It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: schmae
a reply to: tigertatzen
Playing back your memories like a movie sounds terrifying and blissful at the same time. Must be interesting.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
Well you need to make up your mind if you think the Mandela Effects are real or imaginary then.
We can't have a breakthrough with such inconsistency of your fundamental stance on the matter.
LOL. I've stated very clearly what I believe above. Repeatedly. One thing I have NEVER said is that the "Mandela Effect" is imaginary. If I have, quote me.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yup, my own thread trying to deconstruct it's possibility went all over the place.. . but let's just say some fine, skeptical minds were left scratching their heads over that one... and there was/is hard to disprove evidence strewn about and it takes hundreds of hours to really connect it all...
but it is included along with this ME as those rare instances were there might be a "there there".. .meaning some of the most "probable" outlandish tales discussed on this site (etc).
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
Well you need to make up your mind if you think the Mandela Effects are real or imaginary then.
We can't have a breakthrough with such inconsistency of your fundamental stance on the matter.
LOL. I've stated very clearly what I believe above. Repeatedly. One thing I have NEVER said is that the "Mandela Effect" is imaginary. If I have, quote me.
You said it's all to do with memory, therefore, imagined.
And you also agreed that at some point memory can't explain it.
Then you say it's imaginary
Then you say it's real!
Not very rational or logical of you is it!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
Well you need to make up your mind if you think the Mandela Effects are real or imaginary then.
We can't have a breakthrough with such inconsistency of your fundamental stance on the matter.
LOL. I've stated very clearly what I believe above. Repeatedly. One thing I have NEVER said is that the "Mandela Effect" is imaginary. If I have, quote me.
You said it's all to do with memory, therefore, imagined.
And you also agreed that at some point memory can't explain it.
Then you say it's imaginary
Then you say it's real!
Not very rational or logical of you is it!
No, actually, I haven't said any of that.
Read back. Quote me.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
originally posted by: schmae
a reply to: beansidhe
I have been asking everyone I know about Reba's name. I know many country fans. So far no one remembers anything but McEntire. For what that's worth.
ETA Honestly why is there not a really big event that is in question here? In the big picture a childrens' book title or a washed up country singer's name or a candy bar just don't seem like big events to me.
As for the folks who remember seeing Mandela's funeral, what age were you when you remember seeing this ? That may be the biggest factor here is the age of the person at the time of the ' wrong' memory .
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
I don't see what that has to do with the topic.
Now that we've proved Mandela Effects aren't real what does it matter anyway?
originally posted by: AcerM
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
I don't see what that has to do with the topic.
Now that we've proved Mandela Effects aren't real what does it matter anyway?
You understand there's people who've found over 500 effects already, I'm sticking with them.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: AcerM
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
I don't see what that has to do with the topic.
Now that we've proved Mandela Effects aren't real what does it matter anyway?
You understand there's people who've found over 500 effects already, I'm sticking with them.
Yes but as Gryphon66 has proved ever single one of those 500 is imaginary.
But Gryphon66 also says it's real so I don't know what Gryphon66 is smoking
originally posted by: AcerM
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: AcerM
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
I don't see what that has to do with the topic.
Now that we've proved Mandela Effects aren't real what does it matter anyway?
You understand there's people who've found over 500 effects already, I'm sticking with them.
Yes but as Gryphon66 has proved ever single one of those 500 is imaginary.
But Gryphon66 also says it's real so I don't know what Gryphon66 is smoking
I just watched Byron Preston channel videos, guy has been into this a while. I recommend to watch them all immediately. www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Waking up with a different spouse of a different gender would be attributable to a serious memory lapse (ed. or brain trauma).
Stroke, perhaps? Did I hit my head or something while I was asleep?
Nope, you have no head trauma. CAT scan shows no anomalies. You also are cleared of any mental health issues. You're completely sane.
You go back home to Colin.
Are you thinking:
"Something's not right here"
Or are you thinking:
"Wow memory sure is a funny old thing isn't it"
Straight answer.
This is important
You are begging the question to get the answer you want.
And no I didn't want a specific answer.
I just knew the answer you didn't want to give...
Yes, quite plainly, you were trying to limit your questions to provoke an answer.
Did you get it? Good. What does it have to do with "The Mandela Effect"?
From the data gathered from the experiment we now rationally know at what point "faulty memory" can not explain a Mandela Effect.
The subject's (your) reaction to the hypothetical scenario he was placed in shows logical evidence that at some point the "faulty memory" hypothesis falls apart.
Thank you for participating Gryph
No, actually it shows nothing of the sort as the two scenarios are not even similar.
The "Mandela Effect" is a real-world cultural phenomenon with massive attribution. It exists.
Your "example" was contrived and has no basis whatever in any reality. It was imaginary.
My answers say nothing about "faulty memories" because there were none involved.
But by YOUR reasoning ALL Mandela Effects are imaginary.
I have stated, repeatedly, that the "Mandela Effect" is a real cultural phenomenon
Well you need to make up your mind if you think the Mandela Effects are real or imaginary then.
We can't have a breakthrough with such inconsistency of your fundamental stance on the matter.
LOL. I've stated very clearly what I believe above. Repeatedly. One thing I have NEVER said is that the "Mandela Effect" is imaginary. If I have, quote me.
You said it's all to do with memory, therefore, imagined.
And you also agreed that at some point memory can't explain it.
Then you say it's imaginary
Then you say it's real!
Not very rational or logical of you is it!
No, actually, I haven't said any of that.
Read back. Quote me.
"faulty memories don't explain the 'Mandela Effect'"
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ruiner1978
My waking up next to "Colin" is more likely than you've realized.
So are you saying being married to Colin is one of you real or fake memories?
Nothing on New Zealand or Sri Lanka from you then?
Pity.
I don't see what that has to do with the topic.
Now that we've proved Mandela Effects aren't real what does it matter anyway?