It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burntheships
Here too, a citation would be good as a basis for the conversation.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: burntheships
Here too, a citation would be good as a basis for the conversation.
Easy enough -- how about you read his full report on the results of his Apollo-14 ESP experiment, and we can discuss whether he was justified in claiming success, or was just imagining things. It's a good place to start since the assumption of his good judgment on such topics is the underpinning of a lot of conclusions. Let's test it.
originally posted by: schuyler
Of course Mitchell did not set up an experiment that could match your high standards. He had an amateur interest in the subject and did what he could. He had no peer review, no academic oversight, not a lot of time to set it up, and no particular expertise in designing an experiment of this sort. To call his experiment "bogus" as a result is, I think, unfair. He has to deal not only with people like you, who will fault him on many minor points, but also with people who believe such a thing is impossible and dismiss it out of hand.
Mitchell's solution of pairing sequences seems to me to be as valid as any other. If you've seriously dealt with paranormal phenomena, you know that precise "timing" is often beside the point. It's force fitting a paranormal phenomenon into a normal one. Even physicist are unsure what "time" really is and suggest it isn't real at all, but a product of the human mind. besides, it's not as if Mitchell could go back and re-do his experiment. And if he claimed a correlation that you disavow, so what? Hasn't it been shown that half the stuff that appears in scientific journals is invalid anyway, despite "perfect" statistical method?
You're being way too picky. I suspect you could find fault with any experiment ever designed. He accomplished a hell of a lot during his life, and he has been mis-represented countless times by critics who really weren't listening to what he had to say. You don't really need to add fuel to this fire. No one is likely to think more highly of you because you have.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: burntheships
Here too, a citation would be good as a basis for the conversation.
Easy enough -- how about you read his full report on the results of his Apollo-14 ESP experiment, and we can discuss whether he was justified in claiming success, or was just imagining things. It's a good place to start since the assumption of his good judgment on such topics is the underpinning of a lot of conclusions. Let's test it.
One of Mr. Jonsson most famous extrasensory experiments occurred during NASA's Apollo 14 mission to the moon, when he collaborated with astronaut Edgar D. Mitchell. Mitchell arranged a set of ESP cards with different symbols on them from his space capsule, and Mr. Jonsson tried to picture the sequence of the cards from thousands of miles away. He named the cards in the correct order about half the time, a score far higher than pure chance would allow.
How did it come about that you decided to do ESP experiments while on your mission?
It happened about three weeks before the mission. I met some research physicists, Drs. Boyle and Maxie, who were very interested in the field, and suggested to me that this would be an ideal time to do the experiment. They gathered and coordinated everything; I was too busy for that. In addition to the two of them, there was a reputable psychic that they knew, and Olof Jonsson, who was a well-known public psychic in Chicago. We practiced a few times with the principles before the flight. As far as we know, it doesn't take any expertise at all, except relaxation and focus, and the ability of individuals to intuitively resonate with someone else.
On June 29, 2011, the federal government of the United States filed a lawsuit against Mitchell in the United States district court in Miami, Florida after discovering that he placed a camera used on Apollo 14 for auction at the auction house Bonhams. The litigation requested the camera be returned to NASA. Mitchell's position was that NASA had given him the camera as a gift upon the completion of the Apollo 14 mission. Bonhams withdrew the camera from auction.[11] In October 2011, attorneys representing the government and Mitchell reached a settlement agreement, and Mitchell agreed to return the camera to NASA, which in turn would donate it for display at the National Air and Space Museum.[12] On September 20, 2012, Congress enacted H.R. 4158, confirming full ownership rights of artifacts to astronauts on Apollo (and Mercury and Gemini) space missions.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: burntheships
Here too, a citation would be good as a basis for the conversation.
Easy enough -- how about you read his full report on the results of his Apollo-14 ESP experiment, and we can discuss whether he was justified in claiming success, or was just imagining things. It's a good place to start since the assumption of his good judgment on such topics is the underpinning of a lot of conclusions. Let's test it.
I don't know how long Mr Mitchell has to live but I hope his dementia prevents him from continuing his blabbing, soon I hope.
Right now, if aliens were to make themselves known, they would be killed. Just look how people treat each other when any of us dares to be different. An alien would be killed on sight.
Edgar Mitchell walked on the moon, but you claim he is brainwashed by Carol Rosin? Now that is a new one....
originally posted by: klassless
a reply to: AutOmatIc
I don't know how long Mr Mitchell has to live but I hope his dementia prevents him from continuing his blabbing, soon I hope.
In a way it's unfortunate you re-posted what schuyler said, because I've enjoyed reading many of schuyler's posts and think he has made many good points.
originally posted by: RUSSO
I want to make schuyler post my own words:
Much greater care was put into those failed claims in the history of psi research than was put into Mitchell's amateurish effort but at least that's one saving grace of schuyler's post, he admits it's an amateur effort and it should have stopped there but I don't know why he goes on to defend it.
Although our colleagues in other disciplines would probably agree with the oft-quoted dictum that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” we psychologists are more likely to be familiar with the methodological and statistical requirements for sustaining such claims and aware of previous claims that failed either to meet those requirements or to survive the test of successful replication. Several other reasons for our greater skepticism are discussed by Bem and Honorton (1994, pp. 4–5).
Exactly, so I don't see why some people get so excited about what Mitchell says when he doesn't claim to have seen anything himself. Other people told him stuff. I can't say I'm surprised by these e-mails.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
he never claimed to have met or seen anything himself. He just met people who claimed they had.
I have looked into Edgar Mitchel's claims which are the topic of this thread and OneBigMonkeyToo is right that Mitchell never claimed to have seen any aliens himself. Other people told him stuff. Other people told me stuff too, like your post saying there are aliens, but I see nothing to back up your alien claims nor did Mitchell ever provide anything to back up his claims.
originally posted by: billydebunker
Um, you are aware that aliens have been here for over seventy years, right? And that you can't kill them at all, right?
They are in complete control of every encounter, man, look into it and check back later.
When you become a national hero like Dr. Mitchell, then maybe someone will allow a little more credibility to your comment.. Yeah