It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: jacygirl
Again, you are using peoples misspellings to support your case. He spells it wrong on his site, even though the linked work shows Berenstain. We have proven unequivocally in the Berenstain thread that SPELL CHECK corrects Berenstain to Berenstein and Bernstein depending on the editor.
You guys don't make yourselves look believable or intelligent when using these types of things to support the Mandela Effect. It's almost like you are trolling.
why 1989 ?
originally posted by: Baddogma
and I had my own rabbit hole with alleged secret space programs (a la astr0) where it was mentioned in a thread that the first faster than light attempts were made in the late 80's.. .heh... that's all!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
Nope. Not imaginary at all. I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon that should be carefully studied by sociologists, and I would add, psychologists involved in cognition, memory, etc. Probably also anthropologists. It's fascinating!
Every example or point-of-evidence of "the Effect" that I have seen thus far can be explained in a reasonable, non-fantastic way as the effect of a combination of common mistakes, faulty memories, flawed perceptions, increased communicative options via the internet, and general hubris.
Not imaginary at all.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
Nope. Not imaginary at all. I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon that should be carefully studied by sociologists, and I would add, psychologists involved in cognition, memory, etc. Probably also anthropologists. It's fascinating!
Every example or point-of-evidence of "the Effect" that I have seen thus far can be explained in a reasonable, non-fantastic way as the effect of a combination of common mistakes, faulty memories, flawed perceptions, increased communicative options via the internet, and general hubris.
Not imaginary at all.
Yes and we just proved that at some point those explanations will inevitably fall apart.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yup, either way it's fascinating!
Interesting to psychiatrists/neurologists/sociologists/folklorists ... and/or quantum physicists/mystics!
I just broke through into really considering the latter, myself... but all doors remain wide open, here.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
Well you need to make up your mind if you think the Mandela Effects are real or imaginary then.
We can't have a breakthrough with such inconsistency of your fundamental stance on the matter.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
Nope. Not imaginary at all. I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon that should be carefully studied by sociologists, and I would add, psychologists involved in cognition, memory, etc. Probably also anthropologists. It's fascinating!
Every example or point-of-evidence of "the Effect" that I have seen thus far can be explained in a reasonable, non-fantastic way as the effect of a combination of common mistakes, faulty memories, flawed perceptions, increased communicative options via the internet, and general hubris.
Not imaginary at all.
Yes and we just proved that at some point those explanations will inevitably fall apart.
Perhaps you proved that to yourself, but in all respect, you've not proven anything about memory, faulty or otherwise, in our interaction. You made up a question that has no basis in reality, you refined that question based on my responses until you got an answer that you wanted, and now, you're trying to restate or rephrase all of that into your claim (which I hesitate to point out, you started with) that "faulty memories don't explain the 'Mandela Effect'"
Nothing in our conversation does that in any way. /shrug You proved that I personally, if faced with an impossible conundrum of extraordinary proportions that had no reasonable explanation, would conclude that I was insane.
That's it.