It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It doesn't give special rights to the religious. It clearly states religious belief or moral conviction.
The only way it protects those with moral convictions is if those moral convictions are about gay people marrying or having sex, neither one of which is anyone's business.
This is a discrimination free-for-all against gay people, brought to you by the "good" people of the extremist Christian right.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
Do you believe that a government should be "taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that: (1) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or (2) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage?"
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Heres hoping that this proposal for a new law is just pandering for votes by the right for election day.
I find it sad that people are using their freedoms (to vote) to deny freedoms (discrimination) to others.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Abysha
And what law exactly does this give Christians privileges to circumvent?
Discrimination laws. You realize that Jim Crow is no longer in effect, right?
And speaking of Jim Crow, that was the same argument. Segregation had its foundation in the Christian church and they made that same argument about protecting their Christian rights.
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Heres hoping that this proposal for a new law is just pandering for votes by the right for election day.
I find it sad that people are using their freedoms (to vote) to deny freedoms (discrimination) to others.
Most anti-discrimination laws are frivolous anyway.
Let PRIVATE businesses decide who they want to serve.
Let them publicly say that they won't serve gays, blacks, latinos, etc
Let them go out of business when the people decide to not shop at that business anymore
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Abysha
Discrimination laws. You realize that Jim Crow is no longer in effect, right?
And speaking of Jim Crow, that was the same argument. Segregation had its foundation in the Christian church and they made that same argument about protecting their Christian rights.
Which discrimination law? This has nothing to do with Jim Crow. Try your straw men elsewhere.
While LGBT Americans are busy celebrating the spread of marriage equality, homophobic lawmakers have yet another trick up their sleeve. A new trend hitting legislatures across the country: sneaky laws that erode civil rights for LGBT citzens without ever actually mentioning LGBT people, or even same-sex marriage.
It's a clever strategic move, since it would be unconstitutional to call out gays and lesbians specifically in a law that revokes civil rights. So anti-equality politicians have figured out how to cleverly word new laws that still manage to target sexual orientation for discrimination. www.advocate.com...
how can these rubes be so blind as not to see that turning their religion into law to dictate how others need to live their lives is no different whatsoever than sharia law? this hypocracy is truly mind boggeling, even embarassing.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Abysha
Ok... how about you tell us what you think this law does.
Go read it. Simple.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: OhOkYeah
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Heres hoping that this proposal for a new law is just pandering for votes by the right for election day.
I find it sad that people are using their freedoms (to vote) to deny freedoms (discrimination) to others.
Most anti-discrimination laws are frivolous anyway.
Let PRIVATE businesses decide who they want to serve.
Let them publicly say that they won't serve gays, blacks, latinos, etc
Let them go out of business when the people decide to not shop at that business anymore
That have been discussed to death. That won't ever work.
The law gives Christians special exemptions to break the law. This is why I would like to hear your interpretation of what it actually does.
Discrimination is illegal. This law would allow Christians to discriminate. Therefore, this law would allow Christians to break the law. How does it not say that to you?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Abysha
The law gives Christians special exemptions to break the law. This is why I would like to hear your interpretation of what it actually does.
Discrimination is illegal. This law would allow Christians to discriminate. Therefore, this law would allow Christians to break the law. How does it not say that to you?
False.