It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Based on the comments from many here on ATS, and in other places, a lot of people are hoping this affects the churches. Ah, the tolerance.......
Christians should 'learn their place", are "irrelevant", are "as bad as the Taliban", etc, etc, ad nauseum. Some people need to stop talking about tolerance.
originally posted by: ketsuko
I knew someone would say that, but the point is that it wasn't until they passed the amendment. At least twice before, such taxes had been taken to SCOTUS with a mixed history and they were always finite.
Tax exempt status for religion institutions goes back as far as Mesopotamian cultures. You might almost say it's as old as marriage itself.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
If the 1st Amendment can be disregarded with such casualness, then what freedoms and liberties might be next?
originally posted by: Aazadan
Across the street from the grocery store I shop at is a park, on the weekends preachers like to go there and preach their Christian word. The guy today had quite a crowd, he was telling the audience of how God spoke to him and said that if they don't want to marry the gays now what they need to do is run them all out of town, and keep them away from their churches and schools.
It didn't sound to me like a very tolerant group.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If people are so against some churches, how about they jst don't go to them? Same for bakeries.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: Aazadan
Across the street from the grocery store I shop at is a park, on the weekends preachers like to go there and preach their Christian word. The guy today had quite a crowd, he was telling the audience of how God spoke to him and said that if they don't want to marry the gays now what they need to do is run them all out of town, and keep them away from their churches and schools.
It didn't sound to me like a very tolerant group.
I have heard some Christians speak on the issue, but not a one talked that way. When I hear people saying that they hope Christians disappear, or are fined, or whatever, I don't call that tolerance. Especially from a group that throws the word around like a battle cry.
If people are so against some churches, how about they jst don't go to them? Same for bakeries.
originally posted by: combinatorics
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If people are so against some churches, how about they jst don't go to them? Same for bakeries.
Do churches call the cops if they get robbed? I betcha. Do they pay taxes for that privilege? Do the gay people pay taxes to support the whole infrastructure? Gays simply do not appreciate supporting the same very people who spit them in the face.
originally posted by: Aazadan
They already don't go to those churches. The churches however haven't been content to leave it at that. They lobby politicians to get their religious beliefs codified into law and create voting blocks based upon religious beliefs. No one is talking about forcing churches to marry gays (except the Christians oddly enough).
What this entire thing can be reduced to is that church doctrine is subservient to the state and a lot of Christians simply don't want to accept that right now. Marriage, while being a religious practice is primarily a function of government and the government needs to accept marriages from all. The church doesn't have to recognize or perform every marriage but they can't use their marriage practices to deny others from the legal and financial benefits.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
No one spit on anyone. the people who form churches pay taxes, so they paid for the service already. Next?
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Actually, people are talking about it. Even Justice Roberts is talking about it, and he knows more about the law than either you or I. Rather the entire point of this thread. Voting blocks are formed by many groups, homosexuals included.
You just admitted that this is about placing churches under the control of the government, which is against the Constitution. Looks like Roberts is correct.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
They don't HAVE to conform and marry them.
WE still have FREEDOM to worship who and how we want and this won't change.
even the Supreme ct HAS to obey the law and the current admin with be gone soon.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
You have a disturbing amount of faith in paper and ink. The only thing that's protecting religious freedom at all in this country today is the sheer number of religious people.
originally posted by: combinatorics
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If people are so against some churches, how about they jst don't go to them? Same for bakeries.
Do churches call the cops if they get robbed? I betcha. Do they pay taxes for that privilege? Do the gay people pay taxes to support the whole infrastructure? Gays simply do not appreciate supporting the same very people who spit them in the face.