It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary is "often confused" says Huma

page: 5
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2016 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Those emails I speak of include the following:


From: Abedin, Huma
To: Sullivan, Jacob J.
Sent: Thursday, April 16 18:54:22 2009
Subject:

I have to go to the dinner with her [state dinner in Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic]
I just got the I’m exhausted thing from her and Eugene [likely Eugene Bae, Clinton’s advance official] isn’t going to be able to tell Oscar de la Renta to shut up.


source

That,"I just got the exhausted thing from her" bespeaks a long time pattern of behavior.

Documented fact.




posted on May, 7 2016 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: UnBreakable


She thinks she's a dog. 


One thing that we know of that she isn't confused about, anyway.

Wait. I thought ole Billy Boy was the dog!?!? Now I'm confused.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Exhaustion is not the same as confusion.

I shouldn't have to point that out to anyone.
edit on 7-5-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 07:57 PM
link   
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.


Many, if not most, of "you" are confused about what happened in Benghazi due to bad sources and misinformation.

Who are you to criticize anyone else about being confused?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Shall I take you to school?


Nearly everyone is overtired or overworked from time to time. Such instances of temporary fatigue usually have an identifiable cause and a likely remedy.

Unrelenting exhaustion, on the other hand, lasts longer, is more profound and isn't relieved by rest. It's a nearly constant state of weariness that develops over time and reduces your energy, motivation and concentration. Fatigue at this level impacts your emotional and psychological well-being, too.


Mayo Clinic

It stands to reason (I know you're a reasonable fellow) that if your concentration is reduced and psychological well-being is impacted, confusion would be the result.
edit on 7-5-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.


Many, if not most, of "you" are confused about what happened in Benghazi due to bad sources and misinformation.

Who are you to criticize anyone else about being confused?

Right...thanks for reminding me, introvert.
Crooked Hillary was 'confused' about Benghazi too; she told everyone the attack was because of a youtube video.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers


That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.

Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

It very well could be the result. But I cannot make any determination whatsoever because we still have no clue of the context in which the email refers and I am not able to access her medical records.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was confused about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Happens all the time.
Poor Dear.


Many, if not most, of "you" are confused about what happened in Benghazi due to bad sources and misinformation.

Who are you to criticize anyone else about being confused?

Right...thanks for reminding me, introvert.
Crooked Hillary was 'confused' about Benghazi too; she told everyone the attack was because of a youtube video.


Or she lied. Who knows?

Fact remains, even if she was confused or outright lied, she was cleared of any wrongdoing.

All you are doing is beating a horse that has been beaten so much it's just a # stain on the minds of the ignorant.

Why would an intelligent person continue to do that?
edit on 7-5-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

She's entering advanced stages.

I bet they have to heavily medicate her before any public appearances.

The warning signs are obvious.




posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Domo1

Where is this from?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers


That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.

Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.


That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Domo1

Where's the email before this? What is it that is "very important to do" that she might be confused about. Wasn't this also like a month after she suffered that concussion that Karl Rove tried so hard to capitalize on?

Fast forward three years and she more than held her own against a panel of hostile Republicans for 10 straight hours of questioning on national television. I don't know how more vetted her mental acuity could be.

Disagree with her policies, say what you will about with her past positions, poor decisions, flip-flopping, disingenuous behavior, lying, etc (I know, I could be talking about Donald Trump here) but there's nothing about her recent behavior that makes her seem easily confused — if anything, she seems more hawkish than before.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers


That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.

Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.


That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.


I hate to ask this, because I fear the answer, but you do know the difference between a "hack" and a "hacker", right?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
Looks like another one of her con jobs to make it look like she wasn't responsible for her actions

a reply to: seagull



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Domo1

Where is this from?

From Hilldog's #1 aide Human Abedin.
She says Hillary is often confused.
Great Presidential quality, right?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers


That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.

Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.


That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.


I hate to ask this, because I fear the answer, but you do know the difference between a "hack" and a "hacker", right?

Guccifer is an admitted hacker, all jokes aside.

Were it not for his hacking we may have never learned of Hillary's private and up to that point almost secret server.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: BO XIAN



Not just the mildly illegal--the brazenly criminal--with the cheek to act like it was her 'divine right' . . . to 'off with their heads' or whatever struck her evil whims.


What crime was she convicted of?

That's new to me.

I'm not sure if you are just playing ignorant, but there is kinda this whole FBI investigation going on.


An investigation is not a conviction. You do know that, right?

Tell me what she's been convicted of to justify calling her a "brazen criminal".

If there wasn't something she might be convicted of there would be no investigation.

Just because her past hasn't led to any convictions doesn't mean her future won't.


Then you can't call her a criminal yet.

Precisely my point.

When did I?


I used the term 'you" in a general sense.

When you do that don't quote someone.


Then stop responding to my posts. Problem solved.

Otherwise, I shall do as I please and clarify when needed...as I just did.


but I responded specifically to you, not the masses, see how that works?


Let's wait to see if she is taken to trail and convicted first.

If she's taken to the trail she will be convicted by her peers


That's legally binding and adheres to the process of the law. As it should be.

Being found guilty by internet hacks that can't keep their facts straight is meaningless.


That's funny. Because it's Internet hackers that brought this story to light.


I hate to ask this, because I fear the answer, but you do know the difference between a "hack" and a "hacker", right?

Guccifer is an admitted hacker, all jokes aside.

Were it not for his hacking we may have never learned of Hillary's private and up to that point almost secret server.


That has nothing to do with my statement. Focus ladies.

Stay on point.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join