It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

French launch airstrike against IS in Raqqa

page: 3
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: spy66

Exactly, it's not the case and it's not being done right now. That's because the military industrial complex needs war to continue and expand. The US is currently spending $14 million dollars a day in the Middle East and that number is only increasing as time goes on. ISIS is exactly what the MIC needs to keep it's profits up.

We're not in the Middle East to spread democracy and free people from an existence of death and destruction.




posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude
Any civilians living in Raqqa know the risks. If they haven't left already, then they are the enemy. Women and children, bomb them all. Yes, it's ugly, but war isn't a magic unicorn rainbow.

ISIS counts on the weakness of our rules of engagement, soon they will see the terror in the eyes of their comrades when they realize the west will be taking no prisoners. It's time to terrorize the terrorists.

#WesternArmchairWarriorYOLO


Yes. Bombing them out of their homes is going to solve the terror threat we have in Euriope.... right. Have it ever occured to you that...... that is why they are in europe killing europeens?



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: spy66

What is the alternative? Sit down and have a nice lovely chat about how wrong it is to kill civilians over tea and crumpets?

A2D



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:08 PM
link   
perhaps a less deadly strike first, something like an EMP? Since this all seems to be orchestrated anyway, testing grounds worldwide of how the future of Agenda 21-31 looks like in smaller quantities against less consumer related societies?

We know that the refugees who were stronger, richer more able bodies made it out, who's left to kill? The weak, the elder, the poor.

Paris the city of Love, please set the example of how to hit hard against your enemies but know the difference in enemy and innocent.

*I come from French Nobility, we escaped with our necks...
edit on pm1130pmSun, 15 Nov 2015 16:20:27 -0600 by antar because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: spy66

Exactly, it's not the case and it's not being done right now. That's because the military industrial complex needs war to continue and expand. The US is currently spending $14 million dollars a day in the Middle East and that number is only increasing as time goes on. ISIS is exactly what the MIC needs to keep it's profits up.

We're not in the Middle East to spread democracy and free people from an existence of death and destruction.


Correct .... We are not.

What we are doing right now is making Things much worse and unpredictable, because we are doing Things without thinking.

Our governments are just doing Things to show the Public that they are doing something.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:11 PM
link   
did they get permission from the Syrian govt and can Syria legally strike back?



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

I'm really glad the French have launched an attack on IS,but I really wish
it had been a massive co-ordinated attack involving all the actors
in the region... including Russia and American B52's to carpet bomb
IS held areas..

These scum need to die and to fear what’s above them ...
Every attack on them seems to me to be extremely moderate.

Let have it out with them ... showdown style.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: socketdude
Any civilians living in Raqqa know the risks. If they haven't left already, then they are the enemy. Women and children, bomb them all. Yes, it's ugly, but war isn't a magic unicorn rainbow.

ISIS counts on the weakness of our rules of engagement, soon they will see the terror in the eyes of their comrades when they realize the west will be taking no prisoners. It's time to terrorize the terrorists.

#WesternArmchairWarriorYOLO


Yes. Bombing them out of their homes is going to solve the terror threat we have in Euriope.... right. Have it ever occured to you that...... that is why they are in europe killing europeens?



Yes, it will solve it - eventually -- when their mothers and children are lying in rubble, not breathing, they might think to themselves..."Maybe we're doing it wrong?" If they actively target our civilians -- I'd love to see their face if we started blowing their civilians up! Would be hilarious! They'd be all like, "Huh?! Hey you guys weren't supposed to do that! That's not fair!!"



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Correct.

They don't give a toss about our civilians. Why should we give a damn about theirs?

So long as we play by the rules and they DON'T, we lose.
edit on 15-11-2015 by noonebutme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: chishuppu

I'm sure they got permission..Assad is fighting the same fight...so he'd welcome any assistance in maintaining control....

A2D



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
a reply to: spy66

What is the alternative? Sit down and have a nice lovely chat about how wrong it is to kill civilians over tea and crumpets?

A2D


Well a correct respons is much more reasonable than one that is just pulled out of someones rear end just to please the Public.

If a smart move takes a week or two. It would probably be Worth it. Going all cowboy in Syria With Russia and Syrian forces Close by is probably not Worth the risk.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: socketdude
Any civilians living in Raqqa know the risks. If they haven't left already, then they are the enemy. Women and children, bomb them all. Yes, it's ugly, but war isn't a magic unicorn rainbow.

ISIS counts on the weakness of our rules of engagement, soon they will see the terror in the eyes of their comrades when they realize the west will be taking no prisoners. It's time to terrorize the terrorists.

#WesternArmchairWarriorYOLO


Yes. Bombing them out of their homes is going to solve the terror threat we have in Euriope.... right. Have it ever occured to you that...... that is why they are in europe killing europeens?



Yes, it will solve it - eventually -- when their mothers and children are lying in rubble, not breathing, they might think to themselves..."Maybe we're doing it wrong?" If they actively target our civilians -- I'd love to see their face if we started blowing their civilians up! Would be hilarious! They'd be all like, "Huh?! Hey you guys weren't supposed to do that! That's not fair!!"


how do you think this all started, google that shock and awe 2003 vid, after you are done remember that Baghdad like Houston, Atlanta, Chicago etc is a city filled with people, not a military target.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: spy66

What's the smart move? These types of ignorant terrorists only understand one thing...unmitigated violence.

A2D



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
a reply to: chishuppu

I'm sure they got permission..Assad is fighting the same fight...so he'd welcome any assistance in maintaining control....

A2D


Russia got permission, Iran got permission. Till now no proof besides someone saying ISIS claimed responsibility has been brought forth. I mean how does one claim responsibility, do they call ISIS headquarters and talk to the boss, do they get an email, or telegraph claiming responsibility. I mean come on.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: socketdude
Any civilians living in Raqqa know the risks. If they haven't left already, then they are the enemy. Women and children, bomb them all. Yes, it's ugly, but war isn't a magic unicorn rainbow.

ISIS counts on the weakness of our rules of engagement, soon they will see the terror in the eyes of their comrades when they realize the west will be taking no prisoners. It's time to terrorize the terrorists.

#WesternArmchairWarriorYOLO


Yes. Bombing them out of their homes is going to solve the terror threat we have in Euriope.... right. Have it ever occured to you that...... that is why they are in europe killing europeens?



Yes, it will solve it - eventually -- when their mothers and children are lying in rubble, not breathing, they might think to themselves..."Maybe we're doing it wrong?" If they actively target our civilians -- I'd love to see their face if we started blowing their civilians up! Would be hilarious! They'd be all like, "Huh?! Hey you guys weren't supposed to do that! That's not fair!!"


Do yo know who IS is?

Are ISIS made up of People from Syria?

IS are fighting Syrians. Yeah Bright move.... lets help them out.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
a reply to: spy66

What's the smart move? These types of ignorant terrorists only understand one thing...unmitigated violence.

A2D


So who is the more brutal killer between them and the people you want to send?



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity




So riddle me this. How'd they acquire those targets so fast when the U.S. and/or Russia either didn't have them or didn't act. Maybe one or both provided them to the French so they could get some good old-fashioned revenge. Ugh.


When they conveniently found that passport in Paris ,there were directions on the back page on how to get back to their training site,you know in case they got lost



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: chishuppu

It's called the intelligence community for a reason.

They know who did it even without someone claiming responsibility...because that's their job..and with nearly the entire global community condemning the attacks in Paris....you can expect at least a little bit of shared intel...

A2D



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: chishuppu

originally posted by: socketdude

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: socketdude
Any civilians living in Raqqa know the risks. If they haven't left already, then they are the enemy. Women and children, bomb them all. Yes, it's ugly, but war isn't a magic unicorn rainbow.

ISIS counts on the weakness of our rules of engagement, soon they will see the terror in the eyes of their comrades when they realize the west will be taking no prisoners. It's time to terrorize the terrorists.

#WesternArmchairWarriorYOLO


Yes. Bombing them out of their homes is going to solve the terror threat we have in Euriope.... right. Have it ever occured to you that...... that is why they are in europe killing europeens?



Yes, it will solve it - eventually -- when their mothers and children are lying in rubble, not breathing, they might think to themselves..."Maybe we're doing it wrong?" If they actively target our civilians -- I'd love to see their face if we started blowing their civilians up! Would be hilarious! They'd be all like, "Huh?! Hey you guys weren't supposed to do that! That's not fair!!"


how do you think this all started, google that shock and awe 2003 vid, after you are done remember that Baghdad like Houston, Atlanta, Chicago etc is a city filled with people, not a military target.


Yeah.... but who do you want to Assault to hurt IS?

DO you think killing Syirans are going to do the trick? Think for a minut... please.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:23 PM
link   
This is propaganda and just proves targets known to be part of Isis aren't being taken out when they could be.




top topics



 
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join