It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: windword
Discrimination is not a violation of freedom (unless implimented by the government).
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Ghost147
So you must then also agree that it is within a persons religious rights and freedom to kill a person who rejects the verdict of a priest
No. Because in an equal liberty society, murder is an obstruction to another individual's liberty.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: JadeStar
Ok. So tell me how I'm abstructing your liberty. You arent entitled to my respect. So you can't say that my offending you is an obstruction of your rights.
You made the accusation, now you back it up.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Ghost147
I knew that would come up. That law is unconstitutional. It violates the very founding principle of the Bill of Rights. Please understand, I'm don't consider myself to be racist. I'm latino, and I've experienced my fair share of racism, but it's not right to force someone who hates me to serve me. It only makes them hate me more.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Ghost147
I knew that would come up. That law is unconstitutional.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: JadeStar
Ok. So tell me how I'm abstructing your liberty. You arent entitled to my respect. So you can't say that my offending you is an obstruction of your rights.
You made the accusation, now you back it up.
I don't understand. Why wouldn't you respect me? What have I done to you?
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Ghost147
I knew that would come up. That law is unconstitutional.
So you are admitting that it is a law, and that your previously posted statement that the baker did not commit any unlawful act is incorrect?
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Ghost147
Look, I agree, under the Constitution, homosexuals and polygamists should be able to marry. I dont morally support that, but the Constitution is not a moral codex.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: JadeStar
freedom to discriminate,
I do respect you. I dont support you, but I respect you. But that doesn't mean I HAVE TO respect you.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Darth_Prime
I will believe what I want. Its my right. Thats my point.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
Today its the LGBT doctrine. Tomorrow it will be pedophilia, gang rape and murder. Its not a social rights issue. Its order vesus lawlessness.