It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Wow! 6 pages of the OP saying no more than
-GR is bunk
-GPS satellites don't use GR
-And him having a tantrum because he's been asked for proof of his claims.
I'm starting to wonder why this is still in the science forum.
originally posted by: ScrappyJ
It doesn't have a lot to do with the OP's original post but hey it's more entertaining that false assumptions and ludacris assertations. I would have just made a thread about this theory but I'm not allowed to yet as I have spent the entire time since joining in lock up. I am a very long time reader of the threads here just the same, oh and heres a link I just found that is kinda along similar lines of my theory of backwards time. Though I'm not sure if it will be a live link or what as I'm a total newb.
phys.org...
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Wow! 6 pages of the OP saying no more than
-GR is bunk
-GPS satellites don't use GR
-And him having a tantrum because he's been asked for proof of his claims.
I'm starting to wonder why this is still in the science forum.
Seems like a mod should move this to skunk works. Or hoaxes.
Or jokes.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Wow! 6 pages of the OP saying no more than
-GR is bunk
-GPS satellites don't use GR
-And him having a tantrum because he's been asked for proof of his claims.
I'm starting to wonder why this is still in the science forum.
Seems like a mod should move this to skunk works. Or hoaxes.
Or jokes.
Have you seen where it's been placed?
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Wow! 6 pages of the OP saying no more than
-GR is bunk
-GPS satellites don't use GR
-And him having a tantrum because he's been asked for proof of his claims.
I'm starting to wonder why this is still in the science forum.
Seems like a mod should move this to skunk works. Or hoaxes.
Or jokes.
Have you seen where it's been placed?
That's better. Now no proof is required and the OP can say whatever unsubstantiated stuff he likes. All hail skunk works.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
My word Einstein's a touchy subject ain't it.
Lol but he ain't around for either
originally posted by: peck420
originally posted by: Nochzwei
My word Einstein's a touchy subject ain't it.
Einstein himself, nope. From everything said about him, he would probably be the first to help in testing an alternative equation.
Disputing his work without proof, or even a basic alternative equation, on the other hand...
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol hello skunk works.
My word Einstein's a touchy subject ain't it.
LATE RICHARD FEYNMAN SAID ' IF A THEORY NO MATTER HOWEVER ELEGANT, DOES NOT AGREE WITH EXPT. IT IS WRONG'.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol hello skunk works.
My word Einstein's a touchy subject ain't it.
No. However, threads without scientific evidence (regardless of the subject) do not belong in the science forum. In the science forum, you are expected to show proof, which would require you to address questions about Einstein's field equations and to provide empirical evidence of your claims.
You have been relieved of that burden.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
LATE RICHARD FEYNMAN SAID ' IF A THEORY NO MATTER HOWEVER ELEGANT, DOES NOT AGREE WITH EXPT. IT IS WRONG'.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol hello skunk works.
My word Einstein's a touchy subject ain't it.
No. However, threads without scientific evidence (regardless of the subject) do not belong in the science forum. In the science forum, you are expected to show proof, which would require you to address questions about Einstein's field equations and to provide empirical evidence of your claims.
You have been relieved of that burden.
SO IF THE TIME ASPECT OF GR IS WRONG AS PROVED IN THE OP, THE WHOLE OF GR GOES OUT THE WINDOW.
SO THERE
QED
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei
Now, if you would have, at least, given some sort of evidence that "GR is bunk", I doubt this would have been moved to skunk works.