It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seagull
I can't help but wonder if there's an ulterior motive here.
Something in the pyramid, or under perhaps, and antiquity thieves are the driving force behind it? Just blueskying.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: seagull
I kinda doubt anything that cool is behind it. Like someone else suggested it probably has to do with some oil company needing roads for their trucks or something like that. Basically just the typical big business cutting through everything regardless of it's value so it can make a buck even faster.
Belize has these ruins like this all over the place also so it's not like coming across one of them is uncommon. You can easily buy property down there where you might have some kind of Mayan ruins on it. A lot of them are just sitting there in the open and you can go explore them all you want. The major ones are tourist attractions though which if this was a major one means someone would have had to pay enough to where the tourist money wouldn't be missed. But in the end I'm sure it just came down to bribing the right person and it probably wasn't even that much of a bribe that did it.
"The Mayas use good material to build their temples, and these temples are close to (the village of) Douglas so that means that they have to use less diesel, less wear and tear; they can do more trips per day, and at the end of the day they can make more money," CTV3 quotes Briceno as saying.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: seagull
This is from a CNN report.
"The Mayas use good material to build their temples, and these temples are close to (the village of) Douglas so that means that they have to use less diesel, less wear and tear; they can do more trips per day, and at the end of the day they can make more money," CTV3 quotes Briceno as saying.
But they also say it's against the law to just destroy it and are going after the land owner and the construction company. But I can't find a follow up.
It did say that it was overgrown with trees and stuff too. I doubt that it had any artifacts left in it by this point.
originally posted by: Greathouse
Sickening and sad, this has happened throughout history from ancient Roman ruins to the 1800s and the mound builders in the Ohio Valley. Temples and ancient structures being destroyed for building material it seems like we would have learned by now.