It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: easynow
a reply to: wmd_2008
From what I have read on here over the last few years this place should be full of real undeniable evidence or is it populated by fantasists
What would you consider to be undeniable evidence ?
An Alien body ?
A spaceship ?
What exactly would be proof to you ?
Just wondering
originally posted by: wmd_2008
originally posted by: easynow
a reply to: wmd_2008
From what I have read on here over the last few years this place should be full of real undeniable evidence or is it populated by fantasists
What would you consider to be undeniable evidence ?
An Alien body ?
A spaceship ?
What exactly would be proof to you ?
Just wondering
If you look at the OP you shouldn't have to ask and as stated a few times on this thread alone certain members claim regular sightings even communications with ufo's. One member claimed that these things have appeared near his house on a regular basis yet when challenge for proof ie pictures/video a LAME excuse that they would know and never come back was given.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: jamespond
Well actually my assumption there does have a basis. You see while WWII was in full swing, the pilots that fought in it were reporting unknown objects that were flying alongside them in the skies, they called these things foo fighters. If this had been secret technology, as you say, then if it belonged to the allies they would of used it. Likewise, if it had been the Nazi's they would of used it. So this is where the advanced government technology argument starts to fall apart
Or does the advanced government technology argument start to fall apart?
Because there are a number of theories regarding foo fighters that don't subscribe to the "alien" spacecraft theory
Or another that "foo" was caused by the first airborne radar the H2S system.
The problem with linking UFOs to aliens is that there is nothing beyond anecdotal evidence to show for it. 'Unknown' doesn't mean anything more than it is unexplained. Unexplained doesn't mean it was anything extra-terrestrial.
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: jamespond
That picture above was posted on here by one of the biggest ufo/secret space fleet/bases on the Moon believers and he thought the Turkish videos were not a ufo.
What are the chances of Mog from Zogs ship being the perfect match for part of a cruise ship that sailed in that area.
His words
And I know you don't like the ship idea but don't you find is very odd that if you overlay the UFO onto the bridge of the docked cruise ship that the angle, size and shape just happen to match?
But seeing extra-terrestrials DOES mean it is extra-terrestrials
originally posted by: easynow
I'd still like to know what you think real evidence or proof is.
I've asked a few people that question and usually they can't really give a clear answer.
originally posted by: Raxoxane
It is not my responsibility to prove the existence of ufo's to the world. I share my sightings here for those who also know and have witnessed the phenomenon.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
But seeing extra-terrestrials DOES mean it is extra-terrestrials
Well of course it does quite literally. .Just like seeing god means it's god. But unfortunately proof of aliens (or god) does not exist and so people are left with a choice of belief. Do you ever question your belief?
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: easynow
I'd still like to know what you think real evidence or proof is.
I've asked a few people that question and usually they can't really give a clear answer.
Let me drag my list out again. My requirements for proof are only slightly more rigorous than they would be for proving anything exists, including the Eiffel Tower, or the chair you're sitting on right now. That's because we're dealing with something we do not all agree exists, unlike the Eiffel Tower or your chair, which we all mostly agree at least CAN exist. All I would like -- in increasing order of importance -- is:
1. Multiple photos of the same object, taken by different people at the same time, with NONE of them being anonymous.
2. A physical object (preferably a live alien) of some kind that can be linked by a clear chain of evidence to the thing in the photos.
3. Multiple independent laboratories verifying that the physical object in question is definitely and unequivocally from another world (or dimension).
4. Persons of authority, including heads of state such as the President and the Pope, along with noted hardcore skeptics, verifying that the independent labs are correct and that the physical object is "alien."
5. The possibility, however remote, for me to actually get a chance to see and touch the object in question.
You could say that these requirements are too high. I could respond that your requirements are too low. After all, we're talking about proving the objective existence of something.
originally posted by: easynow
If you've set the bar that high ... why bother dragging yourself to a ufo forum everyday ?
Are you expecting someone to post all that proof ?