It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
What is yours, if you don't mind my asking?
I've posted mine, several times. www.abovetopsecret.com...
Forgive me, but I am having trouble understanding where you draw the line for late term, from the post that you linked.
Perhaps defining terms would help?
Studies and estimates show that "Late term" abortions represent between .08% - 1.4% of abortions.
When is it permitted?
As of December 2014, forty-two states had bans on late-term abortions that were not facially unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade (i.e. banning all abortions) or enjoined by court order.[20] In addition, the Supreme Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart ruled that Congress may ban certain late-term abortion techniques, "both previability and postviability".
Eighteen states prohibit abortion after a certain number of weeks' gestation (usually 22 weeks from the last menstrual period).
Ten states (although Florida's enforcement of such laws are under permanent injunction) require a second physician to approve
Thirteen states have laws that require a second physician to be present during late-term abortion procedures in order to treat a fetus if born alive.
The Supreme Court has held that bans must include exceptions for threats to the woman's life, physical health, and mental health, but four states allow late-term abortions only when the woman's life is at risk; four allow them when the woman's life or physical health is at risk, but use a definition of health that pro-choice organizations believe is impermissibly narrow.
en.wikipedia.org...
I gave the member my cut-off line of 26 weeks.
I was looking for theirs.
That is all.
Mine is 22 weeks absent a compelling argument. I am "pro-life" and "pro-choice". I am not convinced that life exists prior to the second trimester. I base this on the miscarriage rate aka spontaneous abortions aka abortions by nature/god..moving from 75% in the first couple weeks to less than 1% after the 22 week mark...to actually putting the mothers life at risk at time of delivery. IMO it speaks to Nature/God weighing in on when life begins.
I find it interesting that you project my abhorrence of late term abortion into
me supporting things you assume I would agree with. Haven't you learned
what happens when you assume something about someone?
I heard that directly from a woman that had a very late term abortion.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Now we're taking cartoons seriously? LOL...All well and good...until somebody up and draws a cartoon of Muhammad.
"How are the mighty fallen in the midst of the battle!"
I bet Muhammad's Mother was Pro-Life.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
I heard that directly from a woman that had a very late term abortion.
How late is very late? Elective abortion is legal before viability, usually around 22-24 weeks. If a fetal anomaly is found, the fetus may NEVER be considered "viable".
originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The issue is going to be harder and harder for PP and its supporters to defend as I understand the yet to be released videos get worse and worse for PP's claims that its not breaking current federal and various states laws.
Yes I find this killing to be as abhorrent as killing babies over 24 weeks, killing on average 9,000 of them per year in the US.
originally posted by: BlackboxInquiry
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Then Sir, you've mistaken who I am and what I'd like.
Laws need to be upheld, no more crony saving.
Nobody should be above the law.
I too tire of the 'mummified' brains of a growing number of the population. Tire of the closed-door deals, special interests getting special treatment.
By the way, if the country keeps going this way, the movie Idiocracy seems to come to mind...maybe that's their intended blue print?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
No (ethical) doctor in the USA would abort a 9 month old fetus because the mom was mad at her "baby daddy". That doesn't mean that "she" didn't do something to harm herself, and/or her fetus to force an abortion.
People will never cease to amaze me in the stupid things they do out of desperation. A member here, "Bones75" (?), told the story of how his very pregnant (ex)wife held a knife to her belly, threatening to kill her fetus, while they were have an argument. I'm not condoning that, just saying, it happens.
Girl age 15, accompanied by relative (1998): said to have told Gosnell she changed her mind about the abortion once inside the practice. Gosnell allegedly got upset, ripped off the patient's clothing, and forcibly restrained her. The patient later stated that Gosnell told her "This is the same care that I would give to my own daughter." She regained consciousness 12 hours later at her aunt's home, the abortion having been completed against her will.
originally posted by: Lostinthedarkness
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Travel with over a $1000 cash get stopped cops many times seize it, small business daily cash sales on 3 days were 9900 and charged for structuring whole foods sells milk whole milk store is shut down with a swat team raid , an Amish dairyman same thing. Clinic 1 Dr under investigation for scrips / favors whole clinic lost the right to prescribe pain killers. You read about these all the time . All deprive people of rights. Its NOT uncommon.
You mean you have never seen where a well connected person or group received preferential treatment by courts and governmental agencies ?
If you cant see the gulf between political connected and regular citizens. I dont know what to say .