How comical.
Not Junkers or what he said, but how the rabid ET debunkers are scrambling at anything to explain away what was said, apart from confronting what he
actually said!
Typical of this place and it's regular chorus of dogmatic mouthpieces.
We have people claiming that what was said was an error of context or meaning or usage, then we have others claiming to speak French who offer a
'rough translation' of what he said...not really useful when others are talking about errors in language usage, perhaps it would be better to try for
an 'exact translation' instead? Not difficult if you can speak the language that was being used.
Failing the option to rubbish the language, others prefer to fall back on the good old character assasination and claim he is drunk...classics are the
best aren't they!
This guy isn't some low level official...this is the EU commission president. I realise Bush Jnr let go of some verbal howlers as US president, but
come on...No leader anywhere can surely match Bush Jnr?
Besides, since the entire place is filled with people who's native language is not English, there are world class translators pumping live
translations into each and every members earpieces as he spoke. The transcripts of which will probably be available online somewhere as minutes of the
meeting or similar.
But...
What if Junkers knew exactly what he was saying, and deliberately let the cat out of the bag?
What then? Another way to approach this is let's just go along with the debunkers and say nothing was actually said and think about this question
instead;
If ET really does want us to come together as a united species, yes...as in a 'world order', or united Earth, in order for them to be able to interact
and deal with us as an 'adult' species, instead of squabbling, nasty and disparate children we essentially are now, and won't do so unless or until we
are united as a species...what then?
Would you be in favour of a United Humanity (UH?) , or New world order that meant we were acting as 'one people' without borders etc, if it meant
phenomenal positives for us all?
And what if those positives for our species included;
Unlimited cost free energy, dramatic life extension (many times that of the average lifespan today for example) and astounding increases in quality of
physical and mental health, clean environments / air quality, technologies enabling casual, fast and efficient travel around our solar system for the
masses, not just selected individuals like astronauts / cosmonauts, abundant foods for everyone available at the point of requirement, all while
maintaining a pristine biosphere and scientific insights that make what we think we know now seem as deep and thought provoking as the toddlers
reading book 'spot the dog'?
What then?
Would GB rejoin the EU? Would the EU join with other trading blocs to form a super state? Would that super state then expand to form a single
governmental entity, akin to the New World Order?
If not, why not?
Remember the positives, and remember the 15th century South American natives, North American Indians were slaughtered because of Humanity's greed, the
ET's with their stupendous technology would have no need of greed, seeing as they could obtain or create anything that could be found on this planet,
anywhere else they wanted unlike the Spanish or the White man of centuries ago.
Would you want a new world order under this scenario, or would you still cling on to nationalism and forego all that would be gained?
edit on 1 7 2016 by MysterX because: typo
edit on 1 7 2016 by MysterX because: typo