It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: jhn7537
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Zhennn
a reply to: alienjuggalo
the cop could shoot the tires.
Or he could just run the plates and pick him up later?
And what if the guy was already wanted, ie having a warrant out for something more serious than pot? You act like its easy to just "pick up a criminal" at a later date/time.
If and buts and coconuts.
That is NOT a policemans job to make judgements like that regarding if and buts for LETHAL force.
Its black and white. Is he poiseing a threat threat of violence for the public? No? Then no lethal force!
In any civilized country lethal force is only used if a suspect is clearly posing a direct threat to the public .
But hey by your logic of allowing lethal force for what ifs ,maybe a policeman should just shoot you? I mean you could commit a crime oneday.
You may as well scrap the 5th and 6th Amendments. Who needs them when a cop is judge jury and executioner?
originally posted by: Hendrick99
originally posted by: jimmyx
...so for all you people out there, when a cop gets to the point where he draws his weapon on you, HE WANTS TO SHOOT YOU.
You are absolutely clueless.
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
originally posted by: jhn7537
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Zhennn
a reply to: alienjuggalo
the cop could shoot the tires.
Or he could just run the plates and pick him up later?
And what if the guy was already wanted, ie having a warrant out for something more serious than pot? You act like its easy to just "pick up a criminal" at a later date/time.
What if he had no criminal record?
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
you guys keep justifying this by saying he was speeding away and going to lead them on a high speed chase and an innocent person (you know like the one who gets shot in the video) might get run over or hurt..
I say no way this guys leads them on a high speed chase over 2 grams of weed that his effing girlfriend was on the hook for.
You keep talking about the innocent bystanders, and seem to forget that this 19 year old kid was 1000% innocent and had no criminal record and was just eating his hamburger at Hardees when a guy pulls up screaming holding a gun.
You cant just shoot someone over some weed, and its truly sickening that some people on here support that..
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: jhn7537
So failure to comply now justifies a death penalty? I mean why not, it did in East Berlin.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: crazyewok
Come on man, do you really believe the driver would speed away to just drive the speed limit? Of course it would develop into a high speed chase, which would have put anyone in that general area on the road/sidewalks/etc in danger...
originally posted by: jhn7537
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
originally posted by: jhn7537
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Zhennn
a reply to: alienjuggalo
the cop could shoot the tires.
Or he could just run the plates and pick him up later?
And what if the guy was already wanted, ie having a warrant out for something more serious than pot? You act like its easy to just "pick up a criminal" at a later date/time.
What if he had no criminal record?
I'm sure he was a choir boy, who's never done anything wrong...
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: crazyewok
Come on man, do you really believe the driver would speed away to just drive the speed limit? Of course it would develop into a high speed chase, which would have put anyone in that general area on the road/sidewalks/etc in danger...
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: crazyewok
What, you mean a measured, common sense approach to Policing?
In America?