Anyone Wish Conservative Media Would Stop With All the Fake Scandals???

a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Agreed

EXCEPT

that we DO know a LOT about what the screechy one stands for:

1. Compulsive lying
2. Marxism

3. Actively practicing witchcraft per Secret Service assertions about her monthly trips to LA for her coven . . . ceremonies . . . likely including satan worship.

4. Globalism wholesale and ASAP

5. Homicides convenient to their corruption, greed and power-mongering
6. Trashing, using, abusing, manipulating, deceiving "the little people" . . . common citizens of the Republic

7. Wholesale corruption; theft on a grand scale; pay-for-play schemes on a grand scale . . .

8. Treason on a grand scale--giving/selling nuclear missile tech to China; other governmental favors to the highest foreign bidder; . . . this item alone could have dozens of sub-sections

9. Hypocrisy on a grand scale . . . laughs at getting a child rapist off when she knew he was guilty; trashed women the slick one raped while spewing the wholesale lie that she was supportive of WOMEN! What a farce.

10. Hostility to Christianity in favor of blood-thirsty, blood-lust Jihadi types and groups.

. . .
. . .

The list could go on for quite a while.

We DO KNOW a LOT about her values, her actions, her choices.

REMEMBER: THE BEST PREDICTOR OF FUTURE BEHAVIOR IS PAST BEHAVIOR.

If she gets in again . . . the population best learn to lean over and grab their ankles as the standard posture.

a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Hillary. I am not afraid of the russians. I use to hide under my school desk in the 50's, training for them to drop bombs on us. Heck, my dad dug a hole in the ground, called it a fallout shelter.


ETA Yes, I am that old. I was in grade school in 1956.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

First off as a disclaimer, I am not a fan of Hillary nor any politician really. However, I am SOOO flipping tired of conservative medias constant lies... Lies that apparently their viewers can't see through...




..........................Benghazi

Enlighten me.

Benghazi, you know, the incident that was investigated morethan 9/11. Just a coincidence 9.11 perfectly favoured the ZIonist-Chrsitian dynasty and their objective at the time of invading 7 countries in 5 years.

Also a coincidence Benghazi was reportedly against "Bib's" wishes, so it was some kind of punishment by Mossad. And in investigation into it, further punishment?

Seems people have far less questions asked if you just stick to the pro-Bush-Christian-Zionist plans of world domination, they were drummed up a long time ago after all:

In 1844, Christian restorationist George Bush, a professor of Hebrew at New York University and distantly related to the Bush political family, published a book entitled The Valley of Vision; or, The Dry Bones of Israel Revived.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Hillary. I am not afraid of the russians. I use to hide under my school desk in the 50's, training for them to drop bombs on us. Heck, my dad dug a hole in the ground, called it a fallout shelter.


ETA Yes, I am that old. I was in grade school in 1956.

I wonder weather Russia was really ever a true enemy, or if they were more of a competitor and regan and others used them as a straw man to activate their voters?

a reply to: JoshuaCox

IMO, after WW2 it was a race for dominance over Europe, while vulnerable. Corps and government in cahoots, communist or US. At the time, we were called a democracy. After what we did to Japan, the use and power of nuclear war threats were very effective.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Hillary. I am not afraid of the russians. I use to hide under my school desk in the 50's, training for them to drop bombs on us. Heck, my dad dug a hole in the ground, called it a fallout shelter.


ETA Yes, I am that old. I was in grade school in 1956.

As with most Hillary supporters, you are completely out of touch. Quit buying into the Russia propaganda you're being fed.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Hillary. I am not afraid of the russians. I use to hide under my school desk in the 50's, training for them to drop bombs on us. Heck, my dad dug a hole in the ground, called it a fallout shelter.


ETA Yes, I am that old. I was in grade school in 1956.

I wonder weather Russia was really ever a true enemy, or if they were more of a competitor and regan and others used them as a straw man to activate their voters?

Seriously?? I'm guessing history is not your strong suit. Suggest you start with wirld war 2 and stalin.

a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Couldn't help myself. Besides, I can believe what I want about Trump, facts or not, just like republicans treat Hillary. Tit for tat. Trump himself, leads the way presenting gossip as facts, like high school tit for tat. Like he did with Cruz family.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Perhaps if you GREATLY MORE studied the oligarchy's statements in their own words and publications the last 100+ years, you'd have a better grasp of how they pull such things off.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Perhaps if you GREATLY MORE studied the oligarchy's statements in their own words and publications the last 100+ years, you'd have a better grasp of how they pull such things off.

That's half the point lmao!! Their words arnt bad, because every single conservative source will add the disclaimer:

" I know they didn't SAY they want to ban all guns, but we know what they really mean..."


Because their words actually in context are not saying :

"We want the illuminati to kill off half the population."

Socialism

Globalism

Sustainablity

Exc

Are only inherently evil in right wing world. In REALITY they are niether good or bad, it all depends on the person in charge and the way they are used.

I will never understand how tptb tricked people into hating words that don't have a negative definition..

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Perhaps if you GREATLY MORE studied the oligarchy's statements in their own words and publications the last 100+ years, you'd have a better grasp of how they pull such things off.

Perhaps if you started watching accredited media and stopped believing anything you see on apocalyptic Christian conspiracy sites....

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: ScriptedSociety

Couldn't help myself. Besides, I can believe what I want about Trump, facts or not, just like republicans treat Hillary. Tit for tat. Trump himself, leads the way presenting gossip as facts, like high school tit for tat. Like he did with Cruz family.

The Cruz thing was incredibly spiteful, but the best political assassination in history...thank god he didn't win the nomination.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: JoshuaCox

IMO, after WW2 it was a race for dominance over Europe, while vulnerable. Corps and government in cahoots, communist or US. At the time, we were called a democracy. After what we did to Japan, the use and power of nuclear war threats were very effective.

I meant was Russia ever really after us and wanting war and the fall of America, or if it was all just propaganda.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I think they were afraid of us and did a lot of blustering/propaganda.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I'm still reading little to no evidence that you've studied the topic very seriously for very long.

And, they HAVE said in multiple places that they will confiscate guns . . . and freedoms . . . and exterminate billions of lives.

Perhaps your research time and/or skills are too limited for in-depth study.

How many 10's of THOUSANDS of pages would you guess you've read . . . particularly in their own words and publications?

a reply to: JoshuaCox

If your ASSUMPTIONS about the oligarchy are as amiss as those about me,

no wonder you have negligible understanding of the realities involved.

I've studied the oligarchy in their own words since 1962.

How long have you studied them?

How old are you?

I've probably read more than 30,000 pages--many of them in their own words, some of them primary sources.

You are aware of what "PRIMARY SOURCES" are, aren't you?

I learned that in High School.

But, please carry on . . . . your posts help make your perspective all the more vividly absurd.

And that's good for those who are very uninformed to observe.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: JoshuaCox

I think they were afraid of us and did a lot of blustering/propaganda.

So both countries used the other as a straw man.. I buy that.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: JoshuaCox

If your ASSUMPTIONS about the oligarchy are as amiss as those about me,

no wonder you have negligible understanding of the realities involved.

I've studied the oligarchy in their own words since 1962.

How long have you studied them?

How old are you?

I've probably read more than 30,000 pages--many of them in their own words, some of them primary sources.

You are aware of what "PRIMARY SOURCES" are, aren't you?

I learned that in High School.

But, please carry on . . . . your posts help make your perspective all the more vividly absurd.

And that's good for those who are very uninformed to observe.

I'm 35.

Your forgetting to mention those quotes from primary sources were on unaccredited websites with zero accountability.


If not post them from a credible site, none of that :

"They didn't say X, but I know what they really mean garbage."

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh . . .

WRONG again . . .

In my undergrad program, I was acting director of the University Library's Special Collections Dept.

We were one of two universities in the USA which collected BOTH extreme left all the way over through to the extreme right wing stuff.

We may have had one of the largest collections of oligarchy related publications in any university.

This was between 1965-1969.

HINT: There were no public websites then.

I read the oligarchy's own publications in their own words.

FYI, the stuff on the better conservative websites is accurate.

So, yet again, two of your major ASSUMPTIONS and unfounded BELIEFS

about me and the accuracy of the information

ARE WRONG.

Words are wind, provide proof from a credible source.