It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Its not hard to realize both candidates are flawed, even if youre voting for one of them
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: DJW001
You don't get it, Khan took his noble scarify and put it on the spot line when he decided to make a pawn of himself in behave of Clinton campaign.
That is the part you don't seem to get, he put the memory of his death son in the spot light for political gain.
The only one to blame for this is Khan himself.
I guess people tend to have selected memories, we have another person that never experienced sacrifices because it dodged the draft and still he became a president, so the Trump sacrifices attack is mute
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: bknapple32
I have three members of my family that died for this nation they are also heroes, so yes I have all the right in this world to speak my mind and used this type of rhetoric, the sacrifices of my loves make sure I do
How about that.
Ask me about sacrifices I got a ton to talk about and I don't have to stand in a circus of political crap to show them.
When asked about the recent bloodshed in San Bernardino and other attacks, like the 2009 massacre at Fort Hood, where Nidal Hasan, a veteran, killed 13 people in the name of radical Islam, Khan remembers a conversation with his other son. Shaharyar Khan, the brother of the late Humayun, told his father that Muslim communities share in the responsibility for rooting out extremism.
“This is the time for us American Muslims to rat out any traitor who walks amongst us. This is high time for Muslims to stand firm [against terrorists],” the elder Khan recounted. “Among us hides the enemies of the value system of this country. And we need to defend it. And if it means ratting out the traitors who hide behind an American passport, that’s what we need to do.”
originally posted by: Gin
originally posted by: Sillyolme
All bull. You guys know it's lies and like that lyin trump who lies just because. He inflates his importance. Oh I know Putin. I have a relationship with Putin. We were stablemates We had a nice conversation. He's very interested in what we're doing .
Or
I never met Putin I don't have a relationship with him. Well describe relationship. He had nice things to say about me. (Which we all know is top priority with ego centric trump. )
He lies day in and day out.
This is others lyin for him. Cuz he's lyin trump. Fibber McGhee, Perfidious J. Trump, Deceitful Donny the double dealing double crossing candidate.
Now you are rambling incoherently. How about you stick to the subject of this thread, which is about Khan and not Trump.
He has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, he has connections to immigration, he has connections to the Saudi Arabia. Things that have been dug about Khizr are not lies. It's called journalism, and they have done their research.
Take the blinders off and read up these below.
‘I Was Just Joking’: Media Apoplectic as Khizr Khan Attack on Donald Trump Goes Down in Flames
What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States
"As Breitbart News showed on Monday midday, that clearly was not the case. Khizr Khan has all sorts of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clintons through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP. That firm did Hillary Clinton's taxes for years, starting when Khan still worked there involved in, according to his own website, matters "firm wide"- back in 2004. It also has represented, for years, the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States. Saudi Arabia, of course, is a Clinton Foundation donor which- along with the mega-bundlers of thousands upon thousands in political donations to both of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016- plays right into the "Clinton Cash" narrative.
"All of this information was publicly available, and accessible to anyone-including any of these reporters, and Breitbart News- with a basic Google search. Anyone interested in doing research about the subjects they are reporting on-otherwise known as responsible journalism- would have checked into these matters. But clearly, none in the mainstream media did- probably because, as Fox News' Chad Pergram noted, Democrats "sense blood in the water over" the whole Khan controversy."
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No this what happen when you allow your hero son to be used for political gain, I find it despicable.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Just remember the death of those that came before us are the ones that have given us the right to the freedoms we enjoy today, I will make no excuses for that.
But I will condom the used of these noble heroes sacrifices for political gain.