It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The public defunding of Planned Parenthood in Texas may have led to a decrease in highly effective forms of contraceptive services and an increase in Medicaid-paid childbirths among women who previously used injectable contraception, according to a peer-reviewed study by University of Texas at Austin researchers.
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Feb. 3, used administrative records to assess rates of the provision of contraceptives, as well as deliveries (childbirth) covered by Medicaid from 2011 through 2014 -- before and after Texas excluded Planned Parenthood affiliates from a publicly funded women's health program.
"Providers who are mission-driven and have the requisite experience and knowledge are critical in providing the most effective methods of contraception -- IUDs, implants and injectables," said Joseph Potter, director of the Texas Policy Evaluation Project and professor in the university's Population Research Center. "From a demographic perspective, this is important because these methods dramatically decrease unintended pregnancy. We also have accumulating evidence of an unmet demand for these methods in Texas."
The study also noted a 27 percent increase in the rate of deliveries paid for by Medicaid among women who received injectable contraceptives prior to funding being barred for Planned Parenthood.
originally posted by: dawnstar
can you imagine the consequences if a zika virus outbreak was added to the mix? But, they will just come on and say that if we don't want kids, we shouldn't be having sex....
as if that advice was ever helpful...
and the result has been more unwanted pregnancies, increased demand for services from Medicaid, and, ultimately more children born into to poverty.
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: DJW001
and the result has been more unwanted pregnancies, increased demand for services from Medicaid, and, ultimately more children born into to poverty.
See if you aren't killing babies then more babies are born. It is simple math. If the poor can't afford abortions because they are no longer free then it is logical that the "children born into poverty" would go up.
See if you use statics without facts you can twist and turn it any way you want to
The first blow to Planned Parenthood and other family planning clinics in Texas came in 2011, when lawmakers cut family-planning grants by 66% across the state. The money that remained was directed toward community health centers and county health departments that provide more comprehensive care.
This dramatic cut in funding was responsible for the closure of 82 family-planning clinics in the state, researchers said. About one-third of them were affiliated with Planned Parenthood.
News reports at the time suggested the move was motivated, at least in part, by a desire to keep money away from groups that might refer women to abortion clinics.
“Of course this is a war on birth control and abortions and everything — that's what family planning is supposed to be about,” then-state Rep. Wayne Christian, an East Texas Republican, said in 2011.
The state’s federally funded Medicaid program was not allowed to steer funds away from Planned Parenthood clinics. So in 2013, the state ditched it and set up the state-funded Texas Women’s Health Program, which could legally withhold funds from any clinic affiliated with an abortion provider.
www.latimes.com...
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: DJW001
If they cut funding they will just have to sell more baby parts. (sarc off)
Doesn't say why they cut funding, what funding aren't they cutting nowadays?
They are cutting funding because some people believed the body part selling hoax.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: DJW001
If they cut funding they will just have to sell more baby parts. (sarc off)
Doesn't say why they cut funding, what funding aren't they cutting nowadays?
They are cutting funding because some people believed the body part selling hoax.
Whats your source? Linked article doesn't state that.
The state’s move to end the HIV prevention funding is the latest in its ongoing efforts to cut off taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood. It comes two months after Texas Republican leaders announced they would kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid, the joint federal-state insurer of the poor.
That action was spurred by the release of undercover videos of Planned Parenthood officials purportedly showing that the organization improperly harvested aborted fetal tissue for researchers — a claim the group has vehemently denied.
While the group's abortion services are separate from its health care programs, the flare-up propelled Republican leaders to call for defunding Planned Parenthood entirely, including the $3.1 million it receives through Medicaid in Texas to help low-income women access family planning and well-woman services.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Yeah, but you gotta admit there was a sharp drop in baby murders. That was what the pro life crowd was trying to achieve.
originally posted by: MOMof3
Well, maybe the women of Texas should give them what they want, state wide abstinence.
The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates, the U.S. government has funded abstinence-only sex education programs for more than a decade. However, a public controversy remains over whether this investment has been successful and whether these programs should be continued. Using the most recent national data (2005) from all U.S. states with information on sex education laws or policies (N = 48), we show that increasing emphasis on abstinence education is positively correlated with teenage pregnancy and birth rates.