It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From: Abedin, Huma
To: Sullivan, Jacob J.
Sent: Thursday, April 16 18:54:22 2009
Subject:
I have to go to the dinner with her [state dinner in Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic]
I just got the I’m exhausted thing from her and Eugene [likely Eugene Bae, Clinton’s advance official] isn’t going to be able to tell Oscar de la Renta to shut up.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: UnBreakable
She thinks she's a dog.
One thing that we know of that she isn't confused about, anyway.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
Nearly everyone is overtired or overworked from time to time. Such instances of temporary fatigue usually have an identifiable cause and a likely remedy.
Unrelenting exhaustion, on the other hand, lasts longer, is more profound and isn't relieved by rest. It's a nearly constant state of weariness that develops over time and reduces your energy, motivation and concentration. Fatigue at this level impacts your emotional and psychological well-being, too.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.
Many, if not most, of "you" are confused about what happened in Benghazi due to bad sources and misinformation.
Who are you to criticize anyone else about being confused?
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.
Many, if not most, of "you" are confused about what happened in Benghazi due to bad sources and misinformation.
Who are you to criticize anyone else about being confused?
Right...thanks for reminding me, introvert.
Crooked Hillary was 'confused' about Benghazi too; she told everyone the attack was because of a youtube video.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers
That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.
Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.
originally posted by: rollanotherone
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers
That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.
Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.
That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: rollanotherone
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers
That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.
Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.
That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.
I hate to ask this, because I fear the answer, but you do know the difference between a "hack" and a "hacker", right?
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: rollanotherone
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN
Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.
What crime was she convicted of?
That's new to me.
I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.
An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?
Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".
If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.
Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.
Then you can't call her a criminal yet.
Precisely my point.
When did I?
I used the term 'you" in a general sense.
When you do that don't quote someone.
Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.
Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.
but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?
Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.
If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers
That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.
Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.
That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.
I hate to ask this, because I fear the answer, but you do know the difference between a "hack" and a "hacker", right?
Guccifer is an admitted hacker, all jokes aside.
Were it not for his hacking we may have never learned of Hillary's private and up to that point almost secret server.