It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IVE ADDRESSED ALL THE ISSUES, STICK TO THE EXPT IN THE OP.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Nochzwei
There is no such thing as a "bunk" question.
You've an opportunity here to educate, because apparently you're seeing something no one else is...
That is one hell of an opportunity. Much like Einstein did with his theories...
So.
Ball. Your court. Have at it.
Like ive said i dont dwell on the bunk field equations.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: dragonridr
yes ive heard all that before. believe what you please
originally posted by: Nochzwei
And no more of phd friend in NIST knowing some chow mein experimenter...
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Like ive said i dont dwell on the bunk field equations.
originally posted by: Greggers
Question for the OP: Can you at least identify which of Einsteins field equations you would use to prove that GR doesn't match this particular observed reality?
originally posted by: ScrappyJ
Time does stop at the event horizon of a black hole ....
We don't think your perception of time would change as you fell past the event horizon either, if the black hole had a large enough event horizon so you could survive, which the supermassive black holes do. So time wouldn't stop at the event horizon for the person falling in.
originally posted by: ScrappyJ
Although ones perception of time I don't believe would change as you fell into the singularity...