saying, I will tell you in time."
-that's it.
Any answer but "I will accept the results of the election" is the wrong answer. If you can't see that then Democracy isn't important to you.
originally posted by: bknapple32
So yes, if Trump is in that situation, Id expect him to wait and see what is going on.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: carewemust
Oh hells bells, you're probably right. Why should any one freak out over a little thing like undermining the very foundation of our Democracy? No biggie, right?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Grambler
Now Trump saying he would wait to see if he would accept the results of the election, thats a big deal to the press. I mean, when Gore didn't accept the results that wasn't a big deal, and mnny members of the media that are criticizing Trump still to this day say Bush stole the election, but that was Democrats doing that, and as we all know, Democrats are always right and everyone else always wrong.
You guys really need to stop with this thin comparison. Gore questioned the results of ONE state election AFTER the votes were cast. Plus there was actual evidence of rigging to base the claims on.
HOWEVER when you are questioning the results of the election before the election even happened then you are on a COMPLETELY different level here.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: bknapple32
So yes, if Trump is in that situation, Id expect him to wait and see what is going on.
I think that is mostly what he was saying. I think the media have spun it into something much more wild than that. He was simply being honest (maybe for a change?) that he would leave options open based on what happens. Which seemed reasonable to me. I wouldn't rent a house sight unseen, afterall.
You are correct, and I misstated. Kerry did not push it to SCOTUS. He started to raise a stink, then backed off. To his credit 100%.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Grambler
Now Trump saying he would wait to see if he would accept the results of the election, thats a big deal to the press. I mean, when Gore didn't accept the results that wasn't a big deal, and mnny members of the media that are criticizing Trump still to this day say Bush stole the election, but that was Democrats doing that, and as we all know, Democrats are always right and everyone else always wrong.
You guys really need to stop with this thin comparison. Gore questioned the results of ONE state election AFTER the votes were cast. Plus there was actual evidence of rigging to base the claims on.
HOWEVER when you are questioning the results of the election before the election even happened then you are on a COMPLETELY different level here.
Secondly, you make it seems as if Gore only challenged one state and it wasn't a big deal. yet that state cost him the election, so yes he was challenging the results of the election.
Had gore been asked befor the election will you accept the reults of the election, I am sure he would have said yes. Then he would have been a liar, as he would have then said, but wait we found evidence of shadiness.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: bknapple32
I wasn't trying to decipher it. Its just what he said. "Ill tell you when we get there".
If i were him, win or lose I'd be launching lawsuits against the media. There are FCC regulations to how they can advertise for candidates. Its possible that several national outlets are responsible for committing libel at worst, and violating FCC regulations at best.
It could be possible that I would cheer for him in such a scenario. Media is a farce in this country. Been that way for quite awhile...this just may be the catalyst.
And don't get me wrong: i don't think Trump is a good guy, or would be a good president. Im just presenting what I see.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler
Which is sad, because he really doesn't seem like a nice man. Yet I feel compelled to defend him. Which, if i am being honest, just makes me hate media for putting me in that position.